本文選題：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用 + 反壟斷法　； 參考：《中國海洋大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在當(dāng)今的市場經(jīng)濟(jì)條件下，知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)已經(jīng)不單單是企業(yè)維護(hù)自身合法利益的法律手段，更加成為了其謀求市場競爭優(yōu)勢，搶占市場份額的戰(zhàn)略化工具。權(quán)利人為了自身利益的最大化，以保護(hù)自身知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)為借口，，濫用知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)壟斷市場，非法限制競爭，損害公平自由的競爭秩序的現(xiàn)象也愈加頻發(fā)。 為了確保知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利的規(guī)范行使，發(fā)揮其促進(jìn)創(chuàng)新，提高生產(chǎn)力的積極作用。本文以反壟斷法和知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法之間的相互關(guān)系為切入點(diǎn)，著重闡釋了兩者之間的沖突一致性，對運(yùn)用反壟斷法規(guī)制知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用行為從必要性和可行性兩方面進(jìn)行理性分析，闡明對知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)限制競爭的行為進(jìn)行反壟斷法規(guī)制的不可替代性。并且總結(jié)發(fā)達(dá)國家對知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用行為的規(guī)制措施，結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)有相關(guān)法律的規(guī)定，提出我國規(guī)制知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用行為應(yīng)該完善的方面，主要從制定具體濫用行為的評估標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，出臺(tái)相關(guān)配套指南和法律解釋，明確反壟斷法執(zhí)法機(jī)構(gòu)三個(gè)方面進(jìn)行闡述。
[Abstract]:In the current market economy, intellectual property is not only a legal means for enterprises to safeguard their own legitimate interests, but also a strategic tool for them to seek market competitive advantage and seize market share. In order to maximize their own interests and to protect their own intellectual property rights abuse of intellectual property monopoly market illegal restrictions on competition and damage to the fair and free competition order has become more and more frequent. In order to ensure the normative exercise of intellectual property rights, it plays an active role in promoting innovation and increasing productivity. Based on the relationship between anti-monopoly law and intellectual property law, this paper focuses on the consistency of the conflict between the two, and makes a rational analysis of the necessity and feasibility of regulating the abuse of intellectual property rights by using anti-monopoly law. This paper clarifies the irreplaceable regulation of anti-monopoly law on the restriction of competition by intellectual property. And summarizes the developed countries to intellectual property abuse regulation measures, combined with the existing relevant laws in China, proposed that our regulation of intellectual property abuse should be improved, mainly from the formulation of specific abuse of the evaluation criteria. Relevant guidelines and legal explanations are issued to clarify the three aspects of anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國海洋大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294;D923.4;D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 王曉曄;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用行為的反壟斷法規(guī)制[J];法學(xué);2004年03期

2 張炳生;;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制[J];寧波大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué)版);2006年03期

3 王先林;;論我國反壟斷法在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的實(shí)施[J];上海交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年06期

4 孫玉蕓;陳奇?zhèn)?;從知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的國際立法看我國《反壟斷法》第55條的適用[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年11期

5 鄧志松;;反壟斷法與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法的一致與沖突[J];中國外資;2008年04期

6 徐胤;成巖;;反壟斷法與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)[J];中國外資;2008年09期

7 盧明純;;論反壟斷法在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域內(nèi)的適用[J];中南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

本文編號(hào)：1980880