【摘要】：著作權(quán)間接侵權(quán)行為是行為人沒有實(shí)施受知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)專有權(quán)利控制的行為,但卻為他人實(shí)施侵害專有權(quán)利的行為提供幫助或者教唆、引誘他人實(shí)施侵害專有權(quán)利的行為。實(shí)施間接侵權(quán)行為,導(dǎo)致直接侵權(quán)行為發(fā)生并造成損害后果,應(yīng)當(dāng)承擔(dān)間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任。 確立間接侵權(quán)制度,清晰界定間接侵權(quán)行為及間接侵權(quán)責(zé)任,對(duì)視頻分享網(wǎng)站服務(wù)提供者等的網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者在提供網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)時(shí)的權(quán)利義務(wù)通過完整規(guī)范的理論體系予以界定,不僅是保障數(shù)字環(huán)境下著作權(quán)人和相關(guān)鄰接權(quán)人的基礎(chǔ)權(quán)利的必要條件,更是網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者履行相關(guān)責(zé)任的前提。間接侵權(quán)不同于直接侵權(quán)和共同侵權(quán),在內(nèi)容、因果關(guān)系、責(zé)任承擔(dān)和立法適用上與直接侵權(quán)和共同侵權(quán)均有本質(zhì)的差別。網(wǎng)絡(luò)的無縫傳播和侵權(quán)后果的不可逆性,是確立著作權(quán)間接侵權(quán)制度的環(huán)境背景；侵權(quán)責(zé)任法對(duì)侵權(quán)行為的規(guī)制范圍在社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展和司法實(shí)踐中不斷擴(kuò)大,是確立間接侵權(quán)制度的歷史背景。 對(duì)視頻分享網(wǎng)站的間接侵權(quán)行為的規(guī)制,應(yīng)當(dāng)注重版權(quán)保護(hù)與技術(shù)革新之間的平衡,避免給予網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者過重的責(zé)任。視頻分享網(wǎng)站服務(wù)提供者承擔(dān)“善良管理人”的注意義務(wù),行為人應(yīng)當(dāng)具有其所屬行業(yè)或職業(yè)、專業(yè)資格等對(duì)其行為的客觀性要求。同時(shí),結(jié)合中國(guó)特色的版權(quán)保護(hù)體制,適當(dāng)采用行政措施來緩解侵權(quán)糾紛為網(wǎng)絡(luò)視頻行業(yè)造成的困擾。在著作權(quán)責(zé)任限制方面,“避風(fēng)港規(guī)則”是抗辯事由,而非免責(zé)事由。適用“避風(fēng)港規(guī)則”進(jìn)行抗辯的前提其在明知或者應(yīng)知侵權(quán)視頻內(nèi)容后積極采取必要措施。另外,對(duì)“避風(fēng)港規(guī)則”的具體適用條件應(yīng)當(dāng)做明確具體的限制性規(guī)定。
[Abstract]:The indirect infringement of copyright is an act by which the perpetrator does not carry out the control of the exclusive right of intellectual property, but provides aid or abetting for others to infringe upon the exclusive right, and induces others to carry out the act of infringing upon the exclusive right. Indirect tort shall be liable for indirect tort, which results in direct tort and damages. Establish the system of indirect infringement, clearly define the indirect tort and indirect tort liability, and define the rights and obligations of network service providers such as video-sharing website service providers through a complete normative theoretical system. It is not only a necessary condition to protect the basic rights of copyright owners and related neighbors in the digital environment, but also a prerequisite for network service providers to fulfill their relevant responsibilities. Indirect tort is different from direct tort and joint tort. It is essentially different from direct tort and joint tort in content, causality, liability and application of legislation. The seamless dissemination of the network and irreversibility of the consequences of infringement are the environmental background of establishing the system of indirect copyright infringement, and the scope of tort regulation by tort liability law is constantly expanded in the development of social economy and judicial practice. It is the historical background of establishing indirect tort system. To regulate the indirect infringement of video-sharing website, we should pay attention to the balance between copyright protection and technological innovation, and avoid giving too much responsibility to network service providers. The service provider of video sharing website undertakes the duty of attention of "good administrator", and the actor should have the objectivity requirement of his or her own profession or occupation, professional qualification and so on. At the same time, combined with the copyright protection system with Chinese characteristics, appropriate administrative measures are adopted to alleviate the troubles caused by infringement disputes for the network video industry. In the limitation of copyright liability, the Haven Rule is a defense, not an exemption. The premise of applying the "safe haven rule" is to take necessary measures after knowing or should know about the infringing video content. In addition, the specific application conditions of the safe harbour rules should be clearly defined and restricted.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京郵電大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李欲曉;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)治理與信息社會(huì)法律的研究對(duì)象和目標(biāo)[J];北京郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期

2 胡堅(jiān);美國(guó)保護(hù)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的新動(dòng)向——評(píng)美國(guó)《司法部知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)工作組報(bào)告》[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年05期

3 芮松艷;;視頻分享網(wǎng)站的侵權(quán)責(zé)任認(rèn)定——由華夏樹人訴優(yōu)酷網(wǎng)案著手[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年04期

4 王遷;;視頻分享網(wǎng)站著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題研究[J];法商研究;2008年04期

5 吳漢東;;侵權(quán)責(zé)任法視野下的網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)責(zé)任解析[J];法商研究;2010年06期

6 王遷;;論版權(quán)“間接侵權(quán)”及其規(guī)則的法定化[J];法學(xué);2005年12期

7 胡開忠;;“避風(fēng)港規(guī)則”在視頻分享網(wǎng)站版權(quán)侵權(quán)認(rèn)定中的適用[J];法學(xué);2009年12期

8 牛強(qiáng);;變動(dòng)的注意義務(wù):視頻分享網(wǎng)站過失評(píng)判的新范式[J];法治研究;2010年01期

9 謝惠加;;試論著作權(quán)間接侵權(quán)規(guī)則的法定化——兼論著作權(quán)間接侵權(quán)規(guī)則的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J];河北法學(xué);2007年02期

10 楊利華,馮曉青;著作權(quán)擴(kuò)張及其法律和經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)探討[J];法學(xué)論壇;2005年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2204982