本文選題：知識產(chǎn)權(quán) + 善意取得　； 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：知識產(chǎn)權(quán)能否使用善意取得制度是近年來隨著知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法發(fā)展、傳統(tǒng)民法理論進(jìn)一步完善而產(chǎn)生的備受爭議的話題。傳統(tǒng)民法上的善意取得制度是作為重要的物權(quán)制度而存在的,它是指無權(quán)處分人將動產(chǎn)或者不動產(chǎn)以合理的價格轉(zhuǎn)讓給善意第三人,并且已經(jīng)依法進(jìn)行公示,善意第三人通常可以取得標(biāo)的物的所有權(quán),原權(quán)利人不得請求該善意第三人返還原物。可見,傳統(tǒng)民法并沒有將知識產(chǎn)權(quán)作為善意取得適用的客體,然而目前我國學(xué)界已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)了關(guān)于善意取得制度是否適用于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的爭論。出現(xiàn)這一論爭凸顯了在商品流通日益加速的當(dāng)今社會,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)作為一種無形財產(chǎn)權(quán)其價值備受關(guān)注的事實。與此同時,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓過程中所產(chǎn)生的權(quán)屬糾紛、確權(quán)規(guī)則也是學(xué)術(shù)界關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)所在。綜觀整個關(guān)于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)善意取得制度的研究現(xiàn)狀,大多數(shù)研究散見于專利、商標(biāo)或者商業(yè)秘密等某個專門的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法領(lǐng)域。對于作為概括性的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)這一類權(quán)利能否適用善意取得制度的研究較少,學(xué)者也僅是就知識產(chǎn)權(quán)善意取得制度的合理性問題進(jìn)行了分析,至于該制度如何具體定位,特別是在司法環(huán)節(jié)如何判斷某一知識產(chǎn)權(quán)能否適用善意取得制度的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問題上更是沒有廣泛、深入的探討,總之還沒有形成系統(tǒng)的研究。本文擬從知識產(chǎn)權(quán)善意取得制度的當(dāng)前現(xiàn)狀為研究起點(diǎn),展開論述知識產(chǎn)權(quán)適用善意取得制度適用的合理性,并在此基礎(chǔ)上構(gòu)建知識產(chǎn)權(quán)善意取得制度的構(gòu)成要件,以期能夠系統(tǒng)化我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)善意取得制度的相關(guān)規(guī)定并對于司法實踐在適用該制度的問題上給出些許建議。
[Abstract]:Whether intellectual property can be acquired in good faith is a controversial topic with the development of intellectual property law and the further improvement of traditional civil law theory in recent years. The system of bona fide acquisition in traditional civil law exists as an important system of real right. It refers to the unauthorized disposition of movable or immovable property to a bona fide third party at a reasonable price and has been publicized in accordance with the law. The bona fide third party can usually acquire ownership of the subject matter, and the original right holder may not request the bona fide third party to return the original thing. It can be seen that the traditional civil law does not regard intellectual property as the object of bona fide acquisition. However, there has been a debate on whether the system of bona fide acquisition is applicable to intellectual property. The emergence of this controversy highlights the fact that intellectual property, as an intangible property right, has attracted much attention in the society where commodity circulation is accelerating day by day. At the same time, the dispute of ownership in the process of intellectual property transfer and the rules of affirmative right are also the focus of academic attention. Looking at the current situation of the research on the system of bona fide acquisition of intellectual property, most of the studies are scattered in the field of intellectual property law, such as patents, trademarks or trade secrets. There are few studies on whether the intellectual property right, as a kind of general intellectual property right, can be applied to the system of bona fide acquisition, and scholars have only analyzed the rationality of the system of bona fide acquisition of intellectual property, and how to locate the system concretely. Especially in the judicial link how to judge whether a certain intellectual property right can be applied to the standard of bona fide acquisition system is not widely, in-depth discussion, in short, there has not been a systematic study. Based on the current situation of bona fide acquisition of intellectual property rights, this paper discusses the rationality of the application of bona fide acquisition system of intellectual property rights, and on this basis, constructs the constitutive elements of bona fide acquisition system of intellectual property rights. In order to systematize the relevant provisions of the system of acquisition of intellectual property rights in good faith in China and give some suggestions on the application of the system in judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馮曉青;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的權(quán)利窮竭問題研究[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年03期

2 李國強(qiáng);;無體財產(chǎn)概念對現(xiàn)代所有權(quán)觀念的影響[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2009年04期

3 蘇平;;著作權(quán)登記制度完善的思考[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年08期

4 李建華;;論知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法定原則——兼論我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的創(chuàng)新[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2006年04期

5 吳漢東;羅馬法的“無體物”理論與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的學(xué)理基礎(chǔ)[J];江西社會科學(xué);2005年07期

6 易繼明;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的觀念:類型化及法律適用[J];法學(xué)研究;2005年03期

7 吳國U，

本文編號：2103456