本文選題：文化產(chǎn)業(yè) + 投融資機(jī)制�。� 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2013年博士論文

【摘要】：文化產(chǎn)業(yè)作為知識(shí)和資本密集型的產(chǎn)業(yè)，充裕的資金是其持續(xù)健康發(fā)展的基礎(chǔ)和保障。因此，文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資問(wèn)題是關(guān)系到文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的根本性問(wèn)題。目前來(lái)看，美國(guó)等發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家在其近百年的文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展中已經(jīng)形成了較為完善的投融資體系，從而為本國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展提供了重要的保障。我國(guó)的文化產(chǎn)業(yè)建設(shè)起步較晚，目前文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資體系正在建設(shè)之中，而文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資機(jī)制不完善、投融資方式匱乏等問(wèn)題是當(dāng)前阻礙我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)進(jìn)一步發(fā)展的主要“瓶頸”�；诖耍疚倪x取了中美文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資比較研究這一選題，對(duì)中美文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資問(wèn)題進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的分析和客觀的評(píng)價(jià)，以凝練出美國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資的基本經(jīng)驗(yàn)，并為促進(jìn)我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資的發(fā)展提供理論指導(dǎo)和經(jīng)驗(yàn)借鑒。本文的研究主要分為六個(gè)部分。 第一部分為緒論。該部分主要介紹了本論文的研究背景和選題意義，并對(duì)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資的相關(guān)理論、文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資的運(yùn)行機(jī)制、投融資方式以及投融資效率等方面的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行了梳理和評(píng)述。同時(shí)，本部分還對(duì)本論文的研究方法與結(jié)構(gòu)安排情況進(jìn)行了闡述，并指出了本論文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)和研究的不足。 第二部分主要對(duì)中美文化產(chǎn)業(yè)以及文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了闡述。其中對(duì)于中國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的研究主要側(cè)重于分析中國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀、趨勢(shì)和存在的不足等方面；而對(duì)中國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資的研究也主要分析了中國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資的現(xiàn)狀，特點(diǎn)以及存在的問(wèn)題等。在對(duì)美國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的研究中，則主要側(cè)重于分析美國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)在其經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展中的作用、文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀和發(fā)展的特點(diǎn)與經(jīng)驗(yàn)等問(wèn)題；在對(duì)美國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資的研究中，則主要是從總結(jié)歸納美國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資的特點(diǎn)和經(jīng)驗(yàn)出發(fā)，并以本部分研究，作為了后續(xù)研究的基礎(chǔ)。 第三部分主要是對(duì)中美文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資機(jī)制的比較，并分析了中國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資機(jī)制缺失的具體表現(xiàn)。在投資主體上，中國(guó)已形成了以政府投資為主導(dǎo)的投融資體系；而美國(guó)則建立了以政府投資為引導(dǎo)，社會(huì)資本積極參與的多樣化投融資體系。在政策支持上，中國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)政府政策支持體系尚不完善，具體表現(xiàn)在：稅收激勵(lì)力度不足，相關(guān)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)法律法規(guī)不健全等方面；而從美國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的政策支持體系來(lái)看：稅收激勵(lì)的力度更大，相關(guān)稅收減免政策更靈活，有關(guān)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律法規(guī)更為完備。在投融資機(jī)制創(chuàng)新上，中國(guó)的文化產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)歷了文化投融資體制改革的洗禮，在市場(chǎng)準(zhǔn)入限制逐步放開的情況下，投資主體更加多樣化；而美國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資機(jī)制的創(chuàng)新則更多的表現(xiàn)在金融產(chǎn)品的創(chuàng)新上，從而也為美國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)與金融資本的對(duì)接提供了有效的支持。而在中美文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資機(jī)制的比較上，中國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資機(jī)制的缺陷則在于其對(duì)規(guī)避投資風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的無(wú)效性上，，如投融資信息的不暢通、盜版的等問(wèn)題的存在。而要解決上述的投融資缺陷，則應(yīng)通過(guò)加快培育多元化投資主體、推進(jìn)投融資機(jī)制市場(chǎng)化改革以及完善政府政策支持等角度予以解決。 第四部分則對(duì)中美文化產(chǎn)業(yè)主要的投融資方式進(jìn)行了比較。中國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)目前已初步形成了財(cái)政投入、金融機(jī)構(gòu)貸款、資本市場(chǎng)上市融資以及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資等多元化的融資方式。美國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)則主要采用信貸融資、資本市場(chǎng)上市以及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)資本介入等融資方式。同時(shí)本文還分別從文化產(chǎn)業(yè)政策約束視角、商業(yè)模式視角以及金融創(chuàng)新等視角，對(duì)中美文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資方式進(jìn)行了比較分析。 第五部分主要是在對(duì)中美兩國(guó)投融資機(jī)制和投融資方式進(jìn)行比較分析的基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)兩國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)具體的投融資效率進(jìn)行了評(píng)價(jià)。兩國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)在投融資運(yùn)行機(jī)制以及投融資方式上的差異，最終會(huì)反映到兩國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資效率水平的差異上來(lái)。從分析結(jié)果來(lái)看，美國(guó)上市文化企業(yè)的整體投融資效率水平要高于中國(guó)。 第六部分則是在借鑒美國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上，提出了完善我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資體系的基本建議，即應(yīng)通過(guò)進(jìn)一步完善政策扶持體系，構(gòu)建文化產(chǎn)業(yè)多元化融資體系以及加快相關(guān)的投融資制度建設(shè)等方面來(lái)進(jìn)一步完善我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投融資體系。
[Abstract]:As a knowledge and capital intensive industry, the cultural industry is the foundation and guarantee of its sustained and healthy development. Therefore, the investment and financing problem of the cultural industry is a fundamental problem related to the development of cultural industry. In the present, the developed countries such as the United States have formed a more perfect investment in the development of the cultural industry in the past hundred years. The financing system has provided an important guarantee for the development of the culture industry in our country. The construction of cultural industry in our country is late, and the investment and financing system of the cultural industry is being built, and the problems such as the imperfect investment and financing mechanism of the cultural industry and the lack of investment and financing are the main bottlenecks that impede the further development of our cultural industry. On the basis of this, this article selects the Sino US cultural industry investment and financing comparison research topic, carries on the systematic analysis and the objective evaluation to the Sino US cultural industry investment and financing problem, in order to condenses the basic experience of the American cultural industry investment and financing, and provides the theoretical guidance and experience for the promotion of the development of China's cultural industry investment and financing. The study of the article is divided into six parts.
The first part is the introduction. This part mainly introduces the research background and significance of this paper, and reviews related literature on the related theories of investment and financing in cultural industry, the operating mechanism of investment and financing in cultural industry, the way of investment and financing and the efficiency of investment and financing. Meanwhile, this part is also the research method of this paper. And the arrangement of the structure, and points out the innovation and research deficiencies of this paper.
The second part mainly expounds the current situation of the Chinese and American cultural industry and the development of the investment and financing of the cultural industry. The research on the development of Chinese cultural industry mainly focuses on the analysis of the current situation of the development of Chinese cultural industry, the trend and the shortcomings of the existence, while the research on the investment and financing of Chinese cultural industry is also mainly analyzed in China. In the study of the development of American cultural industry, the main emphasis is on the analysis of the role of the American cultural industry in its economic development, the status of the development of cultural industry and the characteristics and experience of the development of the cultural industry, and in the study of the investment and financing of the American cultural industry, it is mainly Starting from summing up the characteristics and experience of investment and financing in the American cultural industry, this part is the basis for further research.
The third part mainly compares the investment and financing mechanism of the Sino US cultural industry, and analyzes the specific performance of the lack of investment and financing mechanism in the Chinese cultural industry. On the subject of investment, China has formed a investment and financing system dominated by government investment, while the United States has established the diversification of the active participation of the social capital in the guidance of the investment of the government. On the basis of policy support, the policy support system of the Chinese cultural industry government is not perfect. It is manifested in the following aspects: insufficient tax incentive and imperfect laws and regulations on intellectual property protection. From the policy support system of the American cultural industry, the tax incentives are stronger and the related tax relief policies are related. More flexible, the relevant laws and regulations on intellectual property are more complete. In the innovation of investment and financing mechanism, China's cultural industry has experienced the baptism of the reform of the cultural investment and financing system, and the investment subject is more diversified in the case of the gradual liberalization of the market access restrictions; and the innovation of the investment and financing mechanism of the American cultural industry is more manifested in the finance. The innovation of the product also provides effective support for the docking of American cultural industry and financial capital. In comparison with the investment and financing mechanism of China and the United States, the defects of the investment and financing mechanism of the Chinese cultural industry lie in the existence of the ineffectiveness of the investment risk avoidance, such as the unimpeded investment and financing information, and the existence of piracy. To solve the above defects, we should solve the problem by speeding up the cultivation of diversified investment bodies, promoting the market-oriented reform of the investment and financing mechanism and improving the support of the government policy.
The fourth part compares the major investment and financing methods of the Chinese and American cultural industries. The Chinese cultural industry has initially formed a preliminary financial investment, financial institution loans, capital market listed financing and venture investment. The American cultural industry mainly uses credit financing, capital market listing and venture capital. At the same time, this paper also makes a comparative analysis on the investment and financing methods of Chinese and American cultural industries from the perspective of cultural industry policy constraints, the perspective of business model and the financial innovation.
The fifth part is to evaluate the investment and financing efficiency of the two countries on the basis of a comparative analysis of the investment and financing mechanisms of China and the United States. The differences in the operating mechanism and the way of investment and financing in the two countries' cultural industries will ultimately reflect the level of investment and financing in the two countries. From the analysis results, the overall investment and financing efficiency of American listed cultural enterprises is higher than that of China.
The sixth part, based on the investment and financing experience of the American cultural industry, puts forward the basic suggestions to improve the investment and financing system of our cultural industry, that is to further perfect our country by further perfecting the policy support system, constructing the diversified financing system of cultural industry and speeding up the construction of the related investment and financing system. The investment and financing system of the cultural industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F832.4;F837.12;G124;G171.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 單文,韓福榮;三維空間企業(yè)生命周期模型[J];北京工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年01期

2 孫景民;;從經(jīng)濟(jì)的視角審視文化——論美國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)理論[J];北京工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年06期

3 宋常;劉司慧;;中國(guó)企業(yè)生命周期階段劃分及其度量研究[J];商業(yè)研究;2011年01期

4 孫斌華;孫清華;;拓展文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)融資正當(dāng)其時(shí)——對(duì)商業(yè)銀行拓展文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)融資的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];銀行家;2009年12期

5 劉海虹;國(guó)有企業(yè)融資效率與銀行危機(jī)相關(guān)問(wèn)題研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2000年03期

6 穆爭(zhēng)社;政府介入與融資市場(chǎng)效率提高的博弈分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2003年07期

7 董黎明;;債務(wù)融資期限結(jié)構(gòu)與融資效率的實(shí)證研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2008年06期

8 邵奇;;中國(guó)電影制作融資渠道的策略分析[J];當(dāng)代電影;2006年06期

9 謝鳳燕;;美國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)的執(zhí)法現(xiàn)狀及對(duì)我國(guó)的影響[J];對(duì)外經(jīng)貿(mào)實(shí)務(wù);2012年01期

10 郭建磊;;對(duì)美國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的反觀與思考[J];東岳論叢;2006年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 王愛平;[N];中國(guó)文化報(bào);2007年

2 曹瀅 張漢青;[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)參考報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 劉利成;支持文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的財(cái)政政策研究[D];財(cái)政部財(cái)政科學(xué)研究所;2011年

2 王新紅;我國(guó)高新技術(shù)企業(yè)融資效率研究[D];西北大學(xué);2007年

3 歐培彬;產(chǎn)業(yè)投資基金支持文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2009年

4 陳清華;中國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)投資機(jī)制創(chuàng)新研究[D];南京航空航天大學(xué);2009年

5 張斌;國(guó)際文化貿(mào)易壁壘研究[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

6 王建陵;基于創(chuàng)新優(yōu)勢(shì)的當(dāng)代美國(guó)動(dòng)畫產(chǎn)業(yè)國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2009年

7 霍步剛;國(guó)外文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展比較研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2009年

8 沈友華;我國(guó)企業(yè)融資效率及影響因素研究[D];江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：2036668