本文選題：長江中游地區(qū) + 能源效率　； 參考：《中國礦業(yè)》2017年08期

【摘要】：運用泰爾熵指數(shù)對2001~2015年長江中游、京津冀、長三角和珠三角等四大地區(qū)能源效率的差異性進(jìn)行實證研究,之后利用Malmquist生產(chǎn)率指數(shù),對長江中游地區(qū)全要素能源效率變動進(jìn)行分解,并與其他三個地區(qū)進(jìn)行對比分析。研究結(jié)果表明:(1)總體能源效率差距和區(qū)域間的能源效率差距都呈現(xiàn)出先增后減的趨勢,區(qū)域間能源效率差距是總體能源效率差的主要構(gòu)成部分;(2)長江中游區(qū)域內(nèi)部的能源效率差逐漸減小,但仍然高于長三角和珠三角地區(qū);(3)長江中游地區(qū)全要素能源效率主要依賴于技術(shù)進(jìn)步。最后根據(jù)分析得出結(jié)論和啟示,制定區(qū)域節(jié)能戰(zhàn)略堅持"求同存異",加大對長江中游地區(qū)的政策傾斜力度,加快技術(shù)進(jìn)步,積極進(jìn)行能源技術(shù)創(chuàng)新等。
[Abstract]:The difference of energy efficiency in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta from 2001 to 2015 was studied by using Tyrentropy Index, and then Malmquist productivity index was used. The variation of total factor energy efficiency in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River is decomposed and compared with the other three regions. The results show that: (1) the overall energy efficiency gap and the interregional energy efficiency gap show a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. The energy efficiency gap between regions is the main component of the overall energy efficiency inefficiency. (2) the energy efficiency gap within the middle reaches of the Yangtze River decreases gradually. But it is still higher than the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta. (3) the total factor energy efficiency in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River mainly depends on technological progress. Finally, according to the conclusion and inspiration of the analysis, the regional energy-saving strategy should be formulated to "seek common ground while reserving differences", increase the policy inclination to the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, accelerate the technological progress, and actively carry out the energy technology innovation, etc.
【作者單位】： 中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)(武漢)經(jīng)濟(jì)管理學(xué)院;
【分類號】：F224;F426.2
，

本文編號：2107371