【摘要】：伴隨著中國召開APEC會(huì)議、加入WTO大家庭,我們的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展進(jìn)入了一個(gè)新紀(jì)元—由改革開放后的國內(nèi)區(qū)域市場經(jīng)濟(jì)過度到加入全球經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化的高速進(jìn)程中。在這頻繁的國際合作溝通中,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)不可避免地?fù)?dān)當(dāng)著現(xiàn)代社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)繁榮發(fā)展的關(guān)鍵地位。專利權(quán)作為對智力成果的所有權(quán),與物權(quán)一樣,具有一定的專有性及排他性,是一種獲得法律賦予的合法壟斷權(quán),是為企業(yè)謀取利益、爭取市場份額的重要手段；而正是由于專利權(quán)的特殊性質(zhì),為反壟斷法所豁免,不免使得某些權(quán)利人通過不正當(dāng)形式的專利行為破壞市場發(fā)展的平衡,抑制了同領(lǐng)域其他企業(yè)的進(jìn)步與生存。面對近幾年來多起專利權(quán)濫用案件,思考如何在最大限度保護(hù)專利權(quán)的同時(shí)運(yùn)用法律規(guī)制專利權(quán)的濫用成為了法學(xué)研究的重大課題。 我國《反壟斷法》只有第55條規(guī)定是涉及知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制的,如此簡單的規(guī)定顯然與濫用知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)造成的危害是不相符的。鑒于以上內(nèi)容,本文通過采用了法理分析、歸納比較分析以及實(shí)證分析等方法對專利權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制進(jìn)行研究。 全文分為四個(gè)部分：第一章,專利權(quán)濫用的概述,主要闡述了專利權(quán)濫用概念和表現(xiàn)形式的基礎(chǔ)理論。第二章,主要是反壟斷法規(guī)制專利權(quán)濫用的理論分析。第三章,列舉分析發(fā)達(dá)國家關(guān)于專利權(quán)濫用反壟斷法的制度,該部分主要介紹了美國、歐盟、日本三個(gè)國家反壟斷法規(guī)制專利權(quán)濫用的主要立法狀況,并對各國專利權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制做了評(píng)價(jià)。第四章,我國專利權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制的現(xiàn)狀及完善。針對我國在專利權(quán)濫用的法律規(guī)制方面存在的問題,在立足我國的具體國情的基礎(chǔ)上借鑒發(fā)達(dá)國家的經(jīng)驗(yàn)提出了自己的見解。
[Abstract]:With China holding the APEC conference and joining the WTO family, our economic development has entered a new epoch-from the transition of the domestic regional market economy after the reform and opening to the high-speed process of joining the global economic integration. In this frequent international cooperation communication, intellectual property inevitably plays a key role in the prosperity and development of modern society and economy. As the ownership of intellectual achievements, patent rights, like the real right, are exclusive and exclusive. They are a kind of legal monopoly right, which is an important means to obtain benefits for enterprises and gain market share. Because of the special nature of patent right, which is exempted by anti-monopoly law, some rights holders destroy the balance of market development through improper forms of patent behavior, and inhibit the progress and survival of other enterprises in the same field. In the face of many cases of patent abuse in recent years, it has become an important subject of legal research to think about how to protect patent right to the maximum extent and how to use law to regulate the abuse of patent right at the same time. Only Article 55 of the Anti-monopoly Law of China is regulated by the anti-monopoly law concerning the abuse of intellectual property rights. Such a simple regulation is obviously inconsistent with the harm caused by the abuse of intellectual property rights. In view of the above, this paper uses legal theory analysis, inductive comparative analysis and empirical analysis to study the regulation of patent abuse. The paper is divided into four parts: the first chapter, the overview of patent abuse, mainly expounds the concept of patent abuse and the basic theory of manifestation. The second chapter is the theoretical analysis of anti-monopoly law regulating patent abuse. The third chapter enumerates and analyzes the system of patent abuse in developed countries. This part mainly introduces the main legislation of the United States, the European Union and Japan to regulate the abuse of patent rights. At the same time, the anti-monopoly law regulation of patent right abuse in various countries is evaluated. Chapter four, the current situation and perfection of anti-monopoly law of patent abuse in China. In view of the problems existing in the legal regulation of patent abuse in our country, the author puts forward his own opinions on the basis of the concrete national conditions of our country and the experience of developed countries.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北方工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294;D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃勇;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)與反壟斷法的基本關(guān)系[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年07期

2 郭璐璐;云潔;;維公益 促創(chuàng)新 防濫用——解讀專利法第三次修改關(guān)于專利權(quán)人與公眾利益的平衡原則[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2009年11期

3 王先林;;從微軟壟斷案看知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷控制[J];法學(xué)家;2001年03期

4 王先林;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)行使行為的反壟斷法規(guī)制——《反壟斷法》第55條的理解與適用[J];法學(xué)家;2008年01期

5 黃勇;;中國反壟斷法:一部注重整體協(xié)調(diào)的法律[J];中國發(fā)展觀察;2006年06期

6 李惠奇;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的國際反壟斷問題的法律思考[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2011年12期

7 張冬;;專利權(quán)濫用爭議的法律協(xié)調(diào)——以專利法與反壟斷法的關(guān)聯(lián)為視角[J];河北法學(xué);2009年06期

8 向國雍;;我國《反壟斷法》的不足之處[J];決策與信息(財(cái)經(jīng)觀察);2008年06期

9 尹新天;TRIPS協(xié)議與制止知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的濫用[J];科技與法律;2000年02期

10 喬生,陶緒翔;我國限制知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的法律思考[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2005年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 楊黎明;專利權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2010年

2 李卉;專利權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法律規(guī)制研究[D];西北大學(xué);2011年

3 侯丹丹;論反壟斷法對專利權(quán)濫用的規(guī)制[D];中南大學(xué);2011年

4 王萍;論專利權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2280467