本文選題：法律翻譯 + 法律術(shù)語　； 參考：《中國翻譯》2016年01期

【摘要】：本研究以國際協(xié)議的中文譯本與法律條文為基礎(chǔ),旨在比較知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法術(shù)語layout-design在大陸、臺(tái)灣及香港的譯名,進(jìn)而探尋其各自的性質(zhì)及翻譯策略。其中采用蘇珊·沙爾切維奇判定功能對(duì)等的三個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),即功能/結(jié)構(gòu)、適用范圍及法律效力,評(píng)估該術(shù)語三地的翻譯與國際條約源語的對(duì)等情況。此外,亦考察三地譯名借用現(xiàn)有法律詞匯之情況及交際功能。
[Abstract]:Based on the Chinese versions and legal texts of international agreements, this study aims to compare the translation of the intellectual property law term layout-design in mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong, and to explore their respective properties and translation strategies. Three criteria of functional equivalence, namely function / structure, scope of application and legal effect, are adopted to evaluate the equivalence between the translation of the term and the source language of international treaties. In addition, the translation of the names of the three places to borrow the existing legal vocabulary and communicative functions.
【作者單位】： 香港城市大學(xué);
【基金】：香港城市大學(xué)Strategic Research Grants資助計(jì)劃(No.7002650)部分撥款資助
【分類號(hào)】：H315.9
，

本文編號(hào)：1934513