發(fā)布時間：2018-11-07 16:49

【摘要】：在當(dāng)代,技術(shù)與資本既是現(xiàn)代社會發(fā)展的推動力量,又是現(xiàn)代性的根源所在。技術(shù)哲學(xué)界長期以來側(cè)重于對技術(shù)工具理性的批判,而疏于對資本邏輯的批判。單純對科學(xué)技術(shù)本身的批判可以從中獲得必要的思想力量,但是缺乏的是物質(zhì)力量。只有從資本邏輯的角度研究科學(xué)技術(shù),才能獲得真正的物質(zhì)力量,即批判的武器和武器的批判相結(jié)合。因此,對技術(shù)和資本互動的歷史與邏輯的考察一方面是技術(shù)哲學(xué)理論研究旨趣所在,另一方面也是技術(shù)哲學(xué)面對現(xiàn)代性的積極應(yīng)答。 首先,論文對技術(shù)和資本的形態(tài)進(jìn)行了共時性和歷時態(tài)的考察。概括出社會需求和以產(chǎn)權(quán)制度為核心的社會經(jīng)濟(jì)關(guān)系二者的合力推動了技術(shù)的發(fā)展。在產(chǎn)權(quán)制度中,關(guān)鍵的要素是所有制,而資本的產(chǎn)權(quán)歸屬是所有制的焦點(diǎn)�？萍几锩唾Y本形成的機(jī)制體制創(chuàng)新的合力推動了資本形態(tài)的發(fā)展。 其次,論文以三次科技革命為主線,考察了技術(shù)與資本互動在不同歷史階段的表現(xiàn)形式。蒸汽時代,二者的互動體現(xiàn)為相互促進(jìn),表現(xiàn)為工藝學(xué)、工廠制度；電氣時代,二者的互動表現(xiàn)為融合,體現(xiàn)為工業(yè)實(shí)驗(yàn)室、現(xiàn)代企業(yè)制度；信息時代,二者的互動表現(xiàn)為一體化,以高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)區(qū)、跨國公司和知識產(chǎn)權(quán)資本化為主要載體。同時,梳理了在各個時代技術(shù)異化的不同表現(xiàn)形式：在蒸汽時代,技術(shù)異化開始顯現(xiàn)；在電氣時代,技術(shù)成為社會運(yùn)行的基本準(zhǔn)則,出現(xiàn)單向度的社會和單向度的人；在信息時代,風(fēng)險社會的全面到來和跨國公司在技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)移中形成的馬太效應(yīng)。 再次,論文對技術(shù)與資本互動進(jìn)行了邏輯分析。技術(shù)與資本互動何以可能,二者存在著邏輯關(guān)系上的契合,表現(xiàn)在本質(zhì)關(guān)系、共時性和歷時態(tài)三個方面。本質(zhì)關(guān)系上的共契表現(xiàn)技術(shù)本質(zhì)與資本增殖的契合,控制意志的一致性以及技術(shù)權(quán)力是資本權(quán)力的統(tǒng)治力量和模式；二者在共時性方面的交融表現(xiàn)在：技術(shù)按照資本的本性從功效性向盈利性轉(zhuǎn)變,資本的技術(shù)構(gòu)成決定資本的價值構(gòu)成。二者在歷時態(tài)方面的契合表現(xiàn)在：技術(shù)形態(tài)決定著資本形態(tài)的發(fā)展,資本的有機(jī)構(gòu)成隨著技術(shù)革命的發(fā)展或提高或降低。 技術(shù)與資本互動呈現(xiàn)出“強(qiáng)關(guān)聯(lián)性”和“共生性”的特點(diǎn)�！皬�(qiáng)關(guān)聯(lián)性”是指技術(shù)與資本相互塑造,彼此改變各自的基因和形態(tài)。資本使科學(xué)技術(shù)意識形態(tài)化,技術(shù)使資本具有生產(chǎn)力的功能,也促使剩余價值占有主體變遷；“共生性”表現(xiàn)為技術(shù)與資本一體化,即技術(shù)資本化和資本技術(shù)化。二者的對立表現(xiàn)為有限性與無限性的悖論即資本增殖的無限性和技術(shù)有限性的對立,科學(xué)技術(shù)最終消滅資本。 最后,本文提出了技術(shù)與資本互動的現(xiàn)實(shí)困境和未來走向。技術(shù)的資本使用帶來了一系列的技術(shù)倫理問題：機(jī)器對技術(shù)使用主體的奴役；人與自然關(guān)系的對立和人類精神生活的現(xiàn)代性。中國社會仍然處于技術(shù)與資本互動的社會。因此,一是要把技術(shù)批判和資本邏輯批判統(tǒng)一起來,建立技術(shù)批判的資本維度。要建立“以人為本”的資本倫理價值觀,從資本倫理的視角對科技倫理進(jìn)行創(chuàng)新和發(fā)展；二是建立創(chuàng)新型國家來克服技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)移中的馬太效應(yīng)。
[Abstract]:In the present time, technology and capital are both the driving force of the development of the modern society and the origin of the modernity. The technical philosophy circle has long focused on the criticism of the technology tool reason, and the criticism of the capital logic. The mere criticism of science and technology can get the necessary ideological power from it, but the lack of material power is the material power. Only by studying science and technology from the angle of capital logic can the real material force be obtained, that is, the critical combination of the critical weapon and the weapon. Therefore, the study of the history and logic of technology and capital interaction is the interest of the theoretical research of the technology philosophy, and on the other hand, it is the positive response of the technology philosophy to the modernity. First, the paper makes a total and diachronic state of the form of technology and capital. The paper summarizes the social demand and the social and economic relation, which is the core of the property right system, and promotes the technology. In the property right system, the key elements are the ownership, and the ownership of the capital is owned by the ownership The combination of the scientific and technological revolution and the institutional innovation of the capital formation has driven the capital form Secondly, the thesis takes three scientific and technological revolutions as the main line, and investigates the interaction between technology and capital in different historical stages The interaction between the two is the integration of the industrial laboratory and the modern enterprise system in the information age. Capitalization of technology industry, transnational corporations and intellectual property It is the main carrier. At the same time, the different forms of the technology dissimilation in the various times are combing: in the time of steam, the technology dissimilation is beginning to appear; in the electric time, the technology becomes the basic principle of the social operation, and the one-way social and one-way degree is present; In the information age, the overall arrival of the risk society and the formation of the transnational corporations in the technology transfer The horse's effect. Again, the paper has a mutual understanding of technology and capital. The logic analysis is carried out. The possibility of the interaction between the technology and the capital is the combination of the logical relation, the nature relation and the common-time nature. In essence, the agreement between the essence and the proliferation of the capital, the consistency of the control will and the power of the technology are the power and mode of the power of the capital. The transformation of the effect to the profit and the technology of the capital The combination of the two in the diachronic state is: the technology form determines the development of the capital form, the organic composition of the capital follows the technological revolution Development or improvement or reduction. The interaction between technology and capital presents a 鈥渟trong correlation鈥，

本文編號：2316957