本文選題：技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化 + 反壟斷法��； 參考：《中國(guó)計(jì)量學(xué)院》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代的到來(lái)，新的市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)規(guī)則已然確立，“技術(shù)專利化，專利標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化，標(biāo)準(zhǔn)許可化”是對(duì)當(dāng)前企業(yè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的最形象描述。技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化過(guò)程中，通過(guò)技術(shù)優(yōu)化，提高了生產(chǎn)效率；通過(guò)簡(jiǎn)化產(chǎn)品種類，提高了規(guī)模經(jīng)濟(jì)效率；通過(guò)可靠的質(zhì)量預(yù)期，保護(hù)了消費(fèi)者福利。然而，技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化是一把“雙刃劍”，在技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化過(guò)程中持有者可以通過(guò)設(shè)置市場(chǎng)進(jìn)入壁壘，排斥其他競(jìng)爭(zhēng)者進(jìn)入相關(guān)市場(chǎng)，謀取并維持壟斷地位，獲取超額利潤(rùn)，因此而實(shí)施限制市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的行為。有鑒于此，，技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化中的限制競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為越來(lái)越受到反壟斷法理論界和反壟斷執(zhí)法、司法的重視。 本文擬從技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化與反壟斷法的一般理論入手，介紹技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化的概念及技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化對(duì)市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)影響的利弊，論文著重分析技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化中限制競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為的反壟斷法規(guī)制，采用比較有特色的以主體為主，主體結(jié)合行為的研究方法，從行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)、企業(yè)聯(lián)盟和企業(yè)三種不同主體的角度分析技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化行為中限制競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為特點(diǎn)及反壟斷法規(guī)制，進(jìn)而提出對(duì)完善我國(guó)反壟斷法對(duì)技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化中限制競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為的規(guī)制的建議。最后，在借鑒國(guó)外的經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上，提出了在我國(guó)制定《知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域反壟斷執(zhí)法指南》、確立以合理原則為基礎(chǔ)的分析原則、注重與技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的關(guān)系等完善立法和改進(jìn)執(zhí)法方面的建議。
[Abstract]:With the arrival of the era of knowledge economy, the new rules of market competition have been established. "Technology patent, patent standardization, standard licensing" is the most vivid description of the current enterprise standard competition. In the process of technological standardization, the production efficiency is improved through technological optimization, the efficiency of scale economy is improved by simplifying the product category, and the consumer welfare is protected by reliable quality expectation. However, technology standardization is a "double-edged sword". In the process of technology standardization, holders can set up market entry barriers, exclude other competitors from entering relevant markets, seek and maintain monopoly status, and obtain excess profits. Therefore, the implementation of restrictions on market competition behavior. In view of this, the restrictive competition behavior in the technology standardization is paid more and more attention by the antimonopoly law theorists and the antimonopoly law enforcement and the judicature. Starting with the general theory of technology standardization and antimonopoly law, this paper introduces the concepts of technology standard and technology standardization, and the advantages and disadvantages of technology standardization on market competition. This paper focuses on the analysis of the regulation of anti-monopoly law, which restricts the competition behavior in the technical standardization, and adopts the characteristic research method of subject-oriented, subject-combining behavior, from the trade association, This paper analyzes the characteristics of restrictive competition behavior and the regulation of anti-monopoly law in the behavior of technological standardization from the angles of three different subjects of enterprise alliance and enterprise, and then puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the regulation of restricting competition behavior in the process of technological standardization in China's anti-monopoly law. Finally, on the basis of drawing lessons from foreign experience, the paper puts forward the analytical principles based on the reasonable principle to establish the Guide for Anti-monopoly Law Enforcement in the Field of intellectual property in China. Focus on the relationship with technological innovation and improve legislation and improve law enforcement recommendations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)計(jì)量學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294;D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王先林;;從微軟壟斷案看知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷控制[J];法學(xué)家;2001年03期

2 王先林;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用及其法律規(guī)制[J];法學(xué);2004年03期

3 王長(zhǎng)秋;中國(guó)市場(chǎng)中聯(lián)合抵制的反壟斷法規(guī)制[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年06期

4 時(shí)建中;陳鳴;;技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化過(guò)程中的利益平衡——兼論新經(jīng)濟(jì)下知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法與反壟斷法的互動(dòng)[J];科技與法律;2008年05期

5 顏運(yùn)秋;反壟斷法立法目的與保護(hù)消費(fèi)者權(quán)益[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)家;2005年05期

6 王艷林,李彬;中國(guó)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法基本范疇的確立及其對(duì)立法的意義——兼評(píng)《中華人民共和國(guó)反壟斷法》草案的修改[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

7 楊建東;;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化與技術(shù)創(chuàng)新之我見(jiàn)[J];品牌與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化;2011年18期

8 蔡朋;王雷;;第三代移動(dòng)通信技術(shù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)建立中的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)問(wèn)題[J];網(wǎng)絡(luò)法律評(píng)論;2004年01期

9 韓靈麗;標(biāo)準(zhǔn)戰(zhàn)略的法律研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2002年06期

10 王曉曄;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)強(qiáng)制許可中的反壟斷法[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2007年04期

本文編號(hào)：2046468