【摘要】：商標(biāo)平行進口是一個與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)有關(guān)的國際貿(mào)易問題,如何對商標(biāo)平行進口進行規(guī)制,如何界定商標(biāo)平行進口是否構(gòu)成侵權(quán),一直是國際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法學(xué)界的熱門話題。商標(biāo)平行進口問題雖然在我國剛剛出現(xiàn)不久,然隨著世界經(jīng)濟一體化的趨勢,其明顯呈現(xiàn)上升趨勢。對于這一問題,我國現(xiàn)行的法律制度中沒有做出明確的規(guī)定,世界各國也沒有一個統(tǒng)一的明確的可供遵循的規(guī)則；因此對于商標(biāo)平行進口問題的立法刻不容緩又任重道遠。 商標(biāo)平行進口是指未經(jīng)本國商標(biāo)專有權(quán)人或者商標(biāo)使用權(quán)人的許可,從其他國家以合法渠道進口相同商標(biāo)商品并在本國銷售的行為。鑒于商標(biāo)平行進口領(lǐng)域兩個基本原則的矛盾、各主體之間的利益沖突；世界各國又從自身利益出發(fā)各持己見,始終無法達成一致,而且各國隨著歷史的發(fā)展對待商標(biāo)平行進口的態(tài)度也在不斷變化,對于我國在商標(biāo)平行進口領(lǐng)域的立法和司法提出了巨大的挑戰(zhàn)。如何更好的規(guī)制平行進口問題,平衡各方利益,具有十分重要的實踐意義。 本文從介紹商標(biāo)平行進口的基本理論入手,在對商標(biāo)平行進口的理論內(nèi)涵的分析基礎(chǔ)上,通過對世界主要國家和地區(qū)相關(guān)的立法及司法實踐的考察,結(jié)合目前我們司法審判的經(jīng)驗,提出了我國應(yīng)對商標(biāo)平行進口問題的立法建議,以期對我國的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)研究以及穩(wěn)定市場經(jīng)濟秩序有所裨益。具體來說,本文共分為四章： 第一章介紹了商標(biāo)平行進口的基本理論,描述了商標(biāo)平行進口的產(chǎn)生的原因、概念、特征及表現(xiàn)形式；以期讓讀者可以了解商標(biāo)平行進口的內(nèi)涵。 第二章主要論述商標(biāo)平行進口領(lǐng)域的各種矛盾及解決辦法,即商標(biāo)權(quán)的保護與自由競爭的矛盾,進口商、進口國商標(biāo)權(quán)人和消費者之間的矛盾,地域性原則和權(quán)利用盡原則的矛盾等以及利益平衡的方法。 第三章介紹了世界主要國家和地區(qū)關(guān)于商標(biāo)平行進口的立法和司法實踐和對商標(biāo)平行進口的態(tài)度,為我國的立法及司法實踐提供借鑒。 第四章基于前面對于商標(biāo)平行進口理論的研究,結(jié)合對目前我們在商標(biāo)平行進口領(lǐng)域司法實踐的分析,提出了相關(guān)的立法建議。
[Abstract]:Trademark parallel import is an international trade problem related to intellectual property. How to regulate trademark parallel import and how to define whether trademark parallel import constitutes infringement has been a hot topic in the field of international intellectual property law. Although the problem of parallel import of trademark has just appeared in our country, however, with the trend of world economic integration, it obviously presents an upward trend. There is no clear stipulation in the current legal system of our country, and there is not a uniform and clear rule to follow in the world, so it is urgent to legislate on the issue of parallel import of trademark and have a long way to go. Parallel trademark import refers to the act of importing the same trademark goods from other countries through legal channels and selling them in their own country without the permission of the local trademark exclusive owner or trademark user. In view of the contradiction between the two basic principles in the field of trademark parallel import and the conflict of interests among the main bodies, the countries in the world hold their own views in the interests of themselves and can never reach an agreement. With the development of history, the attitude of different countries towards trademark parallel import is also changing, which poses a great challenge to our legislation and judicature in the field of trademark parallel import. How to better regulate parallel import and balance the interests of all parties is of great practical significance. This paper begins with the introduction of the basic theory of trademark parallel import, and on the basis of analyzing the theoretical connotation of trademark parallel import, through the investigation of relevant legislation and judicial practice in major countries and regions of the world. Combined with our judicial experience at present, this paper puts forward some legislative suggestions to deal with the problem of parallel import of trademarks in our country, in order to benefit the study of intellectual property and the stabilization of market economic order in our country. Specifically, this paper is divided into four chapters: the first chapter introduces the basic theory of trademark parallel import, describes the cause, concept, characteristics and manifestation of trademark parallel import; So that readers can understand the connotation of trademark parallel import. The second chapter mainly discusses all kinds of contradictions and solutions in the field of trademark parallel import, that is, the contradiction between trademark protection and free competition, the contradiction between importer, importing country trademark owner and consumer. The contradiction between the principle of regionalism and the principle of exhaustion of rights and the method of balancing interests. The third chapter introduces the legislation and judicial practice of trademark parallel import in major countries and regions in the world, and the attitude towards trademark parallel import, which provides reference for our country's legislation and judicial practice. The fourth chapter based on the previous research on trademark parallel import theory, combined with the analysis of our current judicial practice in the field of trademark parallel import, put forward the relevant legislative recommendations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.43

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 呂昊;;對商標(biāo)侵權(quán)行為的抗辯制度[J];中華商標(biāo);2006年09期

2 李皓,余翔,方放;歐洲法院版權(quán)權(quán)利耗盡及平行進口判例研究[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年02期

3 吳偉光;;美國的商票平行進口法律制度分析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年11期

4 張今;論商標(biāo)法上的權(quán)利限制[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);1999年03期

5 應(yīng)君;商標(biāo)平行進口合法性探討[J];經(jīng)濟論壇;2005年06期

6 詹愛嵐;美國版權(quán)耗盡與平行進口立法及其司法實踐解析[J];科技進步與對策;2005年03期

7 杜穎;;商標(biāo)淡化理論及其應(yīng)用[J];法學(xué)研究;2007年06期

8 孫玉蕓;陳奇?zhèn)?;商標(biāo)平行進口的法律分析[J];南昌大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2007年02期

9 劉雁冰;吳小鵬;;國際貿(mào)易中的商標(biāo)平行進口問題研究[J];商業(yè)時代;2009年01期

10 儲敏;平行進口的法律性質(zhì)分析[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2001年06期

，

本文編號：2289673