【摘要】：這是一個知識經(jīng)濟和經(jīng)濟全球化的時代，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)被用作貿(mào)易競爭手段的巨大威力已為人所見證，人們對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的關(guān)注也從“保護”到“保護與濫用”并重。然而，目前針對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的法律規(guī)定只有《反壟斷法》，學者們也多是從反壟斷法的角度來分析知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的濫用。這種認識具有局限性，違反反壟斷法只不過是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的一種類型，而非惟一。 本文試圖跳出反壟斷法，以知識產(chǎn)權(quán)是民事權(quán)利為基點，將權(quán)利不得濫用原則引入知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域，界定知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的內(nèi)涵、分析了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的要件、類型及法律規(guī)制方法，最后針對我國法律的現(xiàn)狀提出了法律建議。 本文的結(jié)構(gòu)分為五個部分。 第一部分是問題的提出，引出了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的問題、研究意義及研究路徑。 第二部分是權(quán)利不得濫用原則的基礎理論研究。 第三部分是權(quán)利不得濫用之證成。首先說明多數(shù)人從反壟斷角度來闡述知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用問題，后指出這種觀點的局限性，并基于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)是民事權(quán)利，繼而將知識產(chǎn)權(quán)置于權(quán)利不得濫用原則之下分析并用案例佐證。 第四部分是通過權(quán)利不得濫用原則對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的規(guī)制。這部分主要介紹了權(quán)利不得濫用原則的內(nèi)涵、歷史，隨后闡述絕對權(quán)、相對權(quán)分類直接影響了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用三種類型的形成，即：一是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)作為絕對權(quán)行使，侵害他人利益；二是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)人通過合同授予他人相對權(quán)來行使，利用優(yōu)勢并對另一方當事人施加不正當影響；三是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)人通過合同授予他人相對權(quán)來行使，損害了公共利益。 在如何判定“濫用”的標準上，本文采納“不顧權(quán)利目的說”，認為權(quán)利的設置都具有社會目的，或表現(xiàn)為他人的利益，或表現(xiàn)為社會利益，用目的來去界定權(quán)利正當行使和濫用的界限是清晰，另外輔以“過錯原則”和“損害”即可完成對權(quán)利濫用的責任認定。將上述原理應用到知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域，提出了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的要件、類型、規(guī)制方式。 第五部分是結(jié)論。針對現(xiàn)行《反壟斷法》規(guī)定對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的不足，提出兩點建議：（1）將知識產(chǎn)權(quán)不得濫用原則列為民法中的權(quán)利不得濫用原則的下位法原則，并在具體法規(guī)中開宗明義的宣示：禁止專利權(quán)濫用，禁止著作權(quán)濫用、禁止商標權(quán)濫用和禁止技術(shù)秘密權(quán)濫用等。（2）頒布司法解釋，明確知識產(chǎn)權(quán)不得濫用的構(gòu)成要件，將知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用行為類型化，采用不同法律方式規(guī)制。
[Abstract]:This is an era of knowledge economy and economic globalization, intellectual property rights have been witnessed as a means of trade competition, people pay attention to intellectual property rights from "protection" to "protection and abuse". However, at present, there are only Anti-Monopoly Law for the abuse of intellectual property. Scholars also analyze the abuse of intellectual property from the perspective of Anti-monopoly Law. This recognition has limitations, and the violation of antitrust law is only one type of intellectual property abuse, not the only one. This paper attempts to break out of antitrust law and introduce the principle of non-abuse of rights into the field of intellectual property rights based on the fact that intellectual property rights are civil rights, define the connotation of abuse of intellectual property rights, and analyze the elements of abuse of intellectual property rights. Types and legal regulation methods, finally, according to the current legal situation of our country put forward legal suggestions. The structure of this paper is divided into five parts. The first part is the problem of intellectual property abuse, the significance of the research and the research path. The second part is the basic theory research of the principle of non-abuse of rights. The third part is the proof that the right should not be abused. First, it is explained that most people elaborate on the abuse of intellectual property from the perspective of anti-monopoly, and then points out the limitations of this view, and based on the fact that intellectual property is a civil right, Intellectual property rights are then placed under the principle of non-abuse of rights and analyzed and corroborated by cases. The fourth part is the regulation of the abuse of intellectual property rights through the principle of non-abuse of rights. This part mainly introduces the connotation and history of the principle of non-abuse of rights, then expounds the absolute rights and the classification of relative rights directly affects the formation of three types of abuse of intellectual property rights, namely: first, the exercise of intellectual property rights as absolute rights; Infringe on the interests of others; The other is that the intellectual property right person exercises the relative right through the contract, makes use of the advantage and exerts improper influence on the other party; the third is that the intellectual property right person exercises the relative right through the contract award to others, which damages the public interest. On the criterion of how to judge "abuse", this article adopts the theory of "disregard for the purpose of right", and thinks that the setting of right has social purpose, either as the interests of others, or as social interests. It is clear to define the boundary between the proper exercise and abuse of the right with the purpose. In addition, "fault principle" and "damage" can be used to determine the responsibility for the abuse of the right. Applying the above principles to the field of intellectual property rights, this paper puts forward the elements, types and regulations of abuse of intellectual property rights. The fifth part is the conclusion. In view of the deficiency of the provisions of the current Anti-monopoly Law on the abuse of intellectual property rights, two suggestions are put forward: (1) the principle of non-abuse of intellectual property rights is listed as the principle of subordinate law of the principle of non-abuse of rights in civil law. And in the specific laws and regulations, it is stated that the abuse of patent right, copyright abuse, trademark right abuse and technology secret right abuse are prohibited. (2) the judicial interpretation is promulgated to clarify the constituent elements of the prohibition of abuse of intellectual property rights. The abuse of intellectual property rights will be typed and regulated by different legal methods.
【學位授予單位】：華中科技大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.4;D922.294

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王先林;關(guān)注知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用問題[J];安徽科技;2004年03期

2 費安玲;;羅馬法對所有權(quán)限制之探微[J];比較法研究;2010年03期

3 李明德;;“知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用”是一個模糊命題[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年10期

4 李琛;;禁止知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的若干基本問題研究[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年12期

5 郭壽康;萬勇;;中國外貿(mào)法限制知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用措施制度研究[J];法學家;2005年05期

6 韓立余;;反壟斷法規(guī)范知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的特點與局限——以歐美微軟案為視角[J];暨南學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年02期

7 汪淵智;論禁止權(quán)利濫用原則[J];法學研究;1995年05期

8 易繼明;評財產(chǎn)權(quán)勞動學說[J];法學研究;2000年03期

9 易繼明;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的觀念:類型化及法律適用[J];法學研究;2005年03期

10 方新軍;;權(quán)利概念的歷史[J];法學研究;2007年04期

，

本文編號：2454134