本文選題：技術(shù)獲取型并購 + 中國制造業(yè)��； 參考：《北京交通大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：目前中國制造業(yè)“大而不強(qiáng)”,總體技術(shù)水平落后,自主創(chuàng)新能力弱。我國與世界制造強(qiáng)國的差距主要體現(xiàn)在部分關(guān)鍵核心技術(shù)缺失,制造業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)供給側(cè)改革勢在必行。經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化不斷加速,并購毫無疑問地成為企業(yè)提升競爭力、快速獲得成長的一條重要途徑;但與此同時(shí),并購涉及到戰(zhàn)略規(guī)劃、文化融合、組織管理水平和并購整合等多方面難題,導(dǎo)致并購結(jié)果往往以失敗告終,居高不下的并購失敗率讓大多數(shù)企業(yè)望而卻步。海外并購作為中國制造業(yè)企業(yè)獲取核心技術(shù),提高企業(yè)競爭力水平的重要方式,發(fā)展勢頭強(qiáng)勁,然而如何通過并購,提升企業(yè)技術(shù)水平和自主創(chuàng)新能力的問題仍然普遍存在。本文通過查閱國內(nèi)外相關(guān)文獻(xiàn),了解最新研究動態(tài),以并購理論、技術(shù)整合理論、核心競爭力理論、知識基礎(chǔ)觀理論為基礎(chǔ),吸收和借鑒了國內(nèi)外相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)的研究成果,使用多案例分析的研究方法,結(jié)合知識基礎(chǔ)觀理論,探索企業(yè)并購后實(shí)現(xiàn)技術(shù)整合的一般路徑,并以中國制造業(yè)企業(yè)的海外并購事件為案例,分析并購各階段存在的問題與風(fēng)險(xiǎn),探討有利于中國制造業(yè)企業(yè)通過海外并購實(shí)現(xiàn)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的技術(shù)整合策略。知識是技術(shù)的本質(zhì),技術(shù)的有效轉(zhuǎn)移、應(yīng)用和提升過程,就是知識的轉(zhuǎn)移與提升的過程。知識基礎(chǔ)觀理論是從知識的角度解釋企業(yè)通過并購獲取核心技術(shù),得到競爭力的理論基礎(chǔ),技術(shù)整合是解釋企業(yè)通過并購獲得技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的方式。根據(jù)知識基礎(chǔ)觀的理論研究成果,結(jié)合技術(shù)獲取型并購的特點(diǎn),本文將并購技術(shù)整合的過程主要分為三個(gè)階段,即技術(shù)甄別、技術(shù)遷移、技術(shù)重構(gòu),并將知識管理與技術(shù)整合過程相聯(lián)系,探索知識要素在整個(gè)并購過程中的識別、遷移、融合、創(chuàng)造過程�；谏鲜隼碚摲治�,并對中國制造業(yè)企業(yè)A公司、B公司、C公司的并購后技術(shù)整合成功案例進(jìn)行多案例分析,本文將探索基于知識管理的技術(shù)整合路徑,從整合過程和知識管理兩個(gè)維度描述中國制造業(yè)企業(yè)技術(shù)能力的演進(jìn)機(jī)制。本文發(fā)現(xiàn),目前中國制造業(yè)企業(yè)通過海外并購提升企業(yè)技術(shù)能力,將面臨“落后-引進(jìn)-再落后-再引進(jìn)”的怪圈。為了達(dá)成“中國制造2025”的目標(biāo),擺脫“大而不強(qiáng)”的制造業(yè)被動局面,中國制造業(yè)技術(shù)整合應(yīng)注重企業(yè)創(chuàng)造知識的能力的提升,向自主創(chuàng)新的方向前行。從本質(zhì)上看,制造企業(yè)并購后技術(shù)整合是一個(gè)精心設(shè)計(jì)的能力更新過程,通過整合跨越技術(shù)創(chuàng)新鴻溝,可以達(dá)到技術(shù)能力追趕甚至技術(shù)超越,而且推動了國家戰(zhàn)略轉(zhuǎn)型。
[Abstract]:At present, China's manufacturing industry is "big but not strong", the overall technical level is backward, independent innovation ability is weak. The gap between China and the world manufacturing power is mainly reflected in the lack of some key core technologies, and the supply-side reform of manufacturing industry is imperative. With the acceleration of economic globalization, mergers and acquisitions have undoubtedly become an important way for enterprises to enhance their competitiveness and gain rapid growth. But at the same time, mergers and acquisitions involve strategic planning and cultural integration. The level of organization management and the integration of mergers and acquisitions lead to the failure of mergers and acquisitions, and the high failure rate of mergers and acquisitions makes most enterprises prohibitive. As an important way for Chinese manufacturing enterprises to acquire core technology and improve their competitiveness, overseas M & A has a strong development momentum. However, the problem of how to improve the technological level and independent innovation ability of enterprises through M & A is still widespread. Based on the theory of merger and acquisition, the theory of technology integration, the theory of core competence and the theory of knowledge base, this paper absorbs and draws lessons from the research results of relevant literature at home and abroad. Using the research method of multi-case analysis and combining the theory of knowledge base view, this paper explores the general path of technological integration after M & A, and takes the overseas M & A event of Chinese manufacturing enterprises as a case study. This paper analyzes the problems and risks in various stages of M & A, and probes into the technical integration strategies which are beneficial to the technological innovation of Chinese manufacturing enterprises through overseas M & A. Knowledge is the essence of technology, the effective transfer, application and promotion of technology, is the process of knowledge transfer and promotion. The theory of knowledge based view is the theoretical basis for enterprises to acquire core technology through M & A and obtain competitiveness from the angle of knowledge. Technology integration is the way to explain how enterprises acquire technological innovation through M & A. According to the theoretical research results of knowledge based view and the characteristics of technology acquisition M & A, this paper divides the process of technology integration into three stages, namely, technology screening, technology transfer, technology reconstruction. Knowledge management is connected with the process of technology integration to explore the process of identifying, transferring, merging and creating knowledge elements in the whole process of M & A. Based on the above theoretical analysis, this paper will explore the path of technology integration based on knowledge management. This paper describes the evolution mechanism of the technological capability of Chinese manufacturing enterprises from the two dimensions of integration process and knowledge management. In this paper, it is found that at present, Chinese manufacturing enterprises will face the strange circle of "backwardness-introduction-again backwardness-reintroduction" if they upgrade their technological capability through overseas mergers and acquisitions. In order to achieve the goal of "made in China 2025" and get rid of the passive situation of "large but not strong" manufacturing industry, the technological integration of Chinese manufacturing industry should pay attention to the enhancement of enterprises' ability to create knowledge and move forward to the direction of independent innovation. In essence, technological integration after M & A of manufacturing enterprises is a carefully designed process of capability renewal. Through integration, technological capability can catch up with or even surpass the technological innovation gap, and it also promotes the strategic transformation of the country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F271;F425

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 池佳偉;;產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng)成長性研究[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年26期

2 劉洪偉;馮淳;;基于知識基礎(chǔ)觀的技術(shù)并購模式與創(chuàng)新績效關(guān)系實(shí)證研究[J];科技進(jìn)步與對策;2015年16期

3 陳菲瓊;陳珧;李飛;;技術(shù)獲取型海外并購中的資源相似性、互補(bǔ)性與創(chuàng)新表現(xiàn):整合程度及目標(biāo)方自主性的中介作用[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2015年07期

4 郝清民;任歡歡;;技術(shù)并購與研發(fā)的創(chuàng)新演進(jìn)績效研究[J];科技進(jìn)步與對策;2015年16期

5 劉志春;陳向東;;科技園區(qū)創(chuàng)新生態(tài)系統(tǒng)與創(chuàng)新效率關(guān)系研究[J];科研管理;2015年02期

6 吳先明;蘇志文;;將跨國并購作為技術(shù)追趕的杠桿:動態(tài)能力視角[J];管理世界;2014年04期

7 蘇志文;吳先明;;基于并購的動態(tài)能力對企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的作用機(jī)制——多案例研究[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年01期

8 張麗英;;技術(shù)并購與技術(shù)創(chuàng)新[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2013年03期

9 孫忠娟;謝偉;;中國企業(yè)技術(shù)并購的經(jīng)營業(yè)績研究[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2012年12期

10 李良成;陳明鳳;;基于技術(shù)尋求型跨國并購整合研究——以上汽并購羅孚為例[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 徐召紅;智力資本、動態(tài)能力對企業(yè)績效的作用研究[D];山東大學(xué);2014年

2 魏濤;中國企業(yè)海外并購動因分析及整合研究[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

3 雍蘭利;基于創(chuàng)新路徑的我國制藥企業(yè)自主創(chuàng)新實(shí)現(xiàn)機(jī)制研究[D];天津大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 費(fèi)佳婕;中國技術(shù)獲取型海外并購知識整合與創(chuàng)新績效研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2014年

2 張怡菲;基于核心能力的企業(yè)并購后整合模式研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2012年

3 宋志遠(yuǎn);中國企業(yè)技術(shù)獲取型海外并購技術(shù)整合風(fēng)險(xiǎn)研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2012年

4 魏建飛;中國制造業(yè)跨國并購風(fēng)險(xiǎn)研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2012年

5 殷萌萌;我國企業(yè)海外并購技術(shù)整合風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的生成與演化[D];浙江大學(xué);2011年

6 李艷梅;中國資源型企業(yè)海外并購風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：2075708