本文選題：反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定 + 知識產(chǎn)權(quán)��； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：由于發(fā)達(dá)國家并不滿足于《與貿(mào)易有關(guān)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)議》（下文簡稱Trips協(xié)議）側(cè)重于實體權(quán)利上的保護，他們意欲追求更高的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，故漸漸將重心放在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法之上。加之近年來隨著知識產(chǎn)權(quán)對貿(mào)易的影響力越來越大，假冒和盜版這類犯罪行為越來越猖獗，此時旨在強有力打擊假冒和盜版的反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定（下文簡稱“ACTA”)就應(yīng)運而生了，，ACTA的最大特點是在執(zhí)法上加大力度，欲通過加強其締約國的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法力度來輻射非締約國，當(dāng)然也包括中國。ACTA在民事措施、邊境措施、刑事措施、數(shù)字環(huán)境下的專門執(zhí)法措施等方面都超過了Trips標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的執(zhí)法規(guī)則。與之相比較，我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的刑事保護還存在一些不足，立法方面主要表現(xiàn)為立法指導(dǎo)思想存在偏差、法律術(shù)語模糊不清和立法不能與時俱進，刑事司法方面主要表現(xiàn)為起訴方式存在欠缺、刑事附帶民事訴訟有待加強等。為此應(yīng)切實更新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事保護的立法理念，轉(zhuǎn)變立法模式，完善刑事法規(guī)體系，確保有效保障被害人利益的同時也要注重保護作為侵權(quán)者的被告人的基本訴訟權(quán)利。ACTA雖然反映的是發(fā)達(dá)國家的利益訴求，發(fā)展中國家從一開始就被排斥在這個協(xié)議的談判過程之外，但作為貿(mào)易大國的中國不可能置這一圍繞貿(mào)易而展開的旨在加強知識產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法的協(xié)定于不顧，必須未雨綢繆，密切關(guān)注研究此協(xié)議。而本文將落腳點放在了探究在ACTA背景下我國該如何應(yīng)對以及我國的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事保護該何去何從。
[Abstract]:Since developed countries are not satisfied with the trips Agreement (hereinafter referred to as trips Agreement), which focuses on the protection of substantive rights, they want to pursue higher standards of intellectual property enforcement, Therefore, gradually focus on intellectual property law enforcement. In addition, with the increasing influence of intellectual property rights on trade in recent years, crimes such as counterfeiting and piracy have become increasingly rampant. At this time, the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement ("ACTA"), which is aimed at effectively combating counterfeiting and piracy (hereinafter referred to as "ACTA"), has emerged as the greatest feature of ACTA, which is characterized by greater efforts in law enforcement. To radiate non-parties by strengthening the intellectual property law enforcement of their States parties, including, of course, China's .ACTA civil, border, and criminal measures, The special enforcement measures in digital environment exceed the rules of trips standard. By comparison, there are still some shortcomings in criminal protection of intellectual property in our country. The legislative aspect mainly shows that there are deviations in guiding ideology of legislation, ambiguity of legal terms and failure of legislation to keep pace with the times. In criminal justice, there are some shortcomings in the way of prosecution, and the civil suit with criminal side needs to be strengthened and so on. Therefore, it is necessary to renew the legislative concept of criminal protection of intellectual property rights, to change the legislative model and to perfect the system of criminal laws and regulations. While ensuring effective protection of the interests of victims, attention should also be paid to the protection of the basic procedural rights of the accused as infringers. ACTA, while reflecting the interests of developed countries, Developing countries have been excluded from the negotiation process of this agreement from the beginning, but China, as a trading power, cannot ignore this agreement aimed at strengthening the enforcement of intellectual property rights and must prepare ahead of time. This paper focuses on how to deal with ACTA and how to protect the criminal protection of intellectual property in our country under the background of ACTA.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923.4;D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 左玉茹;;ACTA的飛躍 基于ACTA與TRIPS協(xié)定的比較研究[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年11期

2 袁真富;鄭舒姝;徐洋;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》的主要特點及其現(xiàn)實影響[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年08期

3 程文婷;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》與我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法比較芻議[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年08期

4 楊鴻;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法規(guī)則研究[J];法商研究;2011年06期

5 劉東根;;我國侵犯知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪刑事程序之完善——以被害人權(quán)利保障為視角[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年03期

6 李宗輝;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》(ACTA)的“表”與“里”[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年08期

7 徐慧;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》對我國經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易的潛在影響分析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年08期

8 崔丹妮;;《關(guān)于辦理侵犯知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事案件適用法律若干問題的意見》述評[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年04期

9 王小龍;吳桐;;兩岸知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事保護立法比較研究[J];福建省社會主義學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年04期

10 孫萬懷;侵犯知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪刑事責(zé)任基礎(chǔ)構(gòu)造比較[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;1999年02期

本文編號：2111398