【摘要】：本選題以知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的審判機制為著眼點,通過對國內(nèi)外研究成果和機制建設(shè)進行系統(tǒng)的探求,對我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判的三審合一的模式進行了系統(tǒng)的研究。三審合一模式下的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機制是對現(xiàn)有的三審分立的審判機制的發(fā)展,符合知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案件審判的特點,符合我國現(xiàn)階段知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案件審理的要求,有利于訴訟價值的實現(xiàn)。三審合一模式下的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機制,是指將知識產(chǎn)權(quán)相關(guān)的刑事案件、民事案件和以及行政案件,在統(tǒng)一的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)庭進行審理,不再根據(jù)法院內(nèi)部職能機構(gòu)劃分和現(xiàn)行的訴訟法規(guī)定進行審理。通過對上海、廣東和湖南的改革實踐的和德國、日本、美國、中國臺灣等國家和地區(qū)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機制進行分析,得出建立三審合一模式下的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機制既是我國司法工作的要求,也是我國實現(xiàn)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案件司法公正的必由之路。但是在我國的三審合一的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機制改革實踐中也存在著很多的問題。如相關(guān)法律法規(guī)的缺失、三審合一的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判法庭建設(shè)、“先刑后民”與“先民后刑”理念的矛盾、技術(shù)事實查明機制存在缺陷、人才隊伍建設(shè)落后等方面的問題。在三審合一的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機制的建設(shè)過程中要注重三審合一知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機制的法律依據(jù)建設(shè)、完善三審合一模式下的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判法庭建設(shè)、由傳統(tǒng)的“先刑后民”調(diào)整到“先民后刑”、加強三審合一模式下的專業(yè)技術(shù)事實查明機制建設(shè)、完善人才培養(yǎng)機制建設(shè)。
[Abstract]:This topic focuses on the trial mechanism of intellectual property rights, through the research results and mechanism construction at home and abroad for a systematic exploration, the third trial of intellectual property rights trial mode of integration of a systematic study. The trial mechanism of intellectual property under the mode of "three trials in one" is the development of the existing trial mechanism of the separation of three trials, which conforms to the characteristics of the trial of intellectual property cases and meets the requirements of the trial of intellectual property cases at the present stage in our country. It is beneficial to the realization of litigation value. The trial mechanism of intellectual property under the mode of three-trial integration refers to the trial of criminal cases, civil cases and administrative cases related to intellectual property rights in a unified intellectual property court. No longer in accordance with the internal functional division of the court and the existing procedural provisions of the trial. Through the analysis of the reform practices in Shanghai, Guangdong and Hunan and the intellectual property trial mechanisms of Germany, Japan, the United States, Taiwan and other countries and regions, It is not only the requirement of judicial work but also the only way to realize the judicial justice of intellectual property cases in China to establish the trial mechanism of intellectual property under the mode of "three trials in one". However, there are many problems in the reform of intellectual property trial mechanism. For example, the lack of relevant laws and regulations, the construction of intellectual property trial court with the combination of three trials, the contradiction between "first punishment after people" and "first people after punishment", the defects in the mechanism of finding out the technical facts, the backward construction of talent team, and so on. In the course of the construction of the intellectual property trial mechanism, we should pay attention to the construction of the legal basis of the intellectual property trial mechanism, and perfect the construction of the intellectual property trial court under the mode of triple trial. From the traditional "first punishment before the people" to "the first people after the punishment", we should strengthen the construction of the mechanism of finding out the facts of professional technology under the mode of "three trials in one", and perfect the construction of the talent training mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫海龍;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判體制改革的理論思考與路徑選擇[J];法律適用;2010年09期

2 盛學(xué)友;;“三合一”給我們帶來了什么——探訪上海知識產(chǎn)權(quán)“三審合一”新機制[J];法律與生活;2009年24期

3 胡瀟瀟;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政執(zhí)法與民事訴訟的沖突與協(xié)調(diào)——以知識產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)救濟為視角[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年03期

4 林廣海;;“三審合一”——知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案件司法保護新機制述評[J];河北法學(xué);2007年02期

5 傅利英;張曉東;;臺灣地區(qū)智慧財產(chǎn)法院制度及運作狀況述評——兼評與大陸法院試行的“三審合一”模式的區(qū)別[J];科技與法律;2009年05期

6 王燕;張軍亮;;TRIPS協(xié)議下我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)司法保護的新機制探究[J];南華大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年04期

7 ;國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略架構(gòu)下的司法保護[J];人民司法;2009年11期

8 易健雄;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟中的專家證人制度[J];人民司法;2009年11期

9 戴建志;;評江蘇基層法院的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判[J];人民司法;2010年01期

10 高遠(yuǎn);;咨詢專家助陣知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判[J];上海人大月刊;2010年01期

，

本文編號：2152277