【摘要】：隨著現(xiàn)代高新知識產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展和信息時代的來臨，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)已成為權(quán)衡一個企業(yè)生命力及競爭力的重要標(biāo)志。我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易市場運行多年來創(chuàng)造了巨大的經(jīng)濟價值，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易體系建設(shè)迅速，成效明顯。然而，由于世界知識經(jīng)濟的興起，以及國家經(jīng)濟刺激方案的出臺，國民生產(chǎn)總值增長速度的迅速下降使制造業(yè)的危機日益凸顯。特別是在由美國次貸危機引發(fā)的全球金融危機正在向?qū)嶓w經(jīng)濟迅速擴展的背景下，，世界各國都在啟動新一輪大規(guī)模的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易投資，世界級的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易體系建設(shè)發(fā)展迅速。國內(nèi)的理論界和實踐界對中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易中介機構(gòu)定位涉及的一系列法律問題的研究需求也日益迫切。本文以此為背景，從法律層面就如何推進我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易中介機構(gòu)健康發(fā)展進行了研究。 首先，本文從知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易中介機構(gòu)的概念和類別入手，分析了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易中介機構(gòu)發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀和存在的問題。其次，文章針對我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)中介市場存在的法律制度尚不健全，服務(wù)層次較低，條塊分割現(xiàn)象嚴(yán)重，從業(yè)人員數(shù)量不足、素質(zhì)較低、資金來源少，組織管理體制尚待健全，市場開放程度低等現(xiàn)象從法律的角度對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易中介機構(gòu)的法律性質(zhì)進行再分析。在明確了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易中介機構(gòu)的功能定位之后文章對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易中介機構(gòu)的發(fā)展前景做了有益的探討。文章指出要實現(xiàn)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易中介機構(gòu)業(yè)務(wù)的綜合化、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的統(tǒng)一化、規(guī)范的法制化、服務(wù)形式的電子化這一發(fā)展的大趨勢，除了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易中介機構(gòu)本身要加快產(chǎn)業(yè)的轉(zhuǎn)型升級外，政府應(yīng)當(dāng)積極優(yōu)化對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易中介行業(yè)的宏觀調(diào)控，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易中介行業(yè)協(xié)會也應(yīng)當(dāng)加強自律管理。最后，文章在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易中介法律制度建設(shè)方面，就如何健全知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易法律制度、完善知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易法治體系、降低知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易政策法律風(fēng)險等問題進行了有益的思考。筆者相信，只有多方共同努力，才能推動知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易市場的持續(xù)健康發(fā)展，實現(xiàn)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)強國的中國夢。
[Abstract]:With the development of modern high-tech knowledge industry and the advent of the information age, intellectual property has become an important symbol to weigh the vitality and competitiveness of an enterprise. Over the years, China's intellectual property trading market has created great economic value, and the intellectual property trading system has been built rapidly and has achieved remarkable results. However, due to the rise of the world's knowledge economy and the introduction of the national economic stimulus plan, the rapid decline in the growth rate of the gross national product (GNP) makes the crisis in the manufacturing industry increasingly prominent. Especially against the background that the global financial crisis caused by the US subprime mortgage crisis is rapidly expanding into the real economy, countries around the world are launching a new round of large-scale investment in intellectual property transactions. The construction of the world-class intellectual property trading system has developed rapidly. The domestic theoretical and practical circles are increasingly demanding to study a series of legal issues involved in the positioning of China's intellectual property transaction intermediaries. Based on this background, this paper studies how to promote the healthy development of China's intellectual property transaction intermediaries from the legal level. First of all, this paper starts with the concept and category of intellectual property transaction intermediary, and analyzes the present situation and existing problems of the development of intellectual property transaction intermediary. Secondly, the legal system of intellectual property intermediary market in China is not perfect, the level of service is low, the phenomenon of fragmentation is serious, the number of employees is insufficient, the quality is low, the source of funds is few, and the system of organization and management is still to be perfected. The low degree of market opening reanalyzes the legal nature of intellectual property transaction intermediaries from the legal point of view. After defining the function orientation of the intellectual property transaction intermediary, this paper makes a beneficial discussion on the development prospect of the intellectual property right transaction intermediary. The article points out that it is necessary to realize the development trend of the integration, the unification of the standards, the legalization of the norms and the electronization of the form of service, which are the main trends of the business of the intermediary agencies of intellectual property transactions. In addition to speeding up the transformation and upgrading of the industry, the government should actively optimize the macro-control of the intellectual property transaction intermediary industry, and the intellectual property transaction intermediary trade association should also strengthen the self-regulation and management. Finally, the article in the intellectual property transaction intermediary legal system construction, on how to improve the intellectual property transaction legal system, improve the intellectual property transaction rule of law system, Reduce the intellectual property rights transaction policy legal risk and other issues to carry on the beneficial consideration. I believe that only by working together, can we promote the sustainable and healthy development of the intellectual property trading market, and realize the intellectual property power Chinese Dream.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳蕾;;我國科技中介服務(wù)機構(gòu)在區(qū)域創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)中的作用及其發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略研究[J];白城師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年01期

2 陳長永;陳曉楓;汪力夫;;我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易市場建設(shè)與發(fā)展初探[J];產(chǎn)權(quán)導(dǎo)刊;2008年09期

3 常曉明;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易市場的創(chuàng)新與發(fā)展[J];中國科技投資;2008年02期

4 胡曉平,王培根;我國科技中介服務(wù)機構(gòu)戰(zhàn)略性發(fā)展問題探討[J];科技和產(chǎn)業(yè);2004年08期

5 陳宇萍;魏慶華;袁攀;;廣東知識產(chǎn)權(quán)服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀及對策研究[J];廣東科技;2011年22期

6 關(guān)永紅;劉卓拉;;論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)服務(wù)業(yè)的行業(yè)范圍與發(fā)展?fàn)顩r——以廣東知識產(chǎn)權(quán)服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展為視角[J];廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2011年03期

7 余國揚;廣州發(fā)展知識經(jīng)濟的思路與對策[J];廣州師院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2000年10期

8 郭民生;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易體系建設(shè)的幾個基本問題[J];國有資產(chǎn)管理;2009年03期

9 朱玉榮;;日本知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略及對我國的啟示[J];黑龍江對外經(jīng)貿(mào);2009年02期

10 蔣愛玲;中介服務(wù)機構(gòu)的體系、功能及其運作特點——從香港的經(jīng)驗談起[J];上海經(jīng)濟研究;2001年09期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 中關(guān)村技術(shù)產(chǎn)權(quán)交易所 梁雨 深圳國際高新技術(shù)交易所 朱恒元;[N];科技日報;2003年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 董正英;技術(shù)交易、中介與中國技術(shù)市場發(fā)展[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2003年

2 劉向陽;中國產(chǎn)權(quán)交易市場研究[D];中共中央黨校;2007年

3 封泉明;中國跨國公司自主知識產(chǎn)權(quán)培育研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2012年

本文編號：2453846