本文選題：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán) + 質(zhì)押�。� 參考：《沈陽(yáng)工業(yè)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)代，一個(gè)國(guó)家擁有的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)越多，就意味著在未來(lái)經(jīng)濟(jì)中擁有更多的控制權(quán)。其智力財(cái)富增長(zhǎng)得越快，經(jīng)濟(jì)也就越發(fā)達(dá)。因此，最大限度的創(chuàng)造和利用知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)成為各國(guó)積極探求經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的一個(gè)重要途徑。我國(guó)在《擔(dān)保法》和《物權(quán)法》中也肯定了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押的法律地位，但是實(shí)務(wù)中知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資的發(fā)展卻舉步維艱。這主要是由于我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押制度理論研究才剛剛起步，法律規(guī)范相對(duì)滯后，而現(xiàn)實(shí)需求強(qiáng)烈，尤其對(duì)于處在經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī)的科技型中小企業(yè)。因此，我國(guó)相關(guān)理論缺乏，難以為知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押實(shí)踐提供良策。 鑒于此，文章對(duì)我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押制度進(jìn)行了闡述和分析，并在此基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)國(guó)外的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)進(jìn)行研究和借鑒，以期對(duì)我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押制度理論研究有所裨益。首先，本文運(yùn)用了邏輯分析法對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押的基本理論進(jìn)行分析，，該理論部分包括知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押的相關(guān)概念、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押的理論依據(jù)和法律依據(jù)、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押的構(gòu)成要件以及客體范圍；其次，運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)分析和實(shí)證分析法對(duì)我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行多方面的分析，包括知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律體系、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押客體、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押登記、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押保全以及知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押評(píng)估等五個(gè)方面，并歸納總結(jié)出我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押在上述幾個(gè)方面中存在的問(wèn)題；再次，運(yùn)用比較分析法，通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)外發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押的上述五個(gè)方面現(xiàn)狀的比較研究，得出對(duì)我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押制度的有益啟示；最后，在對(duì)前文分析概況的基礎(chǔ)上，提出在法律體系方面制定單行法、在質(zhì)押客體方面擴(kuò)大客體范圍，并從我國(guó)現(xiàn)行知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押評(píng)估、登記、保全等具體實(shí)踐中，有針對(duì)性地提出在登記中統(tǒng)一登記規(guī)則，在保全中完善提存制度，在評(píng)估中明確評(píng)估人員的法律責(zé)任等具體建議。
[Abstract]:In the era of knowledge economy, the more intellectual property a country has, the more control it will have in the future economy. The faster its intellectual wealth grows, the more developed the economy will be. Therefore, creating and utilizing intellectual property to the maximum extent has become an important way for countries to actively explore economic development. Our country also affirmed the legal status of intellectual property pledge in the guarantee Law and Real right Law, but the development of intellectual property pledge financing is difficult in practice. This is mainly due to the fact that the theoretical study of intellectual property pledge system in China has just started, the legal norms are relatively lagging behind, and the actual demand is strong, especially for the small and medium-sized technological enterprises in economic crisis. Therefore, the lack of relevant theories in China makes it difficult to provide a good strategy for the practice of intellectual property pledge. In view of this, the article expounds and analyzes the intellectual property pledge system of our country, and on this basis studies and draws lessons from the successful experience of foreign countries, in order to be beneficial to the theoretical research of intellectual property pledge system in our country. First of all, this paper analyzes the basic theory of intellectual property pledge by logical analysis, which includes the related concepts of intellectual property pledge, the theoretical basis and legal basis of intellectual property pledge. Secondly, using literature analysis and empirical analysis to analyze the current situation of intellectual property pledge financing in China, including intellectual property legal system, intellectual property pledge object, The registration of intellectual property pledge, the preservation of intellectual property pledge and the evaluation of intellectual property pledge are summarized, and the problems of intellectual property pledge in the above mentioned aspects are summarized. Thirdly, the comparative analysis method is used. Through the comparative study on the five aspects of intellectual property pledge in foreign developed countries, the author draws some useful inspiration to our country's intellectual property pledge system. Finally, on the basis of analyzing the general situation of intellectual property pledge, In the aspect of legal system, the author puts forward a separate law, expands the scope of the object in the aspect of pledge object, and puts forward the unified registration rules in registration from the concrete practice of current intellectual property pledge evaluation, registration, preservation and so on in our country. To perfect the deposit system in the preservation, and to evaluate the legal responsibility of the personnel in the evaluation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽(yáng)工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.4;D923.2;D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉沛佩;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資的法律依據(jù)與制度重構(gòu)[J];重慶社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年12期

2 祝寧波;吳玲;;美國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保變現(xiàn)的法律與實(shí)踐[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年02期

3 謝黎偉;;著作權(quán)質(zhì)押的困境和出路[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年09期

4 高圣平;;著作權(quán)出質(zhì)登記制度若干問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué);2010年06期

5 高映;周平;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)資本化的若干法律思考[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬刊);2009年12期

6 何憲;;提存制度有關(guān)問(wèn)題研究[J];中國(guó)司法;2009年08期

7 李龍;;日本知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資和評(píng)估[J];華東理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年04期

8 李鵑;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)擔(dān)保融資的可行性探討[J];山西警官高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

9 李希義;蔣t;;政府支持下的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押貸款模式及其特征分析[J];科技與法律;2009年05期

10 黎四奇;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)質(zhì)押融資的障礙及其克服[J];理論探索;2008年04期

本文編號(hào)：1925235