本文選題：知識產(chǎn)權人才 + 政策環(huán)境　； 參考：《南京工業(yè)大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著全球化、市場化、信息化、知識化進程的推進，世界各國的發(fā)展日益緊密地結合在一起。在當今社會，已經(jīng)不是光靠資源的消耗發(fā)展經(jīng)濟，而是要走資源集約型的道路。這樣的發(fā)展模式中最重要的因素是人才，人才的作用目前已經(jīng)被各國所重視，每個國家的發(fā)展都必須依靠人才，一個國家人才數(shù)量的多少甚至可以看作是這個國家實力強弱的最主要指標。知識產(chǎn)權是當前各國在全球化經(jīng)濟潮流中發(fā)展本國實力，，開拓海外市場的一個重要工具。為了應對在全球化市場中遇到的知識產(chǎn)權問題，各國現(xiàn)在都在不遺余力地培養(yǎng)自己的知識產(chǎn)權人才，寄希望于這些人才可以提供知識產(chǎn)權的專業(yè)性知識，可以幫助本國政府和企業(yè)在激烈的競爭中立于不敗之地。高層次知識產(chǎn)權人才是那些具有國際視野和戰(zhàn)略思維的不可多得的知識產(chǎn)權人才，各國對于這樣的人才都是異常重視，投入大量資源來培養(yǎng)，在引進高層次知識產(chǎn)權人才的政策上都是給出了非常優(yōu)厚的條件。 知識產(chǎn)權概念進入我國時間并不長，但自從我國加入WTO，進入全球市場之后，我們對于知識產(chǎn)權的重視程度正在被非常迅猛地提高。但我國目前的知識產(chǎn)權人才是非常緊缺的，這是由于多種因素造成的，比如：教育政策滯后、師資力量薄弱、專業(yè)信息資源匱乏、缺乏與國際知識產(chǎn)權界的交流活動、人力資源管理混亂、評價標準不統(tǒng)一等等。為了彌補我國知識產(chǎn)權人才，主要是高層次知識產(chǎn)權人才緊缺的局面，需要從整體上改善我國高層次知識產(chǎn)權人才成長的政策環(huán)境。本文分為四個部分：緒論主要介紹知識產(chǎn)權、人才和知識產(chǎn)權人才的相關概念，并且闡述了對知識產(chǎn)權人才的理解；第二章主要從政治、經(jīng)濟、文化、自然環(huán)境四個方面介紹當前我國高層次知識產(chǎn)權人才成長的政策環(huán)境現(xiàn)狀；第三章主要是通過對比分析方式先綜述國外高層次知識產(chǎn)權人才成長的政策環(huán)境，再由具體的例子，即美國和日本的政策環(huán)境，簡要闡述具體有哪些特點值得我們學習；第四章指出我國高層次知識產(chǎn)權人才成長的政策環(huán)境缺陷，并且相對應地整理出我們的治理思路。
[Abstract]:With the development of globalization, marketization, information and knowledge, the development of countries in the world is more and more closely combined. In today's society, it is not only the consumption of resources to develop the economy, but to take the road of resource-intensive. The most important factor in such a development model is talent, whose role has been valued by all countries. Each country must rely on talent for its development. The number of talents in a country can even be regarded as the most important indicator of the strength of this country. Intellectual property is an important tool for countries to develop their own strength and open up overseas markets in the current trend of global economy. In order to deal with the intellectual property problems encountered in the globalized market, countries are now sparing no effort to train their own intellectual property talents, hoping that they can provide professional knowledge of intellectual property. Can help national governments and enterprises in fierce competition in an invincible position. High-level intellectual property talents are rare intellectual property talents with international vision and strategic thinking. All countries attach great importance to such talents and invest a great deal of resources to cultivate them. In the introduction of high-level intellectual property policies are given very good conditions. The concept of intellectual property has not been introduced into China for a long time, but since China joined the WTO and entered the global market, our attention to intellectual property has been increasing rapidly. However, the current intellectual property talent in China is very short, which is caused by a variety of factors, such as lagging educational policies, weak teachers, lack of professional information resources, and lack of communication activities with the international intellectual property community. Human resources management confusion, evaluation standards are not uniform and so on. In order to make up for the shortage of intellectual property talents in our country, it is necessary to improve the policy environment for the growth of high-level intellectual property talents in our country as a whole. This paper is divided into four parts: the introduction mainly introduces the related concepts of intellectual property, talent and intellectual property talent, and expounds the understanding of intellectual property talent; the second chapter mainly from the political, economic, cultural, This paper introduces the current situation of the policy environment for the growth of high-level intellectual property talents in China from four aspects of the natural environment. Chapter three mainly summarizes the policy environment for the growth of high-level intellectual property talents in foreign countries by means of comparative analysis, and then gives concrete examples. That is, the policy environment of the United States and Japan, a brief description of the specific characteristics for us to learn; the fourth chapter points out the growth of high-level intellectual property rights talents in China's policy environment defects, and the corresponding collation of our governance ideas.
【學位授予單位】：南京工業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：C964.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 陳莉莉;;成長期高新技術企業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權人才隊伍的建設[J];安徽科技;2010年08期

2 吳漢東;;知識產(chǎn)權的學科特點與人才培養(yǎng)要求[J];中華商標;2007年11期

3 陶鑫良;;加快知識產(chǎn)權人才培養(yǎng)時不我待[J];中華商標;2007年11期

4 嚴永和;;我國知識產(chǎn)權人才培養(yǎng)機制存在的問題及其解決辦法[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權;2008年12期

5 錢江;;中美大學知識產(chǎn)權教學的特色與思考[J];福建論壇(社科教育版);2010年08期

6 張建衛(wèi);陳衛(wèi)華;王文佐;;論知識經(jīng)濟時代知識產(chǎn)權人才培養(yǎng)[J];中國管理信息化(綜合版);2006年05期

7 陳紅軍;;論我國知識產(chǎn)權人才的培養(yǎng)[J];黑龍江科技信息;2007年20期

8 王文佐;張建衛(wèi);陳衛(wèi)華;;企業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權人才的知識結構探析[J];市場論壇;2006年03期

9 代碧波;;構建我國企業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權體系的對策研究[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2010年11期

10 譚綺球;鄧保國;馬希良;;知識產(chǎn)權人才專業(yè)技術評價制度研究——基本認識與框架設計[J];科技管理研究;2009年07期

本文編號：2058035