發(fā)布時間：2018-05-11 06:21

  本文選題：網(wǎng)絡服務提供者 + 信息網(wǎng)絡傳播權��； 參考：《中國政法大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：信息網(wǎng)絡傳播權是伴隨互聯(lián)網(wǎng)產(chǎn)業(yè)飛速發(fā)展而產(chǎn)生的一種新權利。我國為落實《世界知識產(chǎn)權組織版權條約》和《世界知識產(chǎn)權組織表演和錄音制品條約》而新增加一種著作鄰接權：信息網(wǎng)絡傳播權。網(wǎng)絡服務提供者既包括內容提供者,也包括中介服務提供者,在其經(jīng)營活動中可能直接侵犯或間接侵犯信息網(wǎng)絡傳播權。直接侵權責任和間接侵權責任這一理論來源于英美法,間接侵權最早來自專利法,后通過法院判例延伸至著作權法領域。在全球范圍內注重保護“信息網(wǎng)絡傳播權”的大背景下,“直接侵權”指未經(jīng)許可擅自實施信息網(wǎng)絡傳播行為,“間接侵權”指行為人雖沒有直接實施信息網(wǎng)絡傳播行為,但是行為人通過教唆、提供物質技術條件幫助直接侵權人。出于增強對著作權人權益保護的目的,多國的公共政策把這類行為也視為侵犯信息網(wǎng)絡傳播權。直接侵權和間接侵權的劃分有助于實現(xiàn)著作權權利人、網(wǎng)絡用戶和信息網(wǎng)絡傳播者之問的利益平衡。我國雖然還沒有從法律上正式采用直接侵權和間接侵權概念,但是學者們已經(jīng)對此作了豐富的研究,最新的立法動向表明司法界已經(jīng)接納了這一理論。盡管我國有很多關于著作權間接侵權問題的理論研究,但還少有文章系統(tǒng)地比較比較網(wǎng)絡服務提供者的直接侵權和間接侵權責任。本文在運用之前理論成果的基礎上,通過理論分析、實證分析、文本分析等方法,討論目前有關直接侵權和間接侵權的幾大主要問題和爭議,試圖對這些問題有更加清晰的理解。 本文主要分為四部分,第一部分為引言,伴隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術和網(wǎng)絡經(jīng)濟的繁榮發(fā)展,網(wǎng)絡侵權愈演愈烈。間接侵權理論的引入有助于實現(xiàn)權利人、信息網(wǎng)絡傳播者和網(wǎng)絡用戶之間的利益平衡。第二部分介紹直接侵權和間接侵權理論的域外淵源。第三部分介紹有關直接侵權和間接侵權的概念、區(qū)分標準等基本理論。第四部分探討有關直接侵權和間接侵權的三個主要爭議問題：間接侵權是否等同于共同侵權；直接侵權是否應當適用無過錯責任而間接侵權應當適用過錯責任；網(wǎng)絡服務提供者的審查義務是否等于注意義務。第五部分為結論,總結了直接侵權和間接侵權的區(qū)分標準和具體歸責原則,進一步強調該理論在實現(xiàn)利益相關者之間利益平衡的重要意義。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of Internet industry, the right of information network communication is a new right. In order to implement the copyright Treaty of the World intellectual property Organization (WIPO) and the Treaty on performances and Phonograms of the World intellectual property Organization (WIPO), China has added a new right of adjacent works: the right to disseminate information on the Internet. Network service providers include both content providers and intermediary service providers, which may directly or indirectly violate the right of information network dissemination in their business activities. The theory of direct tort liability and indirect tort liability originates from the Anglo-American law. The indirect tort comes from patent law at first and then extends to copyright law through court cases. Under the background of paying attention to the protection of "information network communication right" in the world, "direct infringement" refers to the unauthorized implementation of information network communication behavior, and "indirect infringement" refers to the person who has not directly carried out information network communication behavior. However, the perpetrator provides material and technical conditions to help the direct infringer through instigation. For the purpose of strengthening the protection of the rights and interests of copyright owners, the public policies of many countries regard such acts as infringing on the right of information network dissemination. The division of direct and indirect infringement helps to balance the interests of copyright owners, network users and information network communicators. Although China has not formally adopted the concepts of direct and indirect tort in law, scholars have done a lot of research on it, and the latest legislative trend shows that the judicial circles have accepted this theory. Although there are many theoretical studies on indirect copyright infringement in China, there are few articles systematically comparing the direct infringement and indirect tort liability of network service provider. On the basis of previous theoretical achievements, this paper discusses several major issues and disputes concerning direct and indirect infringement through theoretical analysis, empirical analysis, text analysis and so on. Try to have a clearer understanding of these problems. This paper is mainly divided into four parts, the first part is the introduction, with the prosperity of Internet technology and network economy, network infringement becomes more and more serious. The introduction of indirect tort theory helps to balance the interests of the right holder, the information network disseminator and the network user. The second part introduces the theory of direct and indirect tort. The third part introduces the concepts of direct tort and indirect tort, and differentiates the basic theories. The fourth part discusses three main controversial issues concerning direct and indirect tort: whether indirect tort is equivalent to joint tort, whether direct tort should be applied to liability without fault, and whether indirect tort should be applied to fault liability; Whether the obligation of censorship of network service provider is equal to obligation of care. The fifth part is the conclusion, summarizes the distinction standard and specific imputation principle of direct and indirect tort, and further emphasizes the importance of this theory in realizing the balance of interests among stakeholders.
【學位授予單位】：中國政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 王遷;;視頻分享網(wǎng)站著作權侵權問題再研究[J];法商研究;2010年01期

2 王遷;;論“網(wǎng)絡傳播行為”的界定及其侵權認定[J];法學;2006年05期

，

本文編號：1872780