本文選題：自媒體平臺(tái)提供者 + 信息管控　； 參考：《對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)》2017年博士論文

【摘要】：本文主要研究的法律問(wèn)題是,用戶(hù)在網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)上發(fā)布與傳播的網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息被自媒體平臺(tái)服務(wù)提供者采取刪除、屏蔽等措施,或者網(wǎng)絡(luò)賬號(hào)被采取暫時(shí)封禁或永久關(guān)閉技術(shù)措施的情況下,該用戶(hù)可以要求自媒體平臺(tái)服務(wù)提供者承擔(dān)何種民事責(zé)任,侵權(quán)或是違約?本文的論述就是圍繞這一主要問(wèn)題層層展開(kāi):首先,本文明確了探討這一法律問(wèn)題的必要性,在用戶(hù)發(fā)布或傳播的信息被網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者無(wú)辜刪除的情況下,人們常常潛意識(shí)的認(rèn)為自己的網(wǎng)絡(luò)言論自由受到了侵犯,因此在理論上澄清這是否對(duì)用戶(hù)構(gòu)成侵犯這一法律問(wèn)題實(shí)屬重要,因?yàn)檫@不僅涉及到傳統(tǒng)的民事權(quán)利理論在網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中的適用,還涉及到我們對(duì)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)自由的深刻認(rèn)知。其次,基于web2.0技術(shù)模式下的網(wǎng)絡(luò)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀、自媒體平臺(tái)的公共性等特點(diǎn),本文在第二章中系統(tǒng)介紹了自媒體平臺(tái)服務(wù)提供者信息管控義務(wù)產(chǎn)生的法律基礎(chǔ),以及這種義務(wù)的存在可能對(duì)用戶(hù)享有網(wǎng)絡(luò)自由帶來(lái)的消極影響,例如有償刪帖、錯(cuò)誤管控、過(guò)度管控等失范現(xiàn)象的發(fā)生。在第三章中,本文以實(shí)踐中發(fā)生的具體案例作為討論問(wèn)題的限縮線索和主線,深入分析了自媒體平臺(tái)服務(wù)提供者刪除用戶(hù)信息是否其三種權(quán)益:是否侵犯其知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán),具體指的是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)中的發(fā)表權(quán)和信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán);是否侵犯用戶(hù)的消費(fèi)者權(quán)益;是否侵犯用戶(hù)的言論自由。其中,本文重點(diǎn)分析了用戶(hù)信息被刪除與用戶(hù)言論自由基本權(quán)利受損之間的關(guān)系,并得出二者不具有等同關(guān)系的結(jié)論。在第四章中,本文主要對(duì)違約性的后果是否成立進(jìn)行了討論和分析。在司法實(shí)踐中,曾有用戶(hù)以其與網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者之間簽訂有用戶(hù)服務(wù)協(xié)議為由,要求法院判令對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者任意刪帖或查封帳號(hào)的行為構(gòu)成違約�；诖�,本章主要對(duì)用戶(hù)與自媒體平臺(tái)服務(wù)提供者之間的相對(duì)性關(guān)系進(jìn)行分析和考察,探究在類(lèi)似案例中用戶(hù)以違約責(zé)任為由提起法律之訴的合理性以及在現(xiàn)實(shí)情況下面臨的困難,包括用戶(hù)注冊(cè)協(xié)議的效力,合同的無(wú)償性是否影響違約責(zé)任的承擔(dān),合同中程序性義務(wù)的缺失等問(wèn)題。在第五章中,本文在前幾章論述的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中用戶(hù)對(duì)信息享有某種權(quán)利的觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了探討和反思,即用戶(hù)是信息的創(chuàng)造者,因此其對(duì)于該信息有著絕對(duì)的支配權(quán)和壟斷權(quán)這種觀點(diǎn)。此外,這種觀點(diǎn)也將其與某一自媒體平臺(tái)服務(wù)提供者之間基于用戶(hù)注冊(cè)協(xié)議而成立的契約無(wú)限放大至整個(gè)網(wǎng)絡(luò),進(jìn)而得出了自媒體平臺(tái)服務(wù)提供者的行為屬于侵權(quán)行為。但事實(shí)上,如前文所述,當(dāng)我們仔細(xì)研判種種侵犯的權(quán)利類(lèi)型是否成立時(shí),根據(jù)現(xiàn)有的理論體系往往無(wú)法得出恰當(dāng)?shù)慕Y(jié)論。對(duì)此,本章所要討論的內(nèi)容就是對(duì)這一現(xiàn)象背后的原因進(jìn)行反思和探討,主要就兩個(gè)主要問(wèn)題進(jìn)行討論:第一,承載信息的網(wǎng)絡(luò)數(shù)據(jù)只是一種載體,還是構(gòu)成權(quán)利體系中的客體?第二,當(dāng)自媒體平臺(tái)服務(wù)提供者違規(guī)刪除用戶(hù)信息后,究竟是何種利益受到傷害?在第六章中,本文通過(guò)對(duì)自媒體平臺(tái)提供者信息管控的民事后果進(jìn)行分析和探討之后,認(rèn)為用戶(hù)在網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中享有的是一種選擇性的自由與秩序性利益,從整個(gè)人類(lèi)和社會(huì)的發(fā)展角度看,這種利益仍是需要加以保護(hù)的,但上升到絕對(duì)權(quán)的保護(hù)高度是欠妥當(dāng)?shù)?因?yàn)榫W(wǎng)絡(luò)信息一經(jīng)產(chǎn)生便不具有唯一性的特性使得用戶(hù)無(wú)法對(duì)其進(jìn)行獨(dú)占性的支配。
[Abstract]:The legal problem of this article is that the user can ask what people from the media platform service provider to publish and spread the network information on the network platform by the self media platform service provider to delete, shield and other measures, or when the network account is temporarily blocked or permanently closed. Responsibility, tort, or breach of contract? This article is discussed around this main problem: first, the civilization is sure to discuss the necessity of this legal problem, and when the information that the user releases or disseminated is deleted by the network service provider, people often subconsciously think that their freedom of speech is invaded. Therefore, it is important to clarify whether this is a legal problem for users in theory, because it not only involves the application of the traditional theory of civil rights in the cyberspace, but also involves a deep understanding of the freedom of the network. Secondly, the current status of network development based on the Web2.0 technology model, the public from the media platform. In the second chapter, this paper systematically introduces the legal basis of the information management obligation of the self media platform service provider, and the negative influence that the existence of this obligation may bring to the users' freedom of the network, such as the occurrence of the anomie phenomena such as compensated deleting, error control, and excessive management and control. In the third chapter, this paper As the clue and main line of the discussion, it analyzes the three rights and interests of the self media platform service provider to delete the user information: whether it infringes its intellectual property rights, specifically refers to the right to publish and the information network transmission in intellectual property rights, whether infringement of the user's rights and interests of consumers or not. This article focuses on the analysis of the relationship between the deletion of user information and the damage to the basic rights of the user's freedom of speech, and draws the conclusion that the two does not have the equivalent relationship. In the fourth chapter, this paper discusses and analyzes the establishment of the consequences of default. In judicial practice, there have been users in the judicial practice. On the basis of signing a user service agreement with the network service provider, it requires the court to order a breach of default. Based on this, this chapter mainly analyzes and investigates the relative relationship between the user and the service provider of the self media platform, and explores the users in similar cases. The rationality of the liability for breach of contract and the difficulties faced in the reality, including the validity of the user registration agreement, whether the compensation of the contract will affect the liability for breach of contract and the lack of procedural obligation in the contract. In the fifth chapter, on the basis of the previous chapters, this article is for the users in the cyberspace. The view that information has a certain right is discussed and reflected that the user is the creator of information, so it has the absolute dominance and monopolization of the information. In addition, this view also extends the contract to a certain self media platform service provider based on the user registration agreement. In fact, as mentioned in the previous article, when we carefully judge whether the types of infringements are set up, we can not get the proper conclusion according to the existing theoretical system. The content of this chapter is behind the phenomenon. The reasons for the reflection and discussion, mainly on the two main issues to discuss: first, the network data carrying information is only a carrier, or the object of the right system? Second, when the media platform service provider violating user information, what kind of interests are hurt? In the sixth chapter, this article through the self After the analysis and discussion of the civil consequences of the information management and control of the media platform provider, it is considered that the user enjoys a selective free and orderly interest in the cyberspace. From the perspective of the development of the whole human and the society, this interest is still needed to be protected, but it is not appropriate to rise to the protection of the absolute right. Once the network information is generated, it does not have a unique nature, which makes it impossible for users to dominate the network.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923
，

本文編號(hào)：1870421