本文選題：投資條約仲裁 + TRIPS�。� 參考：《國際商務(wù)(對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào))》2017年05期

【摘要】：近些年,投資條約仲裁已經(jīng)越來越多地被投資者當(dāng)作強(qiáng)有力的工具用來挑戰(zhàn)廣泛的東道國管理措施。本文以Philip Morris公司與澳大利亞和烏拉圭的投資仲裁為例,探討了東道國對(duì)WTO法律的違反構(gòu)成對(duì)FET標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的違反的可能性;分析了WTO和投資仲裁間的管轄權(quán)重疊或管轄權(quán)沖突可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致WTO法律體系碎片化的風(fēng)險(xiǎn);通過考察BIT背景下投資保護(hù)與其他國際條約相關(guān)條款,指出WTO成員應(yīng)發(fā)展更有效的規(guī)則以防止WTO法的整體性在投資條約中遭受來自投資者的過度干涉。
[Abstract]:In recent years, investment treaty arbitration has been increasingly used by investors as a powerful tool to challenge a wide range of host country management measures. Taking the investment arbitration between Philip Morris Company and Australia and Uruguay as an example, this paper discusses the possibility that the violation of WTO law by the host country constitutes the violation of FET standard. This paper analyzes the risk that the overlapping or conflict of jurisdiction between WTO and investment arbitration may lead to the fragmentation of the WTO legal system, and by examining the relevant articles of investment protection and other international treaties in the BIT context, It is pointed out that WTO members should develop more effective rules to prevent the integrity of WTO law from being excessively interfered with by investors in investment treaties.
【作者單位】： 吉林大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D997.1
，

本文編號(hào)：1930667