【摘要】：作為知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護最后一道防線的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的刑事保護制度，是否完善對一國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)未來發(fā)展的態(tài)勢產(chǎn)生深遠影響。本文揭示了我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事立法中存在的問題，對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪和知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事保護等相關(guān)概念進行了闡述，明晰了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事保護的必要性和重要性。然后列舉了西方國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事保護制度中較有特色、可為我國所借鑒的規(guī)定，參照TRIPS和世界知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事立法趨勢，詳細剖析我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事立法中存在的問題，最后提出完善建議。 本文共分四章。第一章是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事立法概述，共分四節(jié)。第一節(jié)，通過對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪的概念和構(gòu)成特征進行研究，，為之后的分析奠定定義基礎(chǔ)。第二節(jié)，根據(jù)上節(jié)的分析對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事保護的概念和必要性進行了闡釋。第三節(jié)，我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的刑事立法現(xiàn)狀進行了介紹。第四節(jié)介紹了TRIPS第61條及對我國知識知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事立法的影響，為第三章進一步分析我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事立法的問題打下了基礎(chǔ)。 第二章分別介紹了美、英、德等發(fā)達國家的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑法保護體系。根據(jù)各國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑法保護的特點，從著作權(quán)、商標權(quán)、專利權(quán)、商業(yè)秘密等較具特色且具有借鑒意義的方面進行了介紹。 第三章剖析了我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事立法中存在的缺陷。第一節(jié)是從罪名的設(shè)立角度闡釋了我國刑事立法中所缺乏的應設(shè)而未設(shè)的罪名。第二節(jié)從罪狀的表述上對我國相關(guān)的立法進行了質(zhì)疑。第三節(jié)則從犯罪數(shù)額對犯罪既未遂的影響角度進行陳述。第四節(jié)，指出了我國現(xiàn)行的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事立法的刑罰設(shè)定上存在的個別問題。 第四章是關(guān)于完善我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事保護的建議。本章共分四節(jié)，大體上與第三章的缺陷剖析部分相對應。本章在提出理論上的建議的同時重視實際操作性具備一定的指導實踐的意義。
[Abstract]:Whether the criminal protection system of intellectual property, as the last line of defense of intellectual property, has a profound influence on the future development of intellectual property in a country. This paper reveals the problems existing in the criminal legislation of intellectual property in China, expounds the related concepts such as crime of intellectual property and criminal protection of intellectual property, and clarifies the necessity and importance of criminal protection of intellectual property. Then it enumerates the characteristics of criminal protection system of intellectual property in western countries, which can be used for reference by our country. Referring to TRIPS and the trend of criminal legislation of intellectual property in the world, this paper analyzes in detail the problems existing in the criminal legislation of intellectual property in our country. Finally, some suggestions are put forward. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is an overview of criminal legislation on intellectual property rights, which is divided into four sections. The first section, through the research of the concept and the constitution characteristic of the intellectual property right crime, establishes the definition foundation for the later analysis. The second section explains the concept and necessity of criminal protection of intellectual property. The third section, our country intellectual property right criminal legislation present situation has carried on the introduction. The fourth section introduces Article 61 of TRIPS and its influence on criminal legislation of intellectual property in China, which lays a foundation for further analysis of criminal legislation of intellectual property in Chapter three. The second chapter introduces the intellectual property criminal law protection system of the United States, Britain, Germany and other developed countries. According to the characteristics of the criminal law protection of intellectual property in various countries, this paper introduces the aspects of copyright, trademark right, patent right, trade secret and so on. The third chapter analyzes the defects in the criminal legislation of intellectual property. The first section is to explain the lack of criminal legislation in China from the point of view of the establishment of the crime should not be established. The second section questions the relevant legislation of our country from the description of the crime. The third section states the impact of the amount of crime on the attempted crime. In the fourth section, the author points out some problems existing in the criminal legislation of intellectual property in our country. The fourth chapter is about consummates our country intellectual property right criminal protection suggestion. This chapter is divided into four sections, which correspond to the defect analysis part of Chapter 3. This chapter puts forward the theoretical suggestions while paying attention to the practical operation has a certain significance of guiding practice.
【學位授予單位】：中國社會科學院研究生院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D924.3;D923.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡堅;美國保護知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的新動向——評美國《司法部知識產(chǎn)權(quán)工作組報告》[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年05期

2 胡建國;;《TRIPs協(xié)定》執(zhí)行條款的解釋和適用——以“中美知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護與執(zhí)行案”為例[J];法商研究;2009年04期

3 張明楷;論刑法的謙抑性[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);1995年04期

4 劉科;;論《與貿(mào)易有關(guān)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)定》第61條之“商業(yè)規(guī)�！盵J];刑法論叢;2010年04期

5 余向陽;鄭小明;;論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的刑法保護[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2008年11期

6 王作富,趙永紅;“入世”后我國商標犯罪的立法完善[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2001年02期

7 陳東升;TRIPS與我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護的刑事立法完善[J];政法論叢;2003年01期

8 田宏杰;論我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的刑事法律保護[J];中國法學;2003年03期

9 唐稷堯;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪:利益背景與刑事控制[J];中國刑事法雜志;2002年03期

10 趙秉志;劉科;;國際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑法保護的發(fā)展趨勢[J];政治與法律;2008年07期

本文編號：2154243