【摘要】：在知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)和全球化背景下，世界范圍內(nèi)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛越來越多，且由于科技分工更加細(xì)化引起了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)專業(yè)化程度加深，進(jìn)一步加大了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛的解決難度。因此，，知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟專門化成為發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家的共同選擇，以滿足日益增長(zhǎng)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛的專業(yè)化要求。 不久前，瑞士為提高本國(guó)專利訴訟的專業(yè)化水平以增強(qiáng)其在歐洲專利訴訟系統(tǒng)中的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力，進(jìn)行了大規(guī)模的專利訴訟制度改革。而我國(guó)在面臨國(guó)際新形勢(shì)下，要滿足知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的需求時(shí)，知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟專門化亦成為知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟制度改革的首選之舉。這里的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟專門化，有“三審合一”制度和構(gòu)建知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)專門法院兩種路徑。鑒于我國(guó)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟制度建設(shè)歷史較短，相對(duì)于歐美國(guó)家來說經(jīng)驗(yàn)不足，目前尚未形成成型的理論體系，因此在全球化背景下，借鑒國(guó)外先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)也不失為一種加快建設(shè)我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟制度的行之有效的措施。 首先，本文通過對(duì)瑞士專利訴訟改革所涉及到的各方面的程序制度的分析，包括審判主體的組織結(jié)構(gòu)分析、訴訟程序的結(jié)構(gòu)分析等，詳細(xì)探析瑞士專利訴訟改革的法律實(shí)踐運(yùn)作，以便借鑒其理論與實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)。 然后，本文通過分析我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的“三審合一”改革模式的現(xiàn)狀，結(jié)合我國(guó)的國(guó)情和面臨的國(guó)際環(huán)境，分析我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟改革中的不足，以借鑒瑞士的專利訴訟制度改革，探索具有中國(guó)特色的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟制度。 最后，針對(duì)中國(guó)的現(xiàn)實(shí)情況，以及結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)者對(duì)我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟專門化研究所取得的成果，從完善審判組織、建立技術(shù)專家陪審員制度兩個(gè)方面提出了改革建議，本文期望探索一種符合中國(guó)國(guó)情的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟模式，以此來提高我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟審判的質(zhì)量與效率，并快速地推進(jìn)我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Under the background of knowledge economy and globalization, there are more and more intellectual property disputes in the world, and the specialization degree of intellectual property rights is deepened because of the more detailed division of science and technology, which further increases the difficulty of resolving intellectual property disputes. Therefore, the specialization of intellectual property litigation is the common choice of developed countries to meet the increasing demand of specialization of intellectual property disputes. Not long ago, Switzerland undertook a large-scale reform of its patent litigation system in order to improve its specialization in patent litigation in Europe to enhance its competitiveness in the European patent litigation system. Under the new international situation, the specialization of intellectual property litigation has become the first choice in the reform of intellectual property litigation system. There are two ways of specialization of intellectual property litigation: the system of "triple trial in one" and the construction of special court of intellectual property. In view of the short history of intellectual property litigation system construction in China, the lack of experience compared with the European and American countries, and the fact that a theoretical system has not yet been formed, so in the context of globalization, Drawing lessons from foreign advanced experience is an effective measure to speed up the construction of intellectual property litigation system in China. First of all, through the analysis of the procedural system involved in the reform of Swiss patent litigation, including the analysis of the organizational structure of the trial subject, the structure analysis of the proceedings, etc. This paper analyzes the legal practice of patent litigation reform in Switzerland in order to draw lessons from its theoretical and practical experience. Then, by analyzing the current situation of the reform mode of "three trials in one" in our country, combining the national conditions of our country and the international environment, this paper analyzes the shortcomings in the reform of intellectual property litigation in our country, in order to learn from the reform of patent litigation system in Switzerland. Explore the intellectual property litigation system with Chinese characteristics. Finally, in view of the reality of China and the achievements made by domestic scholars in the specialized research of intellectual property litigation in China, the author puts forward some suggestions for reform from two aspects: perfecting the trial organization and establishing the system of technical expert jurors. This paper hopes to explore a mode of intellectual property litigation in accordance with China's national conditions, so as to improve the quality and efficiency of intellectual property litigation in China, and to promote the development of intellectual property strategy in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.42;D925

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 梅術(shù)文;曹新明;;日本知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法院的設(shè)置及其啟示[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年12期

2 陳惠珍;徐俊;;論我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)立體審判模式的構(gòu)建[J];法律適用;2006年04期

3 董曉敏;;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟中的臨時(shí)禁令[J];法律適用;2008年07期

4 孫海龍;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判體制改革的理論思考與路徑選擇[J];法律適用;2010年09期

5 郭壽康;李劍;;我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判組織專門化問題研究——以德國(guó)聯(lián)邦專利法院為視角[J];法學(xué)家;2008年03期

6 聶振華;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機(jī)制與體制的完善[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2011年12期

7 林廣海;;“三審合一”——知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)案件司法保護(hù)新機(jī)制述評(píng)[J];河北法學(xué);2007年02期

8 孫海龍;姚建軍;;司法鑒定與專家輔助人制度研究——以知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判為視角[J];人民司法;2008年03期

9 易健雄;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟中的專家證人制度[J];人民司法;2009年11期

10 曾琳;;我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)司法保護(hù)機(jī)制的現(xiàn)狀和立法構(gòu)想[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2007年35期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉華俊;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟制度研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：2254039