本文選題：生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè) + 外商直接投資(FDI)��； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：黨的十八屆五中全會(huì)提出"中國(guó)制造2025"的戰(zhàn)略規(guī)劃,將制造業(yè)列為我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的重點(diǎn)。其中制造業(yè)效率的提升是制造業(yè)發(fā)展的重點(diǎn),而制造業(yè)效率的提升離不開相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)尤其是生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的發(fā)展而單獨(dú)實(shí)現(xiàn),現(xiàn)階段我國(guó)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展滯后,無法滿足制造業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)型的需要。與此同時(shí),隨著世界各國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)外開放程度的提高,跨國(guó)投資在服務(wù)業(yè)尤其是生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)增長(zhǎng)迅速。就我國(guó)而言,生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)外商直接投資(Foreign Direct Investment,簡(jiǎn)稱FDI,下同)的規(guī)模從2004年的62.99億美元增加到2015年的495.93億美元,總額增長(zhǎng)接近9倍。在此背景下,探究我國(guó)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI對(duì)制造業(yè)效率的影響具有重要意義。本文在相關(guān)理論基礎(chǔ)上分別從直接效應(yīng)和間接效應(yīng)角度上分析了生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI對(duì)制造業(yè)效率的影響機(jī)制,并對(duì)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI對(duì)制造業(yè)效率作用的影響因素進(jìn)行相應(yīng)分析。在理論研究的基礎(chǔ)上,構(gòu)建計(jì)量模型,運(yùn)用2004-2014年我國(guó)21個(gè)省市區(qū)域面板數(shù)據(jù),實(shí)證分析了生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI對(duì)制造業(yè)效率的影響效果,并從區(qū)域差異角度進(jìn)行比較分析。研究結(jié)果表明:從整體上看,生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI能夠顯著提升制造業(yè)效率,其中技術(shù)進(jìn)步效應(yīng)大于技術(shù)效率效應(yīng),且制造業(yè)FDI的增加、人力資本的提高、制度改善能夠促進(jìn)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI對(duì)制造業(yè)效率的提升;考慮區(qū)域的比較分析,通過實(shí)證結(jié)果得出,東部影響效果最佳,中部次之,西部影響效果不顯著;制造業(yè)FDI的增加、人力資本的提高、制度改善對(duì)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI促進(jìn)制造業(yè)效率的發(fā)揮存在區(qū)域差異;人力資本對(duì)制造業(yè)吸收生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI存在一定的門檻。最后,根據(jù)理論分析與實(shí)證研究結(jié)果,對(duì)我國(guó)利用生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI提高制造業(yè)效率及促進(jìn)效率的發(fā)揮提出建議。
[Abstract]:The Fifth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee put forward the strategic plan of "made in China 2025", which listed manufacturing industry as the focus of China's economic development. The promotion of manufacturing efficiency is the focus of manufacturing industry development, and the improvement of manufacturing efficiency can not be separated from the development of related industries, especially producer services. At the present stage, the development of producer services in China lags behind. Unable to meet the needs of manufacturing transformation. At the same time, with the improvement of the service industry opening to the outside world, transnational investment in the service industry, especially producer services, is growing rapidly. As far as China is concerned, the scale of foreign direct investment in producer services has increased from $6.299 billion in 2004 to $49.593 billion in 2015, an increase of nearly nine times. In this context, it is of great significance to explore the impact of FDI on manufacturing efficiency in China. On the basis of relevant theories, this paper analyzes the influence mechanism of producer service industry (FDI) on manufacturing efficiency from the angle of direct effect and indirect effect, and analyzes the influencing factors of producer service FDI on manufacturing efficiency. On the basis of theoretical research, this paper constructs an econometric model, using the regional panel data of 21 provinces and cities in China from 2004 to 2014, to empirically analyze the effect of producer service industry (FDI) on manufacturing efficiency, and make a comparative analysis from the angle of regional difference. The results show that, on the whole, producer service industry (FDI) can significantly improve the efficiency of manufacturing industry, in which the effect of technological progress is greater than that of technological efficiency, and the increase of manufacturing FDI and the improvement of human capital. Institutional improvement can promote the efficiency of producer service industry (FDI) in manufacturing industry. Considering the regional comparative analysis, the empirical results show that the eastern effect is the best, the central one is the second, and the western impact effect is not significant, and the manufacturing FDI is increasing. With the improvement of human capital, there are regional differences in how the system improves the FDI of producer services to promote the efficiency of manufacturing, and there is a certain threshold for human capital to absorb FDI of producer services. Finally, according to the theoretical analysis and empirical research results, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to improve manufacturing efficiency and promote efficiency by using producer service industry (FDI).
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F719;F424

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 饒華;李小紅;;江西先進(jìn)制造業(yè)與生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)融合發(fā)展探析[J];科技經(jīng)濟(jì)市場(chǎng);2012年05期

2 韓涌;;遼寧省生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)和裝備制造業(yè)融合發(fā)展的對(duì)策淺析[J];企業(yè)導(dǎo)報(bào);2013年17期

3 王波;;沈陽市生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展的路徑選擇[J];沈陽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年03期

4 李勇;李元雪;;安徽省生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展問題研究[J];淮南師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年03期

5 孫永波;;我國(guó)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展存在的問題及對(duì)策研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;2009年03期

6 王浩;;關(guān)于推進(jìn)我市生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展的對(duì)策研究[J];大連干部學(xué)刊;2012年09期

7 歐清銘;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展趨勢(shì)探析[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2011年02期

8 楊麗偉;;上海發(fā)展生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)策研究[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2011年02期

9 熊杰;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與集群制造業(yè)關(guān)系研究綜述[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2010年31期

10 劉玉強(qiáng);劉雪暉;王東梅;;加快發(fā)展遼寧生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè) 提高裝備制造業(yè)的核心競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力[J];遼寧經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 溫曉麗;魏亞男;宋帥官;;沈陽市裝備制造業(yè)與生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)互動(dòng)發(fā)展的對(duì)策建議[A];第十屆沈陽科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集（經(jīng)濟(jì)管理與人文科學(xué)分冊(cè)）[C];2013年

2 段杰;張燕;;深港生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀及比較研究[A];和諧城市規(guī)劃——2007中國(guó)城市規(guī)劃年會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 江茜;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)農(nóng)業(yè)效率的影響研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2016年

2 肖志萍;我國(guó)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI對(duì)制造業(yè)效率影響研究[D];山東大學(xué);2017年

3 劉璐;廣西生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展能力研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2014年

4 席芳沁;全球價(jià)值鏈下我國(guó)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展研究[D];天津商業(yè)大學(xué);2013年

5 劉小川;CEPA框架下加強(qiáng)粵港生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)合作的問題研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2010年

6 黃志宇;FDI對(duì)我國(guó)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚影響的研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1840456