【摘要】：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)證據(jù)具有隱蔽性、易逝性和技術(shù)性等特點(diǎn)，當(dāng)事人取證有較大的難度，人民法院是否采取證據(jù)保全措施成為了當(dāng)事人能否勝訴的關(guān)鍵。在我國(guó)最新修訂的《民事訴訟法》明確了訴前證據(jù)保全這一規(guī)定，最高人民法院《關(guān)于訴訟證據(jù)的若干規(guī)定》（以下簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)《證據(jù)規(guī)定》）、《專(zhuān)利法》、《著作權(quán)法》、《商標(biāo)法》等均對(duì)訴前證據(jù)保全相關(guān)內(nèi)容做出相應(yīng)的規(guī)定，但不完善，無(wú)法適應(yīng)當(dāng)下知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的迅猛發(fā)展，對(duì)相應(yīng)的權(quán)利保護(hù)不到位。筆者通過(guò)一個(gè)具體案例引出訴前證據(jù)保全對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟的重要性，從而說(shuō)明研究目的和意義，簡(jiǎn)述國(guó)內(nèi)外目前對(duì)訴前證據(jù)保全制度的研究。首先對(duì)訴前證據(jù)保全的界定和介紹其功能，其次對(duì)域外訴前證據(jù)保全的分析，接著分析我國(guó)目前對(duì)訴前證據(jù)保全的法律規(guī)定，再?gòu)倪@一程序中的幾個(gè)方面內(nèi)容進(jìn)行具體分析，然后從知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域上去分析我國(guó)目前在申請(qǐng)人的范圍過(guò)窄、申請(qǐng)的條件和審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不細(xì)化、實(shí)施保全的主體和時(shí)限的問(wèn)題的欠缺、擔(dān)保的規(guī)定和數(shù)額未明確和保全的方法不完善幾方面的問(wèn)題，，最后就以上的問(wèn)題提出完善的建議。
[Abstract]:The evidence of intellectual property rights has the characteristics of concealment, perishable and technicality, and it is difficult for the parties to obtain evidence. Whether the people's court adopts evidence preservation measures has become the key to whether the party can win the lawsuit. In the newly revised Civil procedure Law of China, the provisions on preservation of evidence before litigation are clearly defined. The provisions of the Supreme people's Court on evidence in Litigation (hereinafter referred to as "evidence provisions"), the Patent Law, the copyright Law, and the Trademark Law all make corresponding provisions on the preservation of evidence before litigation, but they are not perfect. Unable to adapt to the current rapid development of intellectual property rights, the protection of the corresponding rights is not in place. The author introduces the importance of the preservation of pre-lawsuit evidence to intellectual property litigation through a specific case, and explains the purpose and significance of the research, and briefly describes the current research on the system of preservation of pre-lawsuit evidence at home and abroad. First of all, the definition and function of pre-lawsuit evidence preservation is defined and introduced. Secondly, the analysis of extra-territorial pre-litigation evidence preservation is carried out. Then, the current legal provisions of pre-lawsuit evidence preservation in China are analyzed, and then several aspects of this procedure are analyzed concretely. Then, from the aspect of intellectual property rights, we analyze that the scope of the applicants in our country is too narrow, the conditions of the application and the criteria for examination are not refined, the main body and the time limit for the implementation of preservation are lacking. The stipulation and amount of guarantee are not clear and the method of preservation is not perfect. Finally, some suggestions are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 杜健;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟中電子證據(jù)若干問(wèn)題研究[J];安徽廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

2 張金蘭,許繼學(xué);論訴前訴訟證據(jù)保全的違法性[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年03期

3 張湘蘭,郭漪武;訴前海事證據(jù)保全制度淺析[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2005年01期

4 寧杰;論我國(guó)訴前證據(jù)保全制度[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年05期

5 羅劍青;祝建軍;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)民事案件證據(jù)保全存在的問(wèn)題及對(duì)策[J];科技與法律;2007年06期

6 李平;民事訴前證據(jù)保全制度的建立[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2005年04期

7 王旺林,王勁松;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟中的證據(jù)保全[J];人民司法;2002年02期

8 肖海棠;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)民事訴訟證據(jù)保全的適用[J];人民司法;2007年19期

9 楊建成;黃雪梅;劉婕;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)民事訴訟證據(jù)保全制度理論探析[J];人民司法;2007年21期

10 孔令章;;論法院訴前證據(jù)保全制度——借鑒德國(guó)獨(dú)立證據(jù)調(diào)查程序的思考[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2011年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 戴莉;淺析知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟前證據(jù)保全制度[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

2 尚繼剛;我國(guó)民事訴前證據(jù)保全制度研究[D];四川大學(xué);2007年

3 楊眉;證據(jù)保全制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：2158537