虛擬財產(chǎn)權(quán)利屬性研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-10-11 15:50
【摘要】:近年來,網(wǎng)絡(luò)游戲產(chǎn)業(yè)已然占據(jù)著網(wǎng)絡(luò)產(chǎn)業(yè)的主導地位。隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代的來臨,人們除了可以在現(xiàn)實世界中擁有財產(chǎn)外,在虛擬的網(wǎng)絡(luò)世界中也逐漸擁有了“財產(chǎn)”,如網(wǎng)絡(luò)游戲中的虛擬裝備,虛擬貨幣等。游戲玩家之間虛擬財產(chǎn)的交易便隨之而生,由此引發(fā)的糾紛也日益增多,如何正確認定上述交易行為的法律性質(zhì)己成為當前理論研究的熱點。但目前我國法律在虛擬財產(chǎn)領(lǐng)域的相關(guān)規(guī)定卻是一片空白,對網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財產(chǎn)的界定也是模糊不清,因而導致在處理網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財產(chǎn)糾紛時的立法缺失和司法認定上的困難。因此,本文主要針對網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財產(chǎn)的法律保護問題從以下幾個部分進行具體研究: 第一部分肯定了虛擬空間的存在價值。該部分通過引用戈夫曼的“擬劇論”以及哈貝馬斯的交往行為理論論證了虛擬空間存在的價值意義,,指出既要肯定網(wǎng)絡(luò)交往行為的合理性也應(yīng)加強網(wǎng)絡(luò)交往行為的規(guī)范化。同時這也是本文的創(chuàng)新點; 第二部分認為虛擬物品屬于財產(chǎn)范疇,具有財產(chǎn)屬性。首先對虛擬財產(chǎn)的概念進行定位,再分別介紹了學界在廣義層面和狹義層面對虛擬財產(chǎn)的定義以及保護虛擬財產(chǎn)的必要性。然后具體分析了虛擬財產(chǎn)財產(chǎn)屬性的否定學說和肯定學說,引用邊沁和洛克的觀點用以證明虛擬財產(chǎn)屬于勞動成果,并從價值性、稀缺性以及可流通性等方面具體解讀了虛擬財產(chǎn)的財產(chǎn)屬性; 第三部分探討虛擬財產(chǎn)的權(quán)利屬性。作為本文的研究重點,分別對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)學說、債權(quán)學說以及物權(quán)學說進行了評價和分析。通過將虛擬財產(chǎn)與傳統(tǒng)意義上物的屬性進行比較,肯定了虛擬財產(chǎn)的物權(quán)屬性; 本文最后主要解析了虛擬財產(chǎn)的權(quán)利歸屬及立法現(xiàn)狀,并結(jié)合一些國家和地區(qū)的虛擬財產(chǎn)法律保護措施對我國相應(yīng)的立法、司法完善提出建議。 本文旨在肯定虛擬財產(chǎn)的物權(quán)屬性,并借鑒國外的先進經(jīng)驗,通過立法完善我國的虛擬財產(chǎn)保護體系。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the network game industry has occupied the leading position of the network industry. With the advent of the network era, people can own property in the real world, but also have "property" in the virtual network world, such as virtual equipment in online games, virtual currency and so on. The transaction of virtual property among gamers is followed, and the disputes arising therefrom are increasing day by day. How to correctly identify the legal nature of the above transaction behavior has become a hot topic in the current theoretical research. However, at present, the relevant provisions of Chinese law in the field of virtual property are blank, and the definition of virtual property on the network is also vague, which leads to the lack of legislation and the difficulty of judicial cognizance in dealing with disputes over virtual property on the network. Therefore, this paper mainly focuses on the legal protection of network virtual property from the following parts: the first part affirms the value of virtual space. This part proves the value meaning of virtual space by quoting Gaufman's theory of mimicry and Habermas' theory of communicative behavior, and points out that the standardization of network communication behavior should be strengthened as well as the rationality of network communication behavior. At the same time, it is the innovation of this paper. The second part holds that virtual goods belong to property category and have property. Firstly, the concept of virtual property is defined, and then the definition of virtual property and the necessity of protecting virtual property in the broad sense and narrow sense are introduced respectively. Then it analyzes the negation theory and positive theory of virtual property, and uses Bentham and Locke's viewpoint to prove that virtual property belongs to labor achievement, and from the value, The third part discusses the property attribute of virtual property. As the focus of this paper, the intellectual property theory, creditor's right theory and real right theory are evaluated and analyzed. By comparing the property of virtual property with that of traditional property, this paper affirms the property attribute of virtual property. Finally, this paper mainly analyzes the ownership of virtual property and the current situation of legislation. Combining with the legal protection measures of virtual property in some countries and regions, the author puts forward some suggestions on the legislation and judicial perfection of our country. The purpose of this paper is to affirm the property right attribute of virtual property, and to perfect the virtual property protection system of our country by legislation for reference from the advanced experience of foreign countries.
【學位授予單位】:西南政法大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:D923
本文編號:2264579
[Abstract]:In recent years, the network game industry has occupied the leading position of the network industry. With the advent of the network era, people can own property in the real world, but also have "property" in the virtual network world, such as virtual equipment in online games, virtual currency and so on. The transaction of virtual property among gamers is followed, and the disputes arising therefrom are increasing day by day. How to correctly identify the legal nature of the above transaction behavior has become a hot topic in the current theoretical research. However, at present, the relevant provisions of Chinese law in the field of virtual property are blank, and the definition of virtual property on the network is also vague, which leads to the lack of legislation and the difficulty of judicial cognizance in dealing with disputes over virtual property on the network. Therefore, this paper mainly focuses on the legal protection of network virtual property from the following parts: the first part affirms the value of virtual space. This part proves the value meaning of virtual space by quoting Gaufman's theory of mimicry and Habermas' theory of communicative behavior, and points out that the standardization of network communication behavior should be strengthened as well as the rationality of network communication behavior. At the same time, it is the innovation of this paper. The second part holds that virtual goods belong to property category and have property. Firstly, the concept of virtual property is defined, and then the definition of virtual property and the necessity of protecting virtual property in the broad sense and narrow sense are introduced respectively. Then it analyzes the negation theory and positive theory of virtual property, and uses Bentham and Locke's viewpoint to prove that virtual property belongs to labor achievement, and from the value, The third part discusses the property attribute of virtual property. As the focus of this paper, the intellectual property theory, creditor's right theory and real right theory are evaluated and analyzed. By comparing the property of virtual property with that of traditional property, this paper affirms the property attribute of virtual property. Finally, this paper mainly analyzes the ownership of virtual property and the current situation of legislation. Combining with the legal protection measures of virtual property in some countries and regions, the author puts forward some suggestions on the legislation and judicial perfection of our country. The purpose of this paper is to affirm the property right attribute of virtual property, and to perfect the virtual property protection system of our country by legislation for reference from the advanced experience of foreign countries.
【學位授予單位】:西南政法大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:D923
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條
1 康建輝;馮冰;;論虛擬財產(chǎn)的性質(zhì)及其法律保護[J];法制與社會;2007年09期
2 侯國云;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財產(chǎn)刑事保護的不當性——讓虛擬財產(chǎn)永遠待在虛擬世界[J];中國人民公安大學學報(社會科學版);2008年03期
3 趙香如;郭曉屹;;詐騙網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財產(chǎn)犯罪化之研究[J];武漢理工大學學報(社會科學版);2008年04期
4 林旭霞;;虛擬財產(chǎn)權(quán)性質(zhì)論[J];中國法學;2009年01期
5 楊立新,王中合;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)虛擬財產(chǎn)的物權(quán)屬性及其基本規(guī)則[J];國家檢察官學院學報;2004年06期
本文編號:2264579
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2264579.html
最近更新
教材專著