知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪中的“數(shù)額”研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-07 15:38
【摘要】：數(shù)額作為知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪的客觀構(gòu)成要件，是認定犯罪的核心要素。隨著知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪的日益嚴重，我國加強了對侵犯知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪行為的打擊。如何對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪行為進行準確的定罪量刑，無疑是打擊該類犯罪的關鍵。在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪中，“數(shù)額”不僅貫穿于其認定的始終，而且是犯罪社會危害性的直接體現(xiàn)，也是區(qū)分罪與非罪的核心標志以及區(qū)分罪責輕重的主要根據(jù)。據(jù)此，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪的“數(shù)額”進行深入系統(tǒng)研究，具有重要的理論和實踐意義。全文分為如下四個部分： 第一部分“知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪之基本問題”，主要是梳理知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪的概念、特點和立法等基本問題，以為后文研究提供邏輯起點。其中，認為知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪，作為一個集合概念，是指行為人違反了管理知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的相關法律法規(guī)的規(guī)定，侵犯刑法所保護的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)，破壞知識產(chǎn)權(quán)管理秩序，并且情節(jié)惡劣的行為。它具有數(shù)量多、地域分布廣、多為共同犯罪、主體復雜等特點。對于如此犯罪，在立法上，我國97刑法對其進行了集中式的專節(jié)立法，相關的司法解釋使刑法分則的規(guī)定具體化。 第二部分“知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪‘數(shù)額’之概述”，該部分主要對數(shù)額的概念、形式和意義進行分析。本文認為犯罪數(shù)額是一個數(shù)量的概念，指的是侵犯知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的行為所針對的目標的損失數(shù)目或其侵犯行為所引起的危害的數(shù)目，包括直接或間接的由侵犯行為所引起的損失或危害，具體形式包括銷售金額、非法經(jīng)營數(shù)額、違法所得數(shù)額、損失數(shù)額等。分析過程中強調(diào)，數(shù)額不僅是區(qū)分罪與非罪的核心標志，而且是區(qū)分罪責輕重的主要根據(jù)。 第三部分“知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪‘數(shù)額’認定之爭議”，主要闡述知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪數(shù)額認定中的未遂、累犯、共犯和單位認定的各個具體爭議。其中認為純正的數(shù)額犯不存在未遂、不純正的數(shù)額犯存在未遂；數(shù)額的累計應注意次數(shù)、時間、首次的限制；共犯的數(shù)額認定，應采用總體金額說，但不絕對排除其他認定方式；共同犯罪入罪標準的選擇，應當根據(jù)主犯而定，適用主犯的標準等。 第四部分“知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪‘數(shù)額’立法之完善”,主要針對現(xiàn)行知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪的數(shù)額規(guī)定的缺陷，從宏觀的角度，提出完善立法的建議。首先，針對數(shù)額形式過于復雜化，，認為數(shù)額的稱謂應該規(guī)范化，將雜亂無章的數(shù)額概念集中規(guī)定為一種或兩種；其次，數(shù)額標準應當明確化，明確相關數(shù)額的計算方法、標準等；最后，數(shù)額立法應當統(tǒng)一化，一般情況下，二者出現(xiàn)沖突，應當以刑法規(guī)定為準，若經(jīng)過理論界和實務界的論證，刑法規(guī)定確有疏漏，則以司法解釋為補充。
[Abstract]:As an objective component of intellectual property crime, amount is the core element of crime. With the increasingly serious crime of intellectual property, our country has strengthened the attack on the crime of infringing intellectual property. How to accurately convict and sentence intellectual property crimes is undoubtedly the key to crack down on such crimes. In the crime of intellectual property rights, "amount" not only runs through its cognizance, but also directly reflects the social harmfulness of crime, and is also the core symbol of distinguishing crime from non-crime and the main basis for distinguishing the severity of crime. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to conduct a deep and systematic study on the amount of intellectual property crimes. The full text is divided into four parts as follows: the first part "basic problems of intellectual property crimes", mainly combing the concept, characteristics and legislation of intellectual property crimes, to provide a logical starting point for the later study. Among them, it is considered that the crime of intellectual property, as a collective concept, refers to the perpetrator violating the provisions of relevant laws and regulations governing intellectual property rights, violating the intellectual property rights protected by the criminal law, and undermining the order of intellectual property management. And an abominable act. It has many characteristics, such as large quantity, wide geographical distribution, common crime and complex subject. For such a crime, our country 97 criminal law has carried on the centralized special section legislation in the legislation, the related judicial explanation makes the criminal law subclause stipulation concrete. The second part is an overview of the amount of intellectual property crime, which mainly analyzes the concept, form and significance of the amount. This article considers the amount of crime to be a concept of quantity, which refers to the number of losses or the number of harm caused by the violation of intellectual property rights against the target. Including direct or indirect loss or harm caused by the violation, including the amount of sales, the amount of illegal business, the amount of illegal income, the amount of loss, etc. In the process of analysis, it is emphasized that the amount is not only the core symbol of the distinction between crime and non-crime, but also the main basis for distinguishing the seriousness of crime. The third part, "the dispute of the amount of intellectual property crime", mainly expounds the specific disputes of attempted, recidivist, accomplice and unit cognizance of the amount of intellectual property crime. It is considered that there is no attempt in the pure amount crime, and no attempt exists in the unpure amount crime, and the accumulative amount of the amount should be paid attention to the number of times, the time, the first time limit; The determination of the amount of accomplice should be based on the total amount of money, but not the absolute exclusion of other means of determination; the selection of the standard for the conviction of joint crime should be determined according to the principal offender, and the standard of the principal offender should be applied, etc. The fourth part, "the perfection of the legislation on the amount of intellectual property crime", mainly aims at the defects of the amount regulation of the current intellectual property crime, and puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the legislation from the macro point of view. Firstly, aiming at the complexity of the amount form, we think that the appellation of the amount should be standardized, and the concept of disorderly amount should be defined as one or two. Secondly, the standard of the amount should be made clear, and the calculation method and standard of the relevant amount should be clarified. Finally, the amount legislation should be unified, generally, the conflict between the two should be based on the provisions of the criminal law, if the theoretical and practical circles of argument, the provisions of the criminal law are indeed omissions, then the judicial interpretation as a supplement.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D924.11
本文編號：2316800
[Abstract]:As an objective component of intellectual property crime, amount is the core element of crime. With the increasingly serious crime of intellectual property, our country has strengthened the attack on the crime of infringing intellectual property. How to accurately convict and sentence intellectual property crimes is undoubtedly the key to crack down on such crimes. In the crime of intellectual property rights, "amount" not only runs through its cognizance, but also directly reflects the social harmfulness of crime, and is also the core symbol of distinguishing crime from non-crime and the main basis for distinguishing the severity of crime. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to conduct a deep and systematic study on the amount of intellectual property crimes. The full text is divided into four parts as follows: the first part "basic problems of intellectual property crimes", mainly combing the concept, characteristics and legislation of intellectual property crimes, to provide a logical starting point for the later study. Among them, it is considered that the crime of intellectual property, as a collective concept, refers to the perpetrator violating the provisions of relevant laws and regulations governing intellectual property rights, violating the intellectual property rights protected by the criminal law, and undermining the order of intellectual property management. And an abominable act. It has many characteristics, such as large quantity, wide geographical distribution, common crime and complex subject. For such a crime, our country 97 criminal law has carried on the centralized special section legislation in the legislation, the related judicial explanation makes the criminal law subclause stipulation concrete. The second part is an overview of the amount of intellectual property crime, which mainly analyzes the concept, form and significance of the amount. This article considers the amount of crime to be a concept of quantity, which refers to the number of losses or the number of harm caused by the violation of intellectual property rights against the target. Including direct or indirect loss or harm caused by the violation, including the amount of sales, the amount of illegal business, the amount of illegal income, the amount of loss, etc. In the process of analysis, it is emphasized that the amount is not only the core symbol of the distinction between crime and non-crime, but also the main basis for distinguishing the seriousness of crime. The third part, "the dispute of the amount of intellectual property crime", mainly expounds the specific disputes of attempted, recidivist, accomplice and unit cognizance of the amount of intellectual property crime. It is considered that there is no attempt in the pure amount crime, and no attempt exists in the unpure amount crime, and the accumulative amount of the amount should be paid attention to the number of times, the time, the first time limit; The determination of the amount of accomplice should be based on the total amount of money, but not the absolute exclusion of other means of determination; the selection of the standard for the conviction of joint crime should be determined according to the principal offender, and the standard of the principal offender should be applied, etc. The fourth part, "the perfection of the legislation on the amount of intellectual property crime", mainly aims at the defects of the amount regulation of the current intellectual property crime, and puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the legislation from the macro point of view. Firstly, aiming at the complexity of the amount form, we think that the appellation of the amount should be standardized, and the concept of disorderly amount should be defined as one or two. Secondly, the standard of the amount should be made clear, and the calculation method and standard of the relevant amount should be clarified. Finally, the amount legislation should be unified, generally, the conflict between the two should be based on the provisions of the criminal law, if the theoretical and practical circles of argument, the provisions of the criminal law are indeed omissions, then the judicial interpretation as a supplement.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D924.11
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 田宏杰;;侵犯知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪的幾個疑難問題探究[J];法商研究;2010年02期
2 王新宇,周宇;TRIPS協(xié)議對我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事保護的影響[J];江蘇公安�？茖W校學報;2002年01期
3 劉遠山;;論我國侵犯商標權(quán)犯罪的定罪和處罰及其刑法完善[J];河北法學;2006年03期
4 聶文峰;王居卓;;數(shù)額型職務犯罪共犯責任認定初探[J];河北法學;2011年04期
5 王新宇;周宇;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事執(zhí)法中的若干問題[J];華東刑事司法評論;2004年01期
6 張伶;張洋;;論侵犯知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪的數(shù)額問題[J];理論界;2006年08期
7 周威坤;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪數(shù)額問題研究[J];中共貴州省委黨校學報;2011年04期
8 謝望原,張雅;略論中國內(nèi)地的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑法保護[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2003年05期
9 胡云騰,劉科;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事司法解釋若干問題研究[J];中國法學;2004年06期
10 王志祥;;數(shù)額犯基本問題研究[J];中國刑事法雜志;2007年02期
本文編號：2316800
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2316800.html
最近更新
教材專著
