發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-15 22:16

  本文選題：著作權(quán) + 權(quán)利沖突　； 參考：《寧波大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著科技的進(jìn)步和經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展，受法律保護(hù)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)品日益增多，知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)范圍日益擴(kuò)大，也由于人們對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)品的占有不像對(duì)有形物質(zhì)產(chǎn)品那樣實(shí)在而具體，而是表現(xiàn)為認(rèn)識(shí)和利用，所以知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域容易產(chǎn)生權(quán)利間的沖突。本文從有瑕疵的著作權(quán)權(quán)利沖突的角度進(jìn)行分析，試圖提出能夠完善我國(guó)著作權(quán)權(quán)利沖突的化解機(jī)制。 本文的第一部分主要概括著作權(quán)權(quán)利沖突的情形、原因及影響。其中，著作權(quán)權(quán)利沖突的情形主要有三種：著作權(quán)與其他著作權(quán)的沖突，著作權(quán)與商標(biāo)權(quán)的沖突、著作權(quán)與外觀(guān)設(shè)計(jì)專(zhuān)利權(quán)的沖突。這些沖突產(chǎn)生的原因有三個(gè)：內(nèi)在原因、外部原因及制度原因。這些沖突的產(chǎn)生對(duì)法律，對(duì)市場(chǎng)秩序及對(duì)當(dāng)事人都有消極的影響。本文以此作為全文研究的背景和基礎(chǔ)資料，對(duì)著作權(quán)權(quán)利權(quán)沖突的化解機(jī)制進(jìn)行探討。 本文的第二部分闡述了我國(guó)現(xiàn)行法律對(duì)著作權(quán)權(quán)利沖突的化解機(jī)制及其存在的問(wèn)題。雖然關(guān)于著作權(quán)權(quán)利沖突的化解機(jī)制被分散在各部知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法中，并且都以不同的處理方法去化解，但是殊途同歸，我國(guó)法律為了鼓勵(lì)首創(chuàng)，減少?zèng)_突，將法律的天平傾向了在先著作權(quán)一方。我國(guó)法律對(duì)化解著作權(quán)權(quán)利沖突的規(guī)定雖然已經(jīng)很詳盡，但是仍然存在實(shí)體和程序上的各種問(wèn)題。 本文的第三部分是對(duì)其他相關(guān)國(guó)家關(guān)于化解著作權(quán)權(quán)利沖突化解機(jī)制的考察。“相對(duì)保護(hù)在先權(quán)利原則”、“經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值分析原則”以及“利益平衡原則”是國(guó)際上化解知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突的基本原則，各國(guó)在貫徹這些原則的做法上都體現(xiàn)了自己的特色，，他山之玉可以攻石，筆者希望在前人的基礎(chǔ)上盡可能地考察更多的國(guó)外立法，試圖找到能夠完善我國(guó)化解著作權(quán)權(quán)利沖突的可借鑒的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。 本文的第四部分以前三部分為基礎(chǔ)，就如何完善我國(guó)化解著作權(quán)權(quán)利沖突的機(jī)制提出了筆者的建議。筆者認(rèn)為應(yīng)當(dāng)以堅(jiān)持衡平理念下的保護(hù)在先權(quán)利為原則；以完善相關(guān)法律制度為手段；以完善救濟(jì)制度為保障，三管齊下，化解著作權(quán)權(quán)利沖突。
[Abstract]:With the progress of science and technology and the development of economy, the number of knowledge products protected by law is increasing day by day, and the scope of intellectual property protection is expanding day by day. Instead, it is manifested in recognition and utilization, so intellectual property rights field is prone to conflict between rights. Based on the analysis of the defective conflict of copyright rights, this paper tries to put forward a mechanism to resolve the conflict of copyright rights in China. The first part of this paper summarizes the conflict of copyright rights, reasons and effects. Among them, there are three kinds of conflict of copyright right: the conflict between copyright and other copyright, the conflict between copyright and trademark right, and the conflict between copyright and design patent right. There are three reasons for these conflicts: internal reasons, external causes and institutional reasons. These conflicts have negative effects on the law, market order and the parties concerned. This paper takes this as the background and basic material of the full text research, and probes into the mechanism of resolving the conflict of copyright rights and rights. The second part of this paper expounds the mechanism and existing problems of the conflict of copyright rights under the current law of our country. Although the mechanism of resolving the conflict of copyright rights has been scattered in the intellectual property laws of various departments and is resolved in different ways, the same way is achieved. In order to encourage the initiative, the laws of our country reduce the conflict. Tilt the balance of the law to the prior copyright party. Although the provisions of Chinese law to resolve the conflict of copyright rights are very detailed, there are still various substantive and procedural problems. The third part is about the mechanism of resolving the conflict of copyright rights in other countries. The principle of relative protection of prior rights, the principle of economic value analysis and the principle of balance of interests are the basic principles for resolving the conflict of intellectual property rights in the world. The author hopes to investigate more foreign legislation on the basis of predecessors, and try to find out the experience that can be used for reference to solve the conflict of copyright rights in our country. On the basis of the first three parts of this paper, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the mechanism of resolving the conflict of copyright rights in our country. The author believes that the principle of upholding the principle of equalizing the protection of prior rights; the improvement of the relevant legal system as a means; to improve the relief system as the protection, three-pronged approach to resolve the conflict of copyright rights.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高榮林;;向前看:解決商標(biāo)權(quán)與著作權(quán)沖突的另一種思路[J];中華商標(biāo);2010年11期

2 周詳;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突若干問(wèn)題研究[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2004年07期

3 楊才然;;與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有關(guān)的權(quán)利沖突協(xié)調(diào)原則之理論基礎(chǔ)[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年11期

4 陳麗娟,鄭光輝;商標(biāo)合理使用制度及其立法完善[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

5 王蓉;從楊某噪聲案看權(quán)利沖突的衡平和通約[J];法學(xué)雜志;2002年02期

6 李閣霞;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利沖突探析[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年01期

7 謝曉堯;論識(shí)別性標(biāo)示的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法保護(hù)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年03期

8 吳漢東;關(guān)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)本體、主體與客體的重新認(rèn)識(shí)——以財(cái)產(chǎn)所有權(quán)為比較研究對(duì)象[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年05期

9 張振杰;;對(duì)著作權(quán)領(lǐng)域權(quán)利沖突問(wèn)題的法律分析[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下半月);2007年06期

10 蘇敏;;外觀(guān)設(shè)計(jì)專(zhuān)利權(quán)與著作權(quán)沖突原因淺析[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年10期

本文編號(hào)：1894175