本文選題：知識產(chǎn)權(quán) + 濫用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)　； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：當(dāng)今社會是一個知識經(jīng)濟社會，在紛繁復(fù)雜的經(jīng)濟競爭中，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的地位顯得尤為重要，由知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用而引發(fā)的壟斷行為也越來越凸顯。在我國，隨著《反壟斷法》的頒布，從對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法與反壟斷法之間復(fù)雜關(guān)系的理解，到反壟斷法對濫用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行為的規(guī)制，不僅受到知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法學(xué)界的關(guān)注，更是成為反壟斷法學(xué)界研究的重要課題。尤其是近年來隨著我國加入WTO，跨國公司紛紛進入我國，在我國利用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)進行壟斷的行為愈演愈烈。但遺憾的是，我國相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的立法過于原則、模糊，反壟斷執(zhí)法效率低下，司法實踐經(jīng)驗不足等原因?qū)е挛覈鴱钠髽I(yè)到消費者都面臨著極為不利的局面。因此，加強對濫用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的反壟斷法律規(guī)制問題的研究是一個具有重要意義的研究課題。 本文除引言外，共分為五部分： 引言以360訴QQ案和蘋果公司訴三星公司案引出，提出案情反映的議題即本文研究的問題，概述了學(xué)術(shù)界對濫用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)反壟斷法律規(guī)制的研究現(xiàn)狀，提出本文的研究內(nèi)容、研究方法及創(chuàng)新之處。 第一部分，研究知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護與濫用的相關(guān)問題。從界定知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的概念和性質(zhì)引出濫用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的概念及現(xiàn)有法律、法規(guī)對濫用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行為的規(guī)制，同時提出知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的濫用行為主要涉及專利權(quán)濫用的觀點。 第二部分，研究知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與反壟斷的相關(guān)關(guān)系。從知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法與反壟斷法的關(guān)系，濫用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與排除、限制競爭之間的關(guān)系，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與市場支配地位之間的關(guān)系這三組關(guān)系來分析。 第三部分，研究我國反壟斷法律體系在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的實施現(xiàn)狀。第一，根據(jù)《反壟斷法》基本分析框架，受我國《反壟斷法》規(guī)制的濫用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的典型行為可分為濫用市場支配地位的行為、限制競爭協(xié)議的行為和企業(yè)合并的行為。其中典型的濫用市場支配地位的行為有拒絕許可、搭售、價格歧視行為，典型的限制競爭協(xié)議的行為有交叉許可和聯(lián)營協(xié)議、價格限制的行為。除此之外，還有與技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)相關(guān)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行為是近幾年來受到理論與實務(wù)界普遍關(guān)注的行為之一。其次，從立法、執(zhí)法、司法三個方面闡述我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的反壟斷法律規(guī)制現(xiàn)狀及存在的問題。 第四部分，研究學(xué)習(xí)、借鑒國外有關(guān)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法律規(guī)制的理論與實踐經(jīng)驗，以及我國可以從中受到的若干啟示。這里主要是借鑒美國、歐盟和日本的經(jīng)驗。 第五部分，在借鑒美國、歐盟、日本的相關(guān)經(jīng)驗的同時，結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)階段特有的經(jīng)濟形勢、社會情況，從四個方面來提出關(guān)于如何完善我國反壟斷法律體系對濫用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行為進行規(guī)制的建議。該部分由四個小部分組成：第一，制定知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的反壟斷執(zhí)法指南；第二，，對法律責(zé)任進行細化、優(yōu)化規(guī)定；第三，設(shè)立專門的具有獨立性的反壟斷執(zhí)法機構(gòu)；第四，設(shè)立專門的反壟斷法庭。 結(jié)語部分對我國現(xiàn)階段濫用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的反壟斷規(guī)制進行概括總結(jié)，對以后采用多學(xué)科、多方法進行更加全面的研究提出設(shè)想。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, the society is a knowledge-based economy society. In the complicated and complicated economic competition, the status of intellectual property is particularly important. The monopolistic behavior caused by the abuse of intellectual property is becoming more and more prominent. In China, with the promulgation of the antitrust law, the understanding of the complex relationship between the intellectual property law and the antitrust law, to the antitrust law. The regulation of the abuse of intellectual property rights is not only paid attention to by the intellectual property law circle, but also an important subject in the field of antitrust law. Especially in recent years, with China's entry into WTO, transnational corporations have entered China in succession, and the behavior of using intellectual property to monopolize in our country is becoming more and more intense. The legislation is too principled, fuzzy, the efficiency of the anti-monopoly law enforcement is low, the judicial practice is insufficient, and so on, which leads to the extremely unfavorable situation in our country from the enterprise to the consumer. Therefore, it is an important research topic to strengthen the research on the legal regulation of the abuse of intellectual property rights.
In addition to the introduction, this article is divided into five parts.
The introduction, led by 360 cases of QQ and the case of Apple Corp and Samsung Corp, puts forward the issues reflected in the case, that is, the study of this article, and summarizes the research status of the academic circles on the abuse of intellectual property rights antitrust laws and regulations, and puts forward the research contents, research methods and innovations of this paper.
In the first part, the problems related to the protection and abuse of intellectual property rights are studied. From the definition and nature of intellectual property rights, the concept of abusing intellectual property and the existing laws and regulations on the abuse of intellectual property rights are introduced. At the same time, the abuse of intellectual property is mainly concerned with the view that the abuse of patent rights is mainly involved.
The second part studies the relationship between intellectual property rights and antitrust. From the relationship between intellectual property law and antitrust law, the relationship between intellectual property rights and exclusion, restriction of competition, and the relationship between intellectual property rights and market dominance, the relationship between intellectual property rights and market dominance is analyzed.
The third part is to study the present situation of the implementation of China's antitrust legal system in the field of intellectual property rights. Firstly, according to the basic analytical framework of the antitrust law, the typical behavior of abusing intellectual property rights regulated by China's antitrust law can be divided into behavior of abusing the dominant position of the market, limiting the behavior of the competition agreement and the behavior of the merger of enterprises. The behavior of abusing market dominance is denial of license, tying, price discrimination, and typical behavior restricting competition agreements with cross licensing and joint agreement and price restriction. In addition, intellectual property behavior related to technical standards is one of the common concerns of theoretical and practical circles in recent years. Secondly, from the three aspects of legislation, law enforcement and judicature, this paper expounds the current situation and existing problems of the legal regulation of anti monopoly in the field of intellectual property in China.
The fourth part, study and study, draw lessons from the theoretical and practical experiences of foreign antitrust legal regulations on the abuse of intellectual property rights, as well as some inspirations in China. This is mainly the experience of the United States, the European Union and Japan.
The fifth part, in reference to the relevant experience of the United States, the European Union and Japan, combined with the specific economic situation and social situation in our country at the present stage, from four aspects, it puts forward some suggestions on how to improve the regulation of the abuse of intellectual property rights by our antitrust legal system. This part is composed of four small parts: first, to formulate knowledge production. The anti monopoly law enforcement guide in the right field; second, to refine the legal responsibility and optimize the regulations; third, set up a special anti monopoly law enforcement agency with independence; and fourth, set up a special antitrust tribunal.
The concluding part summarizes the antitrust regulation of the abuse of intellectual property right in our country at the present stage, and puts forward a tentative plan for a more comprehensive study of multidisciplinary and multi methods in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.294;D923.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 丁道勤;;從Rambus案看標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化中專利權(quán)濫用的法律規(guī)制[J];法律適用;2012年04期

2 王先林;;實施知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略與防止知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用——《國家知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略綱要》中防止知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用解讀[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2008年09期

3 王先林;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用及其法律規(guī)制[J];法學(xué);2004年03期

4 張紫薇;孫武斌;;從微軟壟斷案看反壟斷法對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的法律規(guī)制[J];西北工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年03期

5 王先林;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行使行為的反壟斷法規(guī)制——談《反壟斷法》第五十五條的理解與適用[J];工商行政管理;2011年12期

6 靳加強;;淺談反壟斷法對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的規(guī)制[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2012年05期

7 王源擴;試論與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)有關(guān)的反競爭行為及其法律控制[J];政法論壇;1996年04期

8 葉衛(wèi)平;;反壟斷法的價值構(gòu)造[J];中國法學(xué);2012年03期

本文編號：2060815