專利功能性限定特征權(quán)利要求解釋沖突問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-13 13:46
【摘要】：專利權(quán)是近代法律創(chuàng)新的重要成果之一，專利制度的建立創(chuàng)設(shè)了一種全新的財產(chǎn)權(quán)利，專利制度的正常運行可以起到“為天下之火添加利益之油”的作用。但是，近代幾乎所有學(xué)者都認為，權(quán)利要求保護范圍才是專利制度的精髓。1從專利申請、專利審查到專利保護，都是圍繞專利權(quán)利要求而進行的。2 我國專利法規(guī)定，一項發(fā)明或?qū)嵱眯滦偷募夹g(shù)方案才是權(quán)利要求書的基礎(chǔ)。3特殊情況下，專利發(fā)明過程中的目的，實施的效果，也會被用來解釋權(quán)利要求書，功能性限定特征就是這樣應(yīng)運而生的。那么，究竟何為功能性限定特征？一般來說，，是指在一項權(quán)利要求中用來限定發(fā)明的是零部件在發(fā)明中所產(chǎn)生的目的，或者步驟在發(fā)明中的效果，而不是特殊的結(jié)構(gòu)或者步驟。 我國國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)局依據(jù)《審查指南》對功能性限定特征做出了自己的解釋，而最高人民法院則依據(jù)相關(guān)司法解釋給出了自己的理解，兩種不同的解釋方式給社會帶來了極大的困擾，公眾和專利權(quán)人的利益得不到有效保護，《專利法》的嚴肅性受到嚴重挑戰(zhàn)。4因此，對于專利功能性限定特征權(quán)利要求解釋沖突問題進行研究，無論在理論上，還是司法實踐上，都具有重大的意義。 本文一共分為四個部分： 第一章對我國專利功能性限定特征權(quán)利要求解釋出現(xiàn)的問題進行了分析和闡述，針對功能性限定特征的定義、存在的原因以及對相關(guān)方面的不利影響做出了全面描述。 第二章詳細闡述了了美國、歐盟、日本、國際條約對于功能性限定特征權(quán)利要求解釋在理論和實踐中的顯著差異。 第三章采用比較法的分析方法，重點分析了美國、歐盟、日本、國際條約對于功能性限定特征權(quán)利要求解釋適用規(guī)則的不足。 第四章，通過前三章的論述，同時借鑒美國、歐盟、日本、國際條約在此問題上的觀點，提出了解決我國專利功能性限定權(quán)利要求解釋沖突問題的建議。
[Abstract]:Patent right is one of the important achievements of modern law innovation. The establishment of patent system has created a new property right, and the normal operation of patent system can play the role of "adding benefit oil for the fire of the world". However, almost all modern scholars believe that the scope of protection of claims is the essence of the patent system. 1 from patent application, patent examination to patent protection, it is carried out around patent claims. A technical scheme of an invention or utility model is the basis of a claim of rights. 3 in special cases, the purpose and effect of the patent invention process will also be used to explain the claim, This is how functional defining features emerge as the times require. So, what exactly is a functional qualification feature? Generally speaking, what is used in a claim to define the purpose of the invention is the purpose of the parts in the invention, or the effect of the steps in the invention, rather than the special structure or step. The State intellectual property Office of China has made its own interpretation of the functional limitation characteristics according to the "Review Guide", while the Supreme people's Court has given its own understanding according to the relevant judicial interpretations. Two different ways of interpretation have brought great trouble to society, the interests of the public and patentees are not effectively protected, and the seriousness of the Patent Law is seriously challenged. It is of great significance both in theory and in judicial practice to study the conflict of interpretation of patent functional defined features. This paper is divided into four parts: the first chapter analyzes and expounds the problems in the interpretation of functional qualification feature claims in China, aiming at the definition of functional defined features. The reasons for the existence and the adverse effects of the related aspects are described in a comprehensive way. The second chapter elaborates the significant differences between the theory and practice of the interpretation of the functional defined feature claims in the United States, the European Union, Japan and international treaties. In the third chapter, the comparative method is used to analyze the deficiency of the applicable rules for the claims of functional defined characteristics in the United States, the European Union, Japan and international treaties. The fourth chapter, through the discussion of the first three chapters, at the same time draw lessons from the views of the United States, the European Union, Japan and international treaties on this issue, and put forward some suggestions to solve the conflict of patent functional limitation claims in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.42
本文編號：2268863
[Abstract]:Patent right is one of the important achievements of modern law innovation. The establishment of patent system has created a new property right, and the normal operation of patent system can play the role of "adding benefit oil for the fire of the world". However, almost all modern scholars believe that the scope of protection of claims is the essence of the patent system. 1 from patent application, patent examination to patent protection, it is carried out around patent claims. A technical scheme of an invention or utility model is the basis of a claim of rights. 3 in special cases, the purpose and effect of the patent invention process will also be used to explain the claim, This is how functional defining features emerge as the times require. So, what exactly is a functional qualification feature? Generally speaking, what is used in a claim to define the purpose of the invention is the purpose of the parts in the invention, or the effect of the steps in the invention, rather than the special structure or step. The State intellectual property Office of China has made its own interpretation of the functional limitation characteristics according to the "Review Guide", while the Supreme people's Court has given its own understanding according to the relevant judicial interpretations. Two different ways of interpretation have brought great trouble to society, the interests of the public and patentees are not effectively protected, and the seriousness of the Patent Law is seriously challenged. It is of great significance both in theory and in judicial practice to study the conflict of interpretation of patent functional defined features. This paper is divided into four parts: the first chapter analyzes and expounds the problems in the interpretation of functional qualification feature claims in China, aiming at the definition of functional defined features. The reasons for the existence and the adverse effects of the related aspects are described in a comprehensive way. The second chapter elaborates the significant differences between the theory and practice of the interpretation of the functional defined feature claims in the United States, the European Union, Japan and international treaties. In the third chapter, the comparative method is used to analyze the deficiency of the applicable rules for the claims of functional defined characteristics in the United States, the European Union, Japan and international treaties. The fourth chapter, through the discussion of the first three chapters, at the same time draw lessons from the views of the United States, the European Union, Japan and international treaties on this issue, and put forward some suggestions to solve the conflict of patent functional limitation claims in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.42
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條
1 張曉都;;專利權(quán)利要求中功能性特征的解釋——以一實用新型專利侵權(quán)糾紛案為例[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年09期
2 馬曉亞;;功能性限定特征的解釋之爭[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2007年10期
3 孫平;;關(guān)于權(quán)利要求中功能性限定特征解釋的探討[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2010年05期
4 張鵬;;論功能性限定權(quán)利要求保護范圍的解釋——以我國產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀為視角[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2010年07期
5 孫平;楊斐;;功能性限定權(quán)利要求重復(fù)授權(quán)問題的探討[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2013年04期
6 樊培偉;李文靜;王云濤;;淺析專利授權(quán)和侵權(quán)訴訟中對權(quán)利要求中“功能性特征”的解釋[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2012年11期
7 陳文煊;;對專利權(quán)利要求中功能性特征的解釋規(guī)則[J];人民司法;2012年20期
本文編號：2268863
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2268863.html
最近更新
教材專著
