本文選題：市場一體化 + 地區(qū)專業(yè)化�。� 參考：《中南財經(jīng)政法大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：地區(qū)專業(yè)化是經(jīng)濟地理學的重要研究領域,對區(qū)域協(xié)調發(fā)展有重要作用,而市場一體化是影響地區(qū)專業(yè)化水平的重要因素。盡管改革開放以來我國區(qū)域經(jīng)濟發(fā)展已經(jīng)取得了巨大成就,但產(chǎn)業(yè)結構趨同和市場分割問題仍然十分突出。一方面是對內區(qū)域整合受地方保護政策、區(qū)位因素等制約而進展受阻,另一方面是對外開放質量不高、深度不足,導致我國產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚效應不強,地區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)結構專業(yè)化進程緩慢。當前,我國產(chǎn)業(yè)結構特別是工業(yè)結構轉型、升級尤為關鍵,因而本文的主要目的是探究我國各區(qū)域的市場一體化進程和工業(yè)地區(qū)專業(yè)化水平的發(fā)展狀況,以及市場一體化對工業(yè)地區(qū)專業(yè)化的影響機理。在理論層面,本文結合新經(jīng)濟地理學理論,從產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的角度解構了市場一體化對地區(qū)專業(yè)化的影響機理,提出市場一體化通過影響特定產(chǎn)業(yè)的產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚進而影響地區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)結構格局的分析路徑,并結合我國區(qū)域經(jīng)濟發(fā)展歷程中的特殊環(huán)境,提出了一系列研究假設。在實證層面,首先,本文設計了內、外部市場一體化和工業(yè)地區(qū)專業(yè)化的評價指標并進行了測度及分析,之后在指標測度的基礎上,分別對全國整體和分區(qū)域進行了實證檢驗,以2005-2014十年間30個省份為樣本,在動態(tài)面板模型中,運用系統(tǒng)廣義矩估計方法(GMM方法)對市場一體化對工業(yè)地區(qū)專業(yè)化的影響進行了實證研究,對前文提出的研究假設進行了驗證。本文研究表明,新世紀以來內部市場一體化呈現(xiàn)“U”型變化趨勢,外部市場一體化在逐漸下降,而工業(yè)地區(qū)專業(yè)化指數(shù)則變化較小,較為平緩。我國各區(qū)域中,東部沿海省份和中部省份的市場一體化水平較高,地區(qū)專業(yè)化水平較低;西部地區(qū)、東北三省的地區(qū)專業(yè)化水平較高,市場一體化水平則較低。在實證檢驗中,本文在全國層面和東、中、西三大區(qū)域層面證實了市場一體化對工業(yè)地區(qū)專業(yè)化的影響為倒“U”型,但在現(xiàn)階段,內、外部市場一體化對工業(yè)地區(qū)專業(yè)化水平的影響都顯著為正,兩者之間的交互關系則為負。實證檢驗同時也證明了地區(qū)專業(yè)化水平自身會循環(huán)累積、自我強化。最后,結合前文分析,本文提出了提高國內外市場整合程度和地區(qū)專業(yè)化水平的政策建議。與以往研究相比,本文的主要創(chuàng)新點在于,提出了“市場一體化-產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚-地區(qū)專業(yè)化”的影響機理,將市場一體化劃分為內、外部市場一體化,又將內部市場一體化細化為產(chǎn)品市場一體化與要素市場一體化,以使得對市場一體化的評價體系更加全面、客觀。此外,有別于以往研究中普遍應用的靜態(tài)模型,本文構建了動態(tài)面板模型,通過系統(tǒng)廣義矩估計方法進行實證檢驗,減少了以往實證研究中的內生性問題,使得檢驗結果更為準確,從全國和分區(qū)域兩個層面證實了市場一體化對地區(qū)專業(yè)化影響的倒“U”型趨勢。
[Abstract]:Regional specialization is an important research field in economic geography, which plays an important role in regional coordinated development, and market integration is an important factor affecting the level of regional specialization. Although great achievements have been made in the development of regional economy since the reform and opening up, the problems of convergence of industrial structure and market segmentation are still very prominent. On the one hand, the development of internal regional integration is hindered by local protection policies and location factors. On the other hand, the quality of opening to the outside world is not high and the depth is insufficient, which leads to the weak effect of industrial agglomeration and the slow process of specialization of regional industrial structure. At present, the industrial structure of our country, especially the transformation of industrial structure, is especially crucial to upgrade. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to explore the process of market integration and the development of specialization level in various regions of our country. And the influence mechanism of market integration to industrial area specialization. At the theoretical level, combined with the new economic geography theory, this paper deconstructs the influence mechanism of market integration on regional specialization from the angle of industrial agglomeration. This paper puts forward the analysis path of market integration which influences the industrial agglomeration of specific industries and then affects the pattern of regional industrial structure, and puts forward a series of research hypotheses combined with the special environment in the course of regional economic development of our country. At the empirical level, first of all, this paper designs the internal and external market integration and industrial area specialization evaluation index, and then on the basis of the index measure, carries on the empirical test to the whole country and the sub-region. Taking 30 provinces from 2005 to 2014 as samples, this paper makes an empirical study on the effect of market integration on the specialization of industrial areas by using the generalized moment estimation (GMM) method in the dynamic panel model. The above research hypotheses are verified. This paper shows that the internal market integration has a "U" type change trend since the new century, the external market integration is decreasing gradually, while the industrial area specialization index has a relatively small change and is more gentle. In each region of our country, the level of market integration is higher and the level of regional specialization is lower in the eastern coastal province and central province, while the level of regional specialization is higher in the western region and the three provinces in Northeast China, but the level of market integration is lower. In the empirical test, this paper proves that the influence of market integration on the specialization of industrial areas is the inverted "U" type at the national level, in the east, in the middle and in the west, but at the present stage, the influence of market integration on the specialization of industrial areas is of the reverse "U" type. The influence of the integration of external market on the specialization level of industrial area is significant positive, and the interaction between them is negative. At the same time, the empirical test also proves that the level of regional specialization itself will accumulate and self-strengthen. Finally, combined with the previous analysis, this paper puts forward some policy suggestions to improve the degree of market integration and regional specialization at home and abroad. Compared with the previous studies, the main innovation of this paper is that the influence mechanism of "market integration-industrial agglomeration-regional specialization" is put forward, and the market integration is divided into internal and external market integration. The integration of internal market is divided into the integration of product market and factor market so as to make the evaluation system of market integration more comprehensive and objective. In addition, different from the static model commonly used in previous studies, this paper constructs a dynamic panel model, which is tested by the system generalized moment estimation method, which reduces the endogenous problems in the previous empirical research. The test results are more accurate, and the trend of "U" type of market integration on regional specialization is confirmed from the national and sub-regional levels.
【學位授予單位】：中南財經(jīng)政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F427

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 趙驊;施美娟;;西南地區(qū)制造業(yè)專業(yè)化與產(chǎn)業(yè)同構及對策研究[J];工業(yè)技術經(jīng)濟;2016年07期

2 劉漢中;劉佳麗;;地區(qū)專業(yè)化集聚對經(jīng)濟增長的效應分析[J];城市學刊;2016年03期

3 周國富;葉亞珂;彭星;;產(chǎn)業(yè)的多樣化、專業(yè)化對京津冀市場一體化的影響[J];城市問題;2016年04期

4 姚德文;孫國鋒;;產(chǎn)業(yè)專業(yè)化對城鎮(zhèn)化的影響——基于長三角地區(qū)1986-2012年的面板數(shù)據(jù)分析[J];山西財經(jīng)大學學報;2016年02期

5 孫寧華;韓逸平;;地區(qū)專業(yè)化與制造業(yè)結構優(yōu)化——基于省級面板數(shù)據(jù)的經(jīng)驗分析[J];南京大學學報(哲學·人文科學·社會科學);2016年01期

6 崔慶波;梁雙陸;;我國國內市場一體化的影響因素分析——基于面板數(shù)據(jù)的檢驗[J];工業(yè)技術經(jīng)濟;2016年01期

7 張超;郭海霞;沈體雁;;中國空間市場一體化演化特征——基于“一價定律"與空間杜賓模型[J];財經(jīng)科學;2016年01期

8 劉琳;劉保武;;京津冀一體化背景下河北對接京津產(chǎn)業(yè)梯度轉移問題研究[J];邢臺學院學報;2015年03期

9 張琳彥;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚測度方法研究[J];技術經(jīng)濟與管理研究;2015年06期

10 王春雷;;區(qū)域政策協(xié)調模式選擇及其對區(qū)域市場一體化的影響[J];中央財經(jīng)大學學報;2015年05期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 鐘龍軍;市場一體化對地區(qū)專業(yè)化的影響研究[D];吉林大學;2015年

，

本文編號：2078840