【摘要】：改革開放以來(lái)的三十多年里,我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)高速發(fā)展主要依賴于高消耗、高投入、高排放以及低效率的支撐。中國(guó)的GDP占全球GDP的12%,而能源消費(fèi)卻占到了世界總量的22%,碳排放量更是占到了30%。如何協(xié)調(diào)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)與能源節(jié)約、環(huán)境保護(hù)間的關(guān)系,日益受到多方關(guān)注。福建省作為中國(guó)東南沿海大省,加快經(jīng)濟(jì)綠色發(fā)展是提升競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力、對(duì)接國(guó)家政策的必行之舉。目前,相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的學(xué)術(shù)界已經(jīng)達(dá)成共識(shí),推動(dòng)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的重要來(lái)源是技術(shù)進(jìn)步。而在推動(dòng)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的技術(shù)進(jìn)步過(guò)程中,生產(chǎn)者會(huì)對(duì)不同生產(chǎn)要素產(chǎn)生差異偏好,這種對(duì)各種投入要素偏好的差異將直接影響生產(chǎn)所帶來(lái)的能源消耗和污染排放。因此,在技術(shù)進(jìn)步有偏的實(shí)際情況下,對(duì)福建省節(jié)能減排的最優(yōu)綠色發(fā)展路徑進(jìn)行研究具有重要意義。本文根據(jù)要素集約度產(chǎn)業(yè)分類法,將經(jīng)過(guò)整理的36個(gè)福建省工業(yè)行業(yè)劃分為資源密集型、勞動(dòng)密集型和資本密集型三類工業(yè)行業(yè)。首先利用SBM-DDF模型對(duì)三類異質(zhì)性工業(yè)行業(yè)的節(jié)能效率及潛力、減排效率及潛力進(jìn)行測(cè)算。其次,采用超越對(duì)數(shù)生產(chǎn)函數(shù)形式的隨機(jī)前沿方法,對(duì)福建省工業(yè)行業(yè)的有偏技術(shù)進(jìn)步現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行測(cè)算和分析。最后,對(duì)要素產(chǎn)出彈性和要素替代彈性進(jìn)行測(cè)算,并在其測(cè)算結(jié)果的基礎(chǔ)上結(jié)合節(jié)能減排現(xiàn)狀和技術(shù)進(jìn)步要素偏向的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行研究,從要素偏向程度的角度為三類異質(zhì)性工業(yè)行業(yè)選擇綠色發(fā)展的最優(yōu)路徑。本文研究發(fā)現(xiàn),與處于生產(chǎn)前沿面上的工業(yè)行業(yè)相比,福建省大部分工業(yè)行業(yè)的節(jié)能效率和減排效率并不理想,減排效率略高于節(jié)能效率,且存在較大的節(jié)能減排潛力;福建省工業(yè)部門的技術(shù)進(jìn)步表現(xiàn)為對(duì)勞動(dòng)要素和能源要素的雙重依賴;從要素偏好程度高低的角度做出工業(yè)綠色發(fā)展路徑的最優(yōu)選擇:資源密集型行業(yè)為勞動(dòng)-資本-能源-環(huán)境,勞動(dòng)密集型行業(yè)為勞動(dòng)-能源-環(huán)境-資本,資本密集型行業(yè)為資本-勞動(dòng)-環(huán)境-能源。研究成果為福建省不同類型的工業(yè)行業(yè),在技術(shù)進(jìn)步的綠色發(fā)展過(guò)程中調(diào)整要素偏好順序提供了可靠依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:In the past 30 years since the reform and opening up, the rapid economic development of our country mainly depends on the support of high consumption, high input, high emission and low efficiency. China's GDP accounts for 12% of global GDP, while energy consumption accounts for 22% of the world's total, and carbon emissions account for 30%. How to coordinate the relationship between economic growth and energy conservation and environmental protection has attracted more and more attention. As a large coastal province in southeast China, Fujian Province is necessary to accelerate the green development of economy. At present, the academic circles in related fields have reached a consensus that the important source of economic growth is technological progress. In the process of promoting economic growth, producers will have different preferences for different factors of production, which will directly affect the energy consumption and pollution emissions caused by production. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the optimal green development path of energy saving and emission reduction in Fujian Province. In this paper, 36 industries in Fujian Province are classified into three types: resource-intensive, labor-intensive and capital-intensive. Firstly, the energy saving efficiency and potential, emission reduction efficiency and potential of three heterogeneous industries are measured by SBM-DDF model. Secondly, using the stochastic frontier method in the form of logarithmic production function, the paper calculates and analyzes the present situation of the biased technology progress in Fujian industrial industry. Finally, the elasticity of factor output and the elasticity of factor substitution are calculated, and based on the calculation results, the current situation of energy saving and emission reduction and the current situation of factor bias of technological progress are studied. From the angle of factor bias, the optimal path of green development is chosen for three kinds of heterogeneous industries. In this paper, compared with the industrial industries on the front line of production, the energy-saving efficiency and emission-reduction efficiency of most industrial industries in Fujian Province are not ideal, the emission reduction efficiency is slightly higher than the energy-saving efficiency, and there is a great potential for energy-saving and emission-reduction. The technological progress of the industrial sector in Fujian Province is characterized by the dual dependence on the labor and energy elements; From the angle of the degree of factor preference, the optimal choice of industrial green development path is made: the resource-intensive industry is labor-capital-energy-environment, the labor-intensive industry is labor-energy-environment-capital. Capital-intensive industries are capital-labor-environment-energy. The research results provide a reliable basis for adjusting the preference order of factors in the process of green development of technological progress in different types of industrial industries in Fujian Province.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華僑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F427

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊振兵;邵帥;楊莉莉;;中國(guó)綠色工業(yè)變革的最優(yōu)路徑選擇——基于技術(shù)進(jìn)步要素偏向視角的經(jīng)驗(yàn)考察[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2016年01期

2 王兵;劉光天;;節(jié)能減排與中國(guó)綠色經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)——基于全要素生產(chǎn)率的視角[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年05期

3 郝楓;;超越對(duì)數(shù)函數(shù)要素替代彈性公式修正與估計(jì)方法比較[J];數(shù)量經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年04期

4 王光棟;;有偏技術(shù)進(jìn)步、技術(shù)路徑與就業(yè)增長(zhǎng)[J];工業(yè)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年12期

5 郭玲玲;武春友;;中國(guó)節(jié)能減排潛力測(cè)度與優(yōu)化路徑[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年11期

6 胡春龍;常逸聰;;產(chǎn)出彈性、替代彈性與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的關(guān)系分析——基于西部地區(qū)面板模型的經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究[J];金融發(fā)展研究;2014年10期

7 余泳澤;鄧姍姍;;我國(guó)節(jié)能減排的現(xiàn)狀、問(wèn)題與解決路徑——一個(gè)文獻(xiàn)綜述[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2014年06期

8 景維民;張璐;;環(huán)境管制、對(duì)外開放與中國(guó)工業(yè)的綠色技術(shù)進(jìn)步[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2014年09期

9 張奮勤;孫永平;余s，

本文編號(hào)：2316278