反壟斷適用除外制度與科技創(chuàng)新關(guān)系研究
[Abstract]:The innovation and competition of science and technology has become an important part of the world economic development, and scientific and technological innovation has represented the core competitive force of the national science and technology level. Due to the late start of scientific and technological innovation in China, in view of the world pattern in the field of scientific and technological innovation, China has formulated the goal of "building an innovative country". How to encourage scientific and technological innovation from the legal system and regulate the monopoly behavior carried out in the name of scientific and technological innovation, so as to improve the strength of scientific and technological innovation in China, is an important issue that we need to study. Based on the analysis of the rationality of encouraging scientific and technological innovation by the anti-monopoly exclusion system, this paper analyzes and compares the development and present situation of the anti-monopoly exclusion system in the field of scientific and technological innovation at home and abroad. From a new point of view, this paper puts forward some suggestions for the perfection of anti-monopoly application exclusion system in the field of scientific and technological innovation in China. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part is the introduction, which focuses on the introduction of the research background, the significance of the topic, as well as the research methods and innovations; The second part is based on the analysis of the value pursuit of the exclusion system of anti-monopoly application, and discusses the rationality of the exclusion system of anti-monopoly application combined with the ways of encouraging scientific and technological innovation of the exclusion system of anti-monopoly application. The third part analyzes the specific cases of abuse of antitrust exclusion system in the field of science and technology at home and abroad, to explore the motivation of those enterprises that carry out monopoly behavior in the name of scientific and technological innovation, in order to fundamentally analyze the causes of such abuse. The fourth part provides reference for the improvement of antimonopoly application exclusion system in our country by comparing and analyzing the anti-monopoly application exclusion system in developed countries outside the country, and puts forward some concrete measures for the improvement of the anti-monopoly application exclusion system in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號(hào)】:D922.294
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 孫晉;;我國《反壟斷法》法律責(zé)任制度的缺失及其完善[J];法律適用;2009年11期
2 時(shí)建中;;我國《反壟斷法》的特色制度、亮點(diǎn)制度及重大不足[J];法學(xué)家;2008年01期
3 齊虹麗;政府規(guī)制與反壟斷法的適用除外制度——以日本反壟斷法中的適用除外制度為討論中心[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2004年06期
4 呂明瑜;;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)許可中的壟斷控制[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2009年06期
5 王夢(mèng);;論美國反壟斷法發(fā)展歷程對(duì)中國的啟示[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年12期
6 黃勇;;中國《反壟斷法》中的豁免與適用除外[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期
7 宋晶晶;;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的立法規(guī)制——以反壟斷法為視角[J];華南理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年06期
8 張偉君;;專利強(qiáng)制許可制度的合理性分析[J];科學(xué)管理研究;2009年04期
9 陸周莉,李少鵬;美德反壟斷法適用除外制度比較[J];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年S2期
10 韓永紅;;歐盟競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法豁免制度及對(duì)我國的啟示[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年09期
,本文編號(hào):2487255
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2487255.html