本文選題：產(chǎn)學(xué)研 + 協(xié)同創(chuàng)新　； 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：2010年4月,自胡錦濤在清華大學(xué)百年校慶講話發(fā)表以來,產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新引起了社會(huì)的廣泛關(guān)注,2012年12月黨的十八大提出實(shí)施協(xié)同創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動(dòng)戰(zhàn)略,協(xié)同創(chuàng)新必將成為新的創(chuàng)新方式引領(lǐng)時(shí)代潮流。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的應(yīng)用和獲得是產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新的本質(zhì),在協(xié)同創(chuàng)新的過程中知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突難以避免。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突會(huì)阻礙產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新的順利進(jìn)行,給協(xié)同創(chuàng)新過程造成麻煩和損失,甚至可能導(dǎo)致產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新走向破裂。研究產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的機(jī)理,構(gòu)建協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制,減輕知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突程度,能夠豐富產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新理論,為產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟的持續(xù)健康發(fā)展提供強(qiáng)力支撐。根據(jù)閱讀相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行梳理總結(jié),本文分析了產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突形成機(jī)理,采用了模糊評價(jià)法度量產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的程度,構(gòu)建了產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制。首先,在對產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行梳理的基礎(chǔ)上,加深了對產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新的理解,總結(jié)了產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的內(nèi)涵,了解了產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)之間的互動(dòng)關(guān)系,歸納了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突在各個(gè)階段的具體表現(xiàn)。其次,在理解產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突相關(guān)理論的基礎(chǔ)上,從四個(gè)方面分析產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的形成機(jī)理,一是協(xié)同創(chuàng)新各主體之間的利益沖突,二是協(xié)同創(chuàng)新整體目標(biāo)與各主體個(gè)體目標(biāo)之間的沖突,三是相關(guān)政策不健全,四是第三方機(jī)構(gòu)不完善。并且,運(yùn)用演化博弈建立產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突形成機(jī)理模型,深入細(xì)致地研究協(xié)同創(chuàng)新各主體之間的利益沖突,得到博弈系統(tǒng)的演化穩(wěn)定策略,分析影響博弈系統(tǒng)向演化穩(wěn)定策略演化的利益因素。再次,依據(jù)產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新接洽期、運(yùn)行期、創(chuàng)新成果分配期的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的具體表現(xiàn),確定度量產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突程度的一級指標(biāo)和二級指標(biāo),采用層次分析法計(jì)算各級指標(biāo)權(quán)重,運(yùn)用模糊綜合評價(jià)法度量產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突程度,并給出應(yīng)用實(shí)例。最后,根據(jù)產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的形成機(jī)理,構(gòu)建產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制,包括利益協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制、整體目標(biāo)與個(gè)體目標(biāo)協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制、政策協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制和第三方協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制。創(chuàng)新之處主要表現(xiàn)在三個(gè)方面。一是運(yùn)用演化博弈建立產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突模型分析利益沖突機(jī)理。二是依據(jù)產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新接洽期、運(yùn)行期、創(chuàng)新成果分配期的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的具體表現(xiàn),確定度量產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突程度的一級指標(biāo)和二級指標(biāo),運(yùn)用模糊評價(jià)法對產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突程度進(jìn)行度量。三是根據(jù)產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的形成機(jī)理,構(gòu)建產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:In April 2010, since the publication of Hu Jintao's speech on the 100th anniversary of Tsinghua University, the cooperative innovation between industry, education and research has aroused widespread concern in the society. In December 2012, the 18th National Congress of the CPC put forward the strategy of driving collaborative innovation. Collaborative innovation is bound to become a new innovation to lead the trend of the times. The application and acquisition of intellectual property is the essence of collaborative innovation of industry, university and research, and it is difficult to avoid the conflict of intellectual property in the process of collaborative innovation. The conflict of intellectual property rights will hinder the smooth progress of collaborative innovation of industry, university and research, cause trouble and loss to the process of collaborative innovation, and may even lead to the breakup of collaborative innovation of industry, education and research. Studying the mechanism of IPR conflict, constructing coordination mechanism, reducing the degree of IPR conflict, can enrich the theory of IPR collaboration innovation, and provide strong support for the sustainable and healthy development of IPR collaborative innovation alliance. According to the relevant literature, this paper analyzes the formation mechanism of IPR conflict, and measures the degree of IPR conflict by fuzzy evaluation. The coordination mechanism of IPR conflict is constructed. First of all, on the basis of combing the literature related to industrial, academic and research collaborative innovation and intellectual property conflict, it deepens the understanding of industry-study-research collaborative innovation, and summarizes the connotation of IPR conflict of industry-study-research collaborative innovation. In this paper, we understand the interactive relationship between innovation and intellectual property rights, and summarize the concrete manifestation of intellectual property rights conflict in each stage. Secondly, on the basis of understanding the relevant theories of IPR conflict, this paper analyzes the formation mechanism of IPR conflict from four aspects. The second is the conflict between the overall goal of collaborative innovation and the individual goal of each subject, the third is the imperfect related policies, and the fourth is the imperfection of the third party organization. Furthermore, by using evolutionary game to establish the mechanism model of IPR conflict, and to study the conflict of interest among the subjects of cooperative innovation, the evolutionary and stable strategy of the game system is obtained. The benefit factors influencing the evolution of game system to evolutionary stabilization strategy are analyzed. Thirdly, according to the specific manifestation of IPR conflict in the contact period, operation period, and distribution period of innovation results, we determine the primary and secondary indicators to measure the degree of IPR conflict. The index weight of all levels is calculated by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to measure the conflict degree of intellectual property rights (IPRs) in collaborative innovation between industry, university and research, and an application example is given. Finally, according to the formation mechanism of IPR conflict, this paper constructs the coordination mechanism of IPR conflict, including interest coordination mechanism, overall goal and individual goal coordination mechanism. Policy coordination mechanism and third party coordination mechanism. Innovation is mainly reflected in three aspects. The first is to analyze the mechanism of conflict of interest by using evolutionary game to establish the model of the conflict of intellectual property rights. Second, according to the specific manifestation of intellectual property conflict in the contact period, operation period, and distribution period of innovation achievement, the first and second level indexes to measure the degree of the conflict between industry, university and research cooperative innovation intellectual property rights are determined. Fuzzy evaluation method is used to measure the conflict degree of IPR. Thirdly, according to the formation mechanism of IPR conflict, we should construct the coordination mechanism of IPR conflict.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F124.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 劉鋒;;溫州市知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展指數(shù)研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;2014年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 海婷婷;產(chǎn)學(xué)研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突與協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2017年

2 吳栓荻;新常態(tài)下我國知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境措施完善問題研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2017年

3 閆曉旭;中國自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)條款研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2017年

4 于光榮;中國企業(yè)應(yīng)對美國337調(diào)查的案例和對策研究[D];湖南工業(yè)大學(xué);2017年

5 曹盼;論國際法視野下遺傳資源的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)[D];廣西大學(xué);2017年

6 蔡海瀟;我國縣域R&D政策構(gòu)想[D];東華大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號：2092983