本文選題：識別功能 + 過錯責任�。� 參考：《四川省社會科學院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在知識經(jīng)濟時代，伴隨市場經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)越來越受到到市場主體的重視，可以說知識產(chǎn)權(quán)已經(jīng)成為市場主體在市場競爭中取勝的核心因素。由于法律的滯后性，在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領域表現(xiàn)出糾紛難以化解的局面。在市場競爭中如何化解紛繁復雜的糾紛,關(guān)系市場公平合理和有序發(fā)展。文字商標權(quán)和商號權(quán)作為市場主體在市場競爭中所使用的兩項重要權(quán)利，越來越受到市場主體的重視。在市場主體對兩項權(quán)利重視程度不斷提高的同時，兩項權(quán)利之間的法律沖突問題也日益突出。究其原因，主要在于管理制度的固有缺陷；二者承載商譽功能的重合；經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的一體化；漢字的有限性和詞組的近似性的問題,導致兩項權(quán)利的法律沖突問題的凸顯。通過對兩項權(quán)利沖突產(chǎn)生原因的分析可以看出，兩項權(quán)利沖突問題難以避免且普遍存在，可以說兩項權(quán)利之間的沖突已經(jīng)阻礙了市場的有序發(fā)展。文章通過對兩項權(quán)利沖突的分析，將兩項權(quán)利之間的沖突大致歸為：惡意造成的二者沖突；非惡意造成的二者沖突；未注冊文字商標權(quán)與商號權(quán)的沖突三大類。之所以提出上述分類，是因為上述三類沖突有著各自的特點，便于針對不同類型的沖突采取不同的解決方式。兩項權(quán)利沖突問題的復雜性決定了二者沖突的解決不可能采用單一的解決方式，應該采取多元而且有主次之分的解決方式。以侵權(quán)責任構(gòu)成為主，輔之以合理使用制度、不當?shù)美贫纫约胺床徽敻偁幹贫热セ舛咧g的沖突，規(guī)范市場競爭行為。惡意造成的二者之間的沖突一般來說，，應該從侵權(quán)責任構(gòu)成和反不正當競爭的角度進行規(guī)制，對非惡意造成的二者沖突和未注冊文字商標權(quán)與商號權(quán)的沖突，更多的是運用合理使用制度和不當?shù)美贫冗M行化解。在侵權(quán)責任構(gòu)成中應該采過錯責任作為歸責原則，因果關(guān)系上采相當因果關(guān)系中的折衷說較為可取，責任承擔中加大侵權(quán)者的違法成本。重視合理使用制度和不當?shù)美贫葘身棛?quán)利在行使過程中，指導和調(diào)解作用的發(fā)揮，充分發(fā)揮反不正當競爭制度對兩項權(quán)利沖突協(xié)調(diào)的作用。文章首先對兩項權(quán)利的異同點做了比較，接著分析了兩項權(quán)利之間沖突產(chǎn)生的原因，將兩項權(quán)利之間的沖突劃分為三大類以及對兩項權(quán)利之間沖突的解決方案進一步做了探討，基于上述內(nèi)容的研究為兩項權(quán)利之間沖突的化解提出了一些建議。通過法律的形式明確商譽保護的規(guī)定；嚴格規(guī)范企業(yè)名稱權(quán)使用制度；強化在商品或服務中商標的識別功能；明確兩項權(quán)利沖突情境下的不正當競爭行為，達到為兩項沖突的解決提供更加明確法律依據(jù)的目的。兩項權(quán)利沖突的產(chǎn)生不是一朝一夕的結(jié)果，因此兩項權(quán)利沖突的化解也需要一個不斷完善的過程。沖突的化解應該以實現(xiàn)運用兩項權(quán)利有序競爭為目標，從這一目標出發(fā)去研究兩項權(quán)利之間的法律沖突問題，是文中始終堅持的理念。
[Abstract]:In the era of knowledge economy, with the development of market economy, intellectual property has been paid more and more attention to the main body of the market. It can be said that intellectual property has become the core factor for the market main body to win in the market competition. Because of the lag of law, it shows the difficult situation in the field of intellectual property rights. As the two important rights used by the market subject in the market competition, the right of word trademark and business name has been paid more and more attention by the main body of the market. At the same time, the legal conflict between the two rights of the two rights is at the same time as the market main body attaches great importance to the two rights. The main reason is that the inherent defects of the management system are mainly due to the inherent defects of the management system; the two parties carry the function of goodwill, the integration of the economic development, the limited character of Chinese characters and the approximation of the phrases, which lead to the prominence of the conflict of law of the two rights. Through the analysis of the causes of the conflicts between the two rights and interests, two items can be seen. The conflict of rights is difficult to avoid and widespread. It can be said that the conflict between the two rights has hindered the orderly development of the market. Through the analysis of the conflict of the two rights, the conflict between the two rights is roughly classified as the two conflicts caused by maliciously; the non malicious two party conflicts; the unregistered trademark rights and the unregistered trademark rights There are three categories of conflicts in the right of business names. The reason why the above classification is made is because the above three types of conflicts have their own characteristics and are easy to take different solutions to different types of conflicts. The complexity of the two conflicts of rights determines that the solution of the two party conflicts is impossible to adopt a single one solution, and should take multiple and main ways. The solution of the sub division is based on the tort liability, supplemented by the rational use system, the unjust enrichment system and the anti unfair competition system to resolve the conflict between the two parties and standardize the market competition behavior. In general, the conflict between the two parties, which is caused by maliciously, should be carried out from the angle of the constitution of the rights invading and the anti unfair competition. The regulation, the conflict between the two party conflicts and the unregistered characters and the right of the trade name, is more to use the rational use system and the unjust enrichment system. In the constitution of the tort liability, the fault liability should be taken as the liability principle, and the compromise in the causality of the causality is preferable. We should pay more attention to the illegal costs of the infringers. Pay attention to the role of the two rights in the exercise of the rational use system and the unjust enrichment system, and give full play to the role of the anti unfair competition system on the coordination of the two rights conflicts. The article first compares the differences between the two rights, and then analyzes the two rights. The causes of the conflict between the two rights are divided into three categories and the solutions to the conflicts between the two rights are further discussed. The research based on the above content puts forward some suggestions for the resolution of the conflict between the two rights. The use of the name right system; strengthen the recognition function of the trademark in the commodity or service; clear the unfair competition in the situation of the conflict of the two rights to provide more clear legal basis for the settlement of the two conflicts. The emergence of the conflict of the two rights is not the result of one day and one day, so the resolution of the conflict of the two rights also needs to be resolved The resolution of the conflict should be aimed at the realization of the orderly competition of the two rights. From this goal, the study of the conflict of laws between the two rights is the idea that the article has always adhered to.
【學位授予單位】：四川省社會科學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.43

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高榮林;;商標領域合理使用的檢討與重構(gòu)[J];中華商標;2011年02期

2 何培育;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)促成性事由探究[J];法商研究;2011年01期

3 吳漢東;;關(guān)于合理使用制度的民法學思考[J];法學家;1996年06期

4 朱虎;;過錯侵權(quán)責任的發(fā)生基礎[J];法學家;2011年01期

5 謝曉堯;論識別性標示的競爭法保護[J];法學評論;2000年03期

6 楊淑霞,李彬;論注冊商標的合理使用[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學院學報;2004年03期

7 熊英;別智;;注冊商標合理使用分析[J];中國工商管理研究;2009年07期

8 李揚;許清;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)人停止侵害請求權(quán)的限制[J];法學家;2012年06期

9 劉言浩;;不當?shù)美械囊蚬P(guān)系[J];東方法學;2013年01期

10 章禮強;論統(tǒng)一的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法的幾個問題[J];安徽理工大學學報(社會科學版);2003年04期

本文編號：1905594