【摘要】：近年來,由注冊(cè)商標(biāo)與企業(yè)名稱權(quán)利沖突引起的糾紛層出不窮,數(shù)量呈明顯上升趨勢(shì),且愈演愈烈�！皬埿∪�、“同仁堂”、“亨得利”、“金華火腿”、“蒙牛”等知名企業(yè)名稱或商標(biāo)都發(fā)生過這類糾紛。由于我國(guó)現(xiàn)行相關(guān)法律法規(guī)的不足,加上在經(jīng)濟(jì)利益的驅(qū)使下,利用他人商標(biāo)權(quán)或企業(yè)名稱權(quán)“搭便車”的行為越來越多。注冊(cè)商標(biāo)與企業(yè)名稱權(quán)沖突引起的種種糾紛,不僅使企業(yè)的合法權(quán)益遭到侵蝕、消費(fèi)者的利益因此受損,而且影響了市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)秩序,惡化了市場(chǎng)環(huán)境。因此,注冊(cè)商標(biāo)與企業(yè)名稱的權(quán)利沖突已經(jīng)成為我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)中一個(gè)無法回避并亟待解決的問題。 本文由引言、正文、結(jié)論三部分組成,其中正文分為三章。 第一章為“注冊(cè)商標(biāo)與企業(yè)名稱權(quán)利的產(chǎn)生及其權(quán)利沖突”。該章從兩種權(quán)利的產(chǎn)生及二者的聯(lián)系和區(qū)別入手,解析產(chǎn)生沖突的五個(gè)原因及沖突的三種表現(xiàn)形式,為下文的進(jìn)一步論述提供理論基礎(chǔ)。 第二章為“注冊(cè)商標(biāo)與企業(yè)名稱權(quán)利沖突的認(rèn)定及其解決方案”。該章論述了認(rèn)定商標(biāo)權(quán)與企業(yè)名稱權(quán)構(gòu)成權(quán)利沖突的兩大因素以及解決權(quán)利沖突應(yīng)遵循的原則,并結(jié)合經(jīng)典案例做實(shí)證研究,重點(diǎn)剖析在此類權(quán)利沖突的解決中面臨的幾個(gè)關(guān)鍵問題。 第三章為“我國(guó)現(xiàn)行相關(guān)法律制度的不足與完善”。該章在全面剖析我國(guó)法律制度的不足與缺陷后,提出解決我國(guó)注冊(cè)商標(biāo)和企業(yè)名稱權(quán)利沖突的一些建議,包括確立商號(hào)權(quán)、統(tǒng)一商標(biāo)與商號(hào)的保護(hù)、完善協(xié)助執(zhí)行制度以及建立相應(yīng)的協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:In recent years, disputes caused by the conflict between registered trademarks and enterprise name rights have emerged one after another, and the number has shown an obvious upward trend, and has become more and more serious. Such disputes have occurred in the names or trademarks of well-known enterprises such as Zhang Koizumi, Tongren Hall, Hendley, Jinhua Ham and Mengniu. Due to the shortcomings of the current relevant laws and regulations in our country, and driven by economic interests, there are more and more behaviors of using other people's trademark rights or enterprise name rights to "hitchhike". All kinds of disputes caused by the conflict between registered trademark and enterprise name right not only erode the legitimate rights and interests of enterprises, but also affect the order of market competition and deteriorate the market environment. Therefore, the conflict of rights between registered trademark and enterprise name has become an unavoidable and urgent problem in the protection of intellectual property rights in our country. This paper consists of three parts: introduction, main body and conclusion, in which the main body is divided into three chapters. The first chapter is the emergence and conflict of registered Trademark and Enterprise name Rights. Starting with the emergence of the two rights and the relationship and difference between the two, this chapter analyzes the five causes of the conflict and the three forms of the conflict, which provides a theoretical basis for the further discussion below. The second chapter is the cognizance and solution of the conflict between registered Trademark and Enterprise name Rights. This chapter discusses the two factors that determine the conflict of rights between trademark right and enterprise name right and the principles to be followed in solving the conflict of rights, and makes an empirical study in combination with classical cases. This paper focuses on the analysis of several key problems in the resolution of this kind of conflict of rights. The third chapter is "the deficiency and perfection of the current relevant legal system in our country". After comprehensively analyzing the shortcomings and defects of the legal system of our country, this chapter puts forward some suggestions to solve the conflict between the registered trademark and the enterprise name right in our country, including the establishment of the trade name right and the unification of the protection of the trademark and the trade name. Improve the assistance implementation system and establish the corresponding coordination mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廈門大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923.43

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 潘偉;論商號(hào)權(quán)與商標(biāo)權(quán)的權(quán)利沖突[J];中華商標(biāo);2001年08期

2 劉紅;基于衡平理念探析知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突[J];中華商標(biāo);2004年07期

3 李弟平;;解決商標(biāo)與商號(hào)權(quán)利沖突的利益協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制[J];中華商標(biāo);2008年12期

4 楊葉璇;;修改商標(biāo)法應(yīng)當(dāng)加大維護(hù)誠(chéng)實(shí)信用原則的力度[J];中華商標(biāo);2009年06期

5 田燕;;突出使用字號(hào)與注冊(cè)商標(biāo)沖突構(gòu)成侵權(quán)[J];中華商標(biāo);2009年10期

6 孫東雅;商標(biāo)與企業(yè)名稱沖突若干問題研究[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年07期

7 郭洪波;商標(biāo)權(quán)與其它標(biāo)識(shí)性知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突問題研究[J];法學(xué);2005年09期

8 程昕;;特定歷史淵源注冊(cè)商標(biāo)與企業(yè)名稱沖突問題研究[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬);2012年01期

9 鄭成思;必要與不必要的界定——我國(guó)《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》與《商標(biāo)法》的交叉與重疊[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;1998年07期

10 金關(guān)明;;商標(biāo)權(quán)和企業(yè)名稱權(quán)的沖突與解決機(jī)制新探[J];中國(guó)工商管理研究;2009年10期

，

本文編號(hào)：2495309