本文選題：礦產(chǎn)資源 + 優(yōu)化配置��； 參考：《中國礦業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：礦產(chǎn)資源是人類生存與社會(huì)發(fā)展的主要物質(zhì)基礎(chǔ)之一。進(jìn)入21世紀(jì)以來,隨著我國經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,工業(yè)化、城市化進(jìn)程的加快,對(duì)于礦產(chǎn)資源的需求迅速增長,由于礦產(chǎn)資源是不可再生資源的特殊性,礦產(chǎn)資源優(yōu)化配置一直都是全球性的研究熱點(diǎn)和難題。自建國以來,根據(jù)社會(huì)體制的轉(zhuǎn)變及經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,我國礦產(chǎn)資源優(yōu)化配置經(jīng)歷了計(jì)劃經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)期(1949年—1978年)、改革開放初期(1978年—1998年)、深化市場經(jīng)濟(jì)改革階段(1998年至今)三個(gè)階段,取得了可喜的成就。但隨著工業(yè)化進(jìn)程的加快,礦產(chǎn)資源消耗量持續(xù)增加,如何科學(xué)合理地管理和運(yùn)用礦產(chǎn)資源、促進(jìn)礦產(chǎn)資源的優(yōu)化配置已經(jīng)成為一個(gè)非常緊迫的課題。政策工具作為連接政策目標(biāo)和政策成果的紐帶,適當(dāng)政策工具的選擇有助于增強(qiáng)政策執(zhí)行力度,克服政策執(zhí)行可能遇到的困難,解決問題,從而有效的促進(jìn)政策目標(biāo)的實(shí)現(xiàn)。受政策問題界定、背景以及政策相關(guān)者等因素的影響,我國礦產(chǎn)資源優(yōu)化配置的政策工具在各時(shí)期的應(yīng)用既有相似性,也存在一定的差異性,所取得的效果也存在一定的差別。本文從時(shí)間維度將我國自建國以來國家對(duì)礦產(chǎn)資源管理的發(fā)展歷程劃分為三個(gè)階段并作為研究對(duì)象,通過構(gòu)建礦產(chǎn)資源優(yōu)化配置政策工具分析框架,分析比較各階段礦產(chǎn)資源優(yōu)化配置的政策工具使用情況,以自愿性政策工具、強(qiáng)制性政策工具、混合性政策工具作為理論基礎(chǔ),對(duì)各階段礦產(chǎn)資源優(yōu)化配置的政策工具進(jìn)行歸納和分類,同時(shí)分析建國以來我國政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化等社會(huì)環(huán)境的變化,探討礦產(chǎn)資源管理發(fā)展各階段影響政策工具選擇的因素,對(duì)各階段取得的成效進(jìn)行分析比較,歸納總結(jié),發(fā)現(xiàn)問題分析原因,并為今后的礦產(chǎn)資源優(yōu)化配置政策工具制定與選擇提出幾點(diǎn)建議。
[Abstract]:Mineral resources are one of the main material bases for human survival and social development. Since the beginning of the 21st century, with the development of economy, industrialization and the acceleration of urbanization, the demand for mineral resources has increased rapidly, because of the particularity of mineral resources as non-renewable resources. The optimal allocation of mineral resources has always been a global research hotspot and difficult problem. Since the founding of the people's Republic of China, in the light of the transformation of the social system and the development of the economy, The optimal allocation of mineral resources in China has experienced three stages: the planned economy period (1949-1978), the initial stage of reform and opening (1978-1998), and the stage of deepening the market economic reform (1998-present), and has made gratifying achievements. However, with the acceleration of industrialization, the consumption of mineral resources continues to increase. How to manage and utilize mineral resources scientifically and rationally, and how to promote the optimal allocation of mineral resources has become a very urgent issue. As a link between policy objectives and policy outcomes, the choice of appropriate policy tools helps to strengthen policy implementation, overcome possible difficulties in policy implementation and solve problems, thus effectively promoting the realization of policy objectives. Influenced by the definition of policy issues, background and policy stakeholders, the application of policy tools for optimizing the allocation of mineral resources in China has not only similarities, but also some differences, and there are some differences in the effect of the optimized allocation of mineral resources in China. In this paper, the development process of mineral resources management in China since the founding of the people's Republic of China has been divided into three stages from the time dimension and is regarded as the object of study. The analysis framework of the policy tools for optimizing the allocation of mineral resources is constructed. This paper analyzes and compares the use of policy tools for optimizing the allocation of mineral resources in various stages, taking voluntary policy tools, mandatory policy instruments and mixed policy instruments as the theoretical basis. This paper sums up and classifies the policy tools for optimizing the allocation of mineral resources in various stages, analyzes the changes in the social environment such as politics, economy, culture and so on since the founding of the people's Republic of China, and probes into the factors that affect the choice of policy tools in different stages of mineral resources management and development. This paper analyzes and compares the results obtained in various stages, summarizes and finds out the causes of the problems, and puts forward some suggestions for the formulation and selection of the policy tools for optimizing the allocation of mineral resources in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國礦業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F426.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 魏曉平;李媛;;礦產(chǎn)資源跨期優(yōu)化配置研究與展望[J];河北學(xué)刊;2015年01期

2 王炯輝;;明天的礦業(yè)——全球礦業(yè)勘探開發(fā)新趨勢[J];中國國土資源經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年11期

3 丁全利;;淺析我國近期礦產(chǎn)資源管理政策[J];中國礦業(yè);2012年05期

4 曲潔;;義務(wù)教育改革與發(fā)展的政策工具研究[J];復(fù)旦教育論壇;2011年05期

5 楊強(qiáng);萬會(huì);;立足我國礦情,完善礦產(chǎn)資源政策[J];礦產(chǎn)保護(hù)與利用;2010年02期

6 袁偉;;市場經(jīng)濟(jì)條件下政府優(yōu)化配置重要礦產(chǎn)資源方式研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;2010年02期

7 沈鐳;劉立濤;;中國能源政策可持續(xù)性評(píng)價(jià)與發(fā)展路徑選擇[J];資源科學(xué);2009年08期

8 謝雄標(biāo);嚴(yán)良;;礦產(chǎn)資源產(chǎn)業(yè)可持續(xù)發(fā)展研究綜述[J];中國國土資源經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年07期

9 黃紅華;;統(tǒng)籌城鄉(xiāng)就業(yè)中的政策工具——以浙江省湖州市為例[J];中國行政管理;2009年02期

10 黃忠敬;;教育政策工具的分類與選擇策略[J];國家教育行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年08期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 駱云;中國礦產(chǎn)資源勘查開發(fā)管理研究[D];長安大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 喻成杰;我國環(huán)境政策工具實(shí)施中的問題和優(yōu)化選擇研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2014年

2 榮冬梅;我國稀土資源優(yōu)化配置研究[D];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)（北京）;2013年

3 馬雪芹;我國政府市場化工具的選擇與應(yīng)用對(duì)策研究[D];電子科技大學(xué);2011年

4 舒皋甫;城鎮(zhèn)醫(yī)療保障體制改革政策工具研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2009年

5 鄧江波;我國環(huán)境保護(hù)視角下的政策工具選擇研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2009年

6 崔先維;政策網(wǎng)絡(luò)中政策工具的選擇：問題、對(duì)策及啟示[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1988721