本文選題：產(chǎn)學研 + 協(xié)同創(chuàng)新��； 參考：《鄭州大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：2010年4月,自胡錦濤在清華大學百年校慶講話發(fā)表以來,產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新引起了社會的廣泛關注,2012年12月黨的十八大提出實施協(xié)同創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動戰(zhàn)略,協(xié)同創(chuàng)新必將成為新的創(chuàng)新方式引領時代潮流。知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的應用和獲得是產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新的本質(zhì),在協(xié)同創(chuàng)新的過程中知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突難以避免。知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突會阻礙產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新的順利進行,給協(xié)同創(chuàng)新過程造成麻煩和損失,甚至可能導致產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新走向破裂。研究產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的機理,構(gòu)建協(xié)調(diào)機制,減輕知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突程度,能夠豐富產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新理論,為產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟的持續(xù)健康發(fā)展提供強力支撐。根據(jù)閱讀相關文獻進行梳理總結(jié),本文分析了產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突形成機理,采用了模糊評價法度量產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的程度,構(gòu)建了產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突協(xié)調(diào)機制。首先,在對產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突相關文獻進行梳理的基礎上,加深了對產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新的理解,總結(jié)了產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的內(nèi)涵,了解了產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)之間的互動關系,歸納了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突在各個階段的具體表現(xiàn)。其次,在理解產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突相關理論的基礎上,從四個方面分析產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的形成機理,一是協(xié)同創(chuàng)新各主體之間的利益沖突,二是協(xié)同創(chuàng)新整體目標與各主體個體目標之間的沖突,三是相關政策不健全,四是第三方機構(gòu)不完善。并且,運用演化博弈建立產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突形成機理模型,深入細致地研究協(xié)同創(chuàng)新各主體之間的利益沖突,得到博弈系統(tǒng)的演化穩(wěn)定策略,分析影響博弈系統(tǒng)向演化穩(wěn)定策略演化的利益因素。再次,依據(jù)產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新接洽期、運行期、創(chuàng)新成果分配期的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的具體表現(xiàn),確定度量產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突程度的一級指標和二級指標,采用層次分析法計算各級指標權(quán)重,運用模糊綜合評價法度量產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突程度,并給出應用實例。最后,根據(jù)產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的形成機理,構(gòu)建產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突協(xié)調(diào)機制,包括利益協(xié)調(diào)機制、整體目標與個體目標協(xié)調(diào)機制、政策協(xié)調(diào)機制和第三方協(xié)調(diào)機制。創(chuàng)新之處主要表現(xiàn)在三個方面。一是運用演化博弈建立產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突模型分析利益沖突機理。二是依據(jù)產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新接洽期、運行期、創(chuàng)新成果分配期的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的具體表現(xiàn),確定度量產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突程度的一級指標和二級指標,運用模糊評價法對產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突程度進行度量。三是根據(jù)產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突的形成機理,構(gòu)建產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突協(xié)調(diào)機制。
[Abstract]:In April 2010, since the publication of Hu Jintao's speech on the 100th anniversary of Tsinghua University, the cooperative innovation between industry, education and research has aroused widespread concern in the society. In December 2012, the 18th National Congress of the CPC put forward the strategy of driving collaborative innovation. Collaborative innovation is bound to become a new innovation to lead the trend of the times. The application and acquisition of intellectual property is the essence of collaborative innovation of industry, university and research, and it is difficult to avoid the conflict of intellectual property in the process of collaborative innovation. The conflict of intellectual property rights will hinder the smooth progress of collaborative innovation of industry, university and research, cause trouble and loss to the process of collaborative innovation, and may even lead to the breakup of collaborative innovation of industry, education and research. Studying the mechanism of IPR conflict, constructing coordination mechanism, reducing the degree of IPR conflict, can enrich the theory of IPR collaboration innovation, and provide strong support for the sustainable and healthy development of IPR collaborative innovation alliance. According to the relevant literature, this paper analyzes the formation mechanism of IPR conflict, and measures the degree of IPR conflict by fuzzy evaluation. The coordination mechanism of IPR conflict is constructed. First of all, on the basis of combing the literature related to industrial, academic and research collaborative innovation and intellectual property conflict, it deepens the understanding of industry-study-research collaborative innovation, and summarizes the connotation of IPR conflict of industry-study-research collaborative innovation. In this paper, we understand the interactive relationship between innovation and intellectual property rights, and summarize the concrete manifestation of intellectual property rights conflict in each stage. Secondly, on the basis of understanding the relevant theories of IPR conflict, this paper analyzes the formation mechanism of IPR conflict from four aspects. The second is the conflict between the overall goal of collaborative innovation and the individual goal of each subject, the third is the imperfect related policies, and the fourth is the imperfection of the third party organization. Furthermore, by using evolutionary game to establish the mechanism model of IPR conflict, and to study the conflict of interest among the subjects of cooperative innovation, the evolutionary and stable strategy of the game system is obtained. The benefit factors influencing the evolution of game system to evolutionary stabilization strategy are analyzed. Thirdly, according to the specific manifestation of IPR conflict in the contact period, operation period, and distribution period of innovation results, we determine the primary and secondary indicators to measure the degree of IPR conflict. The index weight of all levels is calculated by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to measure the conflict degree of intellectual property rights (IPRs) in collaborative innovation between industry, university and research, and an application example is given. Finally, according to the formation mechanism of IPR conflict, this paper constructs the coordination mechanism of IPR conflict, including interest coordination mechanism, overall goal and individual goal coordination mechanism. Policy coordination mechanism and third party coordination mechanism. Innovation is mainly reflected in three aspects. The first is to analyze the mechanism of conflict of interest by using evolutionary game to establish the model of the conflict of intellectual property rights. Second, according to the specific manifestation of intellectual property conflict in the contact period, operation period, and distribution period of innovation achievement, the first and second level indexes to measure the degree of the conflict between industry, university and research cooperative innovation intellectual property rights are determined. Fuzzy evaluation method is used to measure the conflict degree of IPR. Thirdly, according to the formation mechanism of IPR conflict, we should construct the coordination mechanism of IPR conflict.
【學位授予單位】：鄭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F124.3

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 劉鋒;;溫州市知識產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)展指數(shù)研究[J];經(jīng)濟論壇;2014年04期

相關碩士學位論文 前6條

1 海婷婷;產(chǎn)學研協(xié)同創(chuàng)新知識產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突與協(xié)調(diào)機制研究[D];鄭州大學;2017年

2 吳栓荻;新常態(tài)下我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)邊境措施完善問題研究[D];廣西大學;2017年

3 閆曉旭;中國自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定知識產(chǎn)權(quán)條款研究[D];鄭州大學;2017年

4 于光榮;中國企業(yè)應對美國337調(diào)查的案例和對策研究[D];湖南工業(yè)大學;2017年

5 曹盼;論國際法視野下遺傳資源的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護[D];廣西大學;2017年

6 蔡海瀟;我國縣域R&D政策構(gòu)想[D];東華大學;2017年

，

本文編號：2092983