本文選題：山寨行為 + 模仿�。� 參考：《揚(yáng)州大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：自“山寨”一詞揚(yáng)名立萬(wàn)之日起,人們對(duì)它的評(píng)價(jià)就褒貶不一,如今的“山寨”早已不是當(dāng)初小規(guī)模的各種模仿組合、投機(jī)取巧,已然發(fā)展成為一種文化。山寨手機(jī)、山寨明星、山寨節(jié)目,恰如網(wǎng)友戲言：“忽如一夜春風(fēng)來,神州無(wú)處不山寨”。山寨現(xiàn)象從一個(gè)角度折射出中國(guó)社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期的生活。改革開放以來,“山寨”現(xiàn)象從無(wú)到有、從物到人,逐漸滲透到社會(huì)的各個(gè)角落,各個(gè)領(lǐng)域,無(wú)論是速度還是規(guī)模都令人咋舌。在感嘆“山寨”現(xiàn)象蓬勃發(fā)展的同時(shí),人們也在討論：山寨的大行其道是否是中國(guó)創(chuàng)新危機(jī)的前兆?是否會(huì)對(duì)中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)造成威脅?本文試圖回答的問題是：何為山寨行為?山寨行為因何會(huì)墮入侵權(quán)的泥淖?法律上應(yīng)當(dāng)如何甄別山寨行為的合法與非法? 除去導(dǎo)論和結(jié)語(yǔ),本文分為三部分,第一部分通過典型案例指出山寨侵權(quán)的根源,簡(jiǎn)要說明“山寨現(xiàn)象”由一種經(jīng)濟(jì)行為轉(zhuǎn)化為一個(gè)社會(huì)文化現(xiàn)象的過程,展望其發(fā)展趨勢(shì)。 第二部分、第三部分則是本文的重點(diǎn)。由于“山寨”只是一個(gè)模糊的動(dòng)態(tài)的流行詞匯,沒有確切的定義。多數(shù)人認(rèn)同,“山寨”是模仿的代名詞,“山寨文化”是一種模仿文化�！吧秸幕钡暮诵拇硎巧秸a(chǎn)品,而山寨產(chǎn)品的核心是模仿。模仿行為大量出現(xiàn)在商業(yè)領(lǐng)域,判斷模仿產(chǎn)品是否侵權(quán),一是看模仿產(chǎn)品的創(chuàng)新程度,二是看該種模仿是否符合“作為科學(xué)研究和實(shí)驗(yàn)對(duì)象使用他人專利產(chǎn)品”。 戲仿作品是指為了對(duì)原作品進(jìn)行諷刺或批判,而對(duì)原作品進(jìn)行“轉(zhuǎn)換性使用”,反映出與原作品作者相對(duì)立的觀點(diǎn)、立場(chǎng)或思想感情的新作品。戲仿作品是否構(gòu)成侵權(quán),主要看新作品使用原作品的目的,新作品的性質(zhì)如何,與新作品相關(guān)的引用原作品的數(shù)量多少、品質(zhì)如何,對(duì)原作品潛在市場(chǎng)或價(jià)值的影響。
[Abstract]:Since the name "shanzhai" has become famous, people have had different opinions on it. Today, it is no longer a small-scale imitation combination, opportunistic, has developed into a culture. Shanzhai mobile phone, Shanzhai star, Shanzhai program, just as netizens joke: "all of a sudden like a night of spring wind blowing, Shenzhou everywhere Shanzhai." The shanzhai phenomenon reflects the life in the period of Chinese social transformation from one angle. Since the reform and opening up, the phenomenon of "shanzhai" from scratch, from material to human, gradually infiltrated into every corner of society, every field, no matter the speed or scale are astounding. While lamenting the vigorous development of the "shanzhai" phenomenon, people are also discussing whether the prevalence of shanzhai is a precursor to China's innovation crisis. Will it pose a threat to the protection of intellectual property rights in China? The question this paper tries to answer is: what is shanzhai behavior? Why did the act of copycat fall into the mud of infringement? How should the law identify the lawfulness and illegality of shanzhai? Apart from the introduction and the conclusion, this paper is divided into three parts. The first part points out the root of Shanzhai infringement through typical cases, briefly explains the process of "shanzhai phenomenon" transforming from an economic behavior to a social and cultural phenomenon, and looks forward to its development trend. The second part, the third part is the focal point of this article. Because "Shanzhai" is only a vague and dynamic popular word, there is no precise definition. Most people agree that Shanzhai is a synonym for imitation, and Shanzhai culture is a kind of imitation culture. The core of "Shanzhai culture" is copycat products, and the core of shanzhai products is imitation. The imitation behavior appears in the commercial field in a large number, judging whether the imitation product is infringing, one is the degree of innovation of the imitation product, the other is whether the imitation conforms to "using other people's patented products as the object of scientific research and experiment". Parody works refer to the new works which are used in order to satirize or criticize the original works and reflect the opposing views, positions or thoughts and feelings of the original works. Whether the parody works constitute infringement mainly depends on the purpose of using the original works, the nature of the new works, the quantity and quality of the cited original works related to the new works, and the influence on the potential market or value of the original works.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚(yáng)州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙林青;;滑稽模仿作品的合法性分析[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年05期

2 吳漢東;論著作權(quán)作品的“適當(dāng)引用”[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1996年03期

3 羅莉;;諧仿的著作權(quán)法邊界——從《一個(gè)饅頭引發(fā)的血案》說起[J];法學(xué);2006年03期

4 束學(xué)山;;乙方:“山寨文化”是哪門子“文化”[J];國(guó)學(xué);2009年01期

5 姚遠(yuǎn);;山寨現(xiàn)象的困境與出路[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年05期

6 王瑞武;魏茜;;淺議“山寨”產(chǎn)品的利弊[J];河北民族師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

7 方恩升;;法律視角中的山寨現(xiàn)象[J];河北法學(xué);2009年11期

8 崔澤文;;山寨文化的內(nèi)涵及其發(fā)展的理論依據(jù)[J];湖南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年08期

9 彭紀(jì)生,劉伯軍;模仿創(chuàng)新與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2003年04期

10 張建平;楊曉林;;從《漂亮女人》到《饅頭血案》:戲仿作品的合理性判斷[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)論壇(學(xué)術(shù)研究卷);2007年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2112302