【摘要】：歷史上看，傳播技術(shù)的發(fā)展必然會(huì)導(dǎo)致著作權(quán)法的更新。印刷術(shù)的出現(xiàn)產(chǎn)生了復(fù)制權(quán)，錄音錄像設(shè)備的出現(xiàn)產(chǎn)生了出租權(quán)，由于信息技術(shù)和網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳輸技術(shù)的發(fā)展，催生了信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)……云計(jì)算作為最新的科學(xué)技術(shù)，是對(duì)傳統(tǒng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的變革，其出現(xiàn)改變了人們產(chǎn)生、傳遞和分享信息的方式。本文試圖從國(guó)際上云計(jì)算最新的判例出發(fā)，，結(jié)合我國(guó)立法及司法實(shí)踐，探討云計(jì)算對(duì)我國(guó)著作權(quán)法的挑戰(zhàn)及我國(guó)完善相關(guān)立法的建議。 第一章主要對(duì)云計(jì)算的定義及其模式進(jìn)行概述，以及此項(xiàng)對(duì)著作權(quán)法的總體影響。云計(jì)算主要分為三大模式：IaaS模式，PaaS模式和SaaS模式，其中SaaS模式與用戶(hù)的關(guān)系最為密切，也是產(chǎn)生著作權(quán)問(wèn)題最多的模式。在此環(huán)境下形成的緩存、臨時(shí)復(fù)制問(wèn)題以及其他傳播技術(shù)的問(wèn)題，使得包括美國(guó)在內(nèi)的國(guó)家都尋求各種方式解決新技術(shù)對(duì)著作權(quán)法的影響。 第二章立足我國(guó)立法和司法實(shí)踐，分析云計(jì)算對(duì)我國(guó)著作權(quán)法的沖擊主要集中在三個(gè)問(wèn)題：信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)、復(fù)制權(quán)及出租權(quán)。我國(guó)信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)源自國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)組織的兩個(gè)公約，然而在權(quán)利名稱(chēng)上卻與別不同。這樣的名稱(chēng)難以涵蓋目前三網(wǎng)融合的環(huán)境以及未來(lái)技術(shù)的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展。而且我國(guó)信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播在權(quán)利內(nèi)容上也有需要進(jìn)一步厘清的必要。臨時(shí)復(fù)制在電子技術(shù)和信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)出現(xiàn)開(kāi)始就一直存在爭(zhēng)議，云計(jì)算使得臨時(shí)復(fù)制成為常態(tài)，如此再把臨時(shí)復(fù)制拒絕在復(fù)制權(quán)外也顯得不合時(shí)宜。在云計(jì)算SaaS模式使得軟件使用行為發(fā)生轉(zhuǎn)變，當(dāng)前的信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)難以涵蓋這一內(nèi)容。對(duì)于這種行為不應(yīng)再通過(guò)信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)規(guī)制，而是應(yīng)當(dāng)選擇其他權(quán)利去規(guī)制這一行為。 第三章通過(guò)各種學(xué)說(shuō)的對(duì)比分析和比較法研究，對(duì)我國(guó)當(dāng)前遇到的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)問(wèn)題提出相關(guān)建議：為適應(yīng)科技的發(fā)展和加強(qiáng)全球知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)交流，應(yīng)當(dāng)對(duì)信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的定義進(jìn)行相關(guān)調(diào)整，將其名稱(chēng)變成對(duì)公眾傳播權(quán)并且對(duì)權(quán)利內(nèi)容進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步厘清。臨時(shí)復(fù)制根據(jù)其產(chǎn)生的特征分成技術(shù)性臨時(shí)復(fù)制和非技術(shù)性臨時(shí)復(fù)制兩種，非技術(shù)性臨時(shí)復(fù)制應(yīng)當(dāng)在復(fù)制權(quán)的調(diào)整范圍內(nèi)。SaaS模式下的軟件使用行為將會(huì)成為未來(lái)軟件使用的一個(gè)重要形式，通過(guò)網(wǎng)絡(luò)進(jìn)行交付的軟件使用可以通過(guò)擴(kuò)張出租權(quán)，即通過(guò)電子出租權(quán)對(duì)此行為進(jìn)行規(guī)制。
[Abstract]:Historically, the development of communication technology will inevitably lead to the renewal of copyright law. The emergence of printing produces the right of reproduction and the appearance of audio and video recording equipment gives rise to the right to rent. Because of the development of information technology and network transmission technology, the right of information transmission on the network is given birth to. Cloud computing, as the latest science and technology, is a revolution to the traditional network technology, which changes the way that people produce, transmit and share information. This paper attempts to discuss the challenges of cloud computing to China's copyright law and the suggestions to perfect the relevant legislation from the latest cases of cloud computing in the world, combined with the legislation and judicial practice of our country. The first chapter summarizes the definition and mode of cloud computing, and its overall impact on copyright law. Cloud computing is mainly divided into three modes: IaaS mode, PaaS mode and SaaS mode. Among them, the SaaS model is the most closely related to users, and it is also the mode that produces the most copyright problems. The problems of caching, temporary replication and other communication technologies in this environment have led countries, including the United States, to seek ways to resolve the impact of new technologies on copyright law. The second chapter analyzes the impact of cloud computing on China's copyright law based on our legislation and judicial practice. It focuses on three issues: the right to information network dissemination, the right to copy and the right to rent out. The right of information network communication in China originates from the two conventions of the International intellectual property Organization (WIPO), but the name of the right is different from that of the other. Such a name is difficult to cover the current three-network convergence environment and the further development of future technology. Moreover, it is necessary to clarify the right content of information network communication in our country. Temporary replication has been controversial since the emergence of electronic technology and information network technology. Cloud computing makes temporary replication the norm, so it is inappropriate to reject temporary replication outside the right of replication. In the cloud computing SaaS mode, the behavior of software usage is changed, which is difficult to be covered by the current information network dissemination right. This kind of behavior should not be regulated by information network transmission right, but should be regulated by other rights. In the third chapter, through the comparative analysis and comparative study of various theories, the author puts forward some suggestions on intellectual property issues in China: to adapt to the development of science and technology and to strengthen the global intellectual property exchange. The definition of information network communication right should be adjusted to change its name into public communication right and clarify the content of the right. Temporary replication is divided into technical temporary replication and non-technical temporary replication according to the characteristics it produces. The behavior of software usage in SaaS mode will become an important form of software use in the future. Namely through the electronic rental right to regulate this behavior.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 于志良;;云計(jì)算現(xiàn)狀研究[J];電腦開(kāi)發(fā)與應(yīng)用;2010年10期

2 朱理;;臨時(shí)復(fù)制是否屬于著作權(quán)法意義上的復(fù)制——以國(guó)際公約為核心的規(guī)范分析[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年01期

3 彭強(qiáng);魏森;;對(duì)云計(jì)算知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的思考[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年12期

4 彭學(xué)龍;;論著作權(quán)語(yǔ)境下的獲取權(quán)[J];法商研究;2010年04期

5 馮曉青;付繼存;;著作權(quán)法中的復(fù)制權(quán)研究[J];法學(xué)家;2011年03期

6 王遷;;論“網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播行為”的界定及其侵權(quán)認(rèn)定[J];法學(xué);2006年05期

7 梁志文;;云計(jì)算、技術(shù)中立與版權(quán)責(zé)任[J];法學(xué);2011年03期

8 劉迪;;淺析云計(jì)算下的版權(quán)技術(shù)保護(hù)措施[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬);2012年05期

9 董穎;;解決云計(jì)算SaaS模式下版權(quán)問(wèn)題的另一途徑[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年12期

10 張今;郭斯倫;;著作財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)體系的反思與重構(gòu)[J];法商研究;2012年04期

本文編號(hào)：2352408