本文選題：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)市場(chǎng)支配地位 + 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利濫用��； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)旨在提高整個(gè)社會(huì)的公共利益的法律制度,自其誕生之時(shí)便與“壟斷”產(chǎn)生了互為依存之關(guān)系。在市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)中,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)和反壟斷法兩者之間既存在著目標(biāo)上的一致性,又存在著實(shí)施過(guò)程的沖突性。 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)具有一定的壟斷性,它既能根據(jù)法律規(guī)定給權(quán)利人帶來(lái)經(jīng)濟(jì)利益,同時(shí)也存在被權(quán)利人濫用的風(fēng)險(xiǎn),并且這種濫用往往讓權(quán)利人在市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)排斥、限制競(jìng)爭(zhēng)從而獲得壟斷性的利益。隨著改革開放的不斷深入,很多外國(guó)企業(yè)利用我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律環(huán)境不健全的情況,通過(guò)搭售、拒絕許可、價(jià)格歧視、超高定價(jià)等不當(dāng)手段,通過(guò)其擁有的市場(chǎng)支配地位,限制受讓方和第三方在技術(shù)許可使用、技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓等領(lǐng)域的只有競(jìng)爭(zhēng)地位,嚴(yán)重的危害到我國(guó)民族工業(yè)的發(fā)展以及產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí),同時(shí)也損害市場(chǎng)相對(duì)主體消費(fèi)者的切身利益。但是,《反壟斷法》出臺(tái)較晚,針對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的規(guī)定僅有第55條,少之甚少,與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有關(guān)的反壟斷執(zhí)法指南雖已經(jīng)研究到第五稿,但是正式出臺(tái)的時(shí)間還不明晰。 筆者在本文中通過(guò)對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)市場(chǎng)支配地位及相關(guān)要素的分析和界定,以及對(duì)于如何進(jìn)行反壟斷規(guī)制內(nèi)容的研究,希望能夠精細(xì)化我國(guó)反壟斷法在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)市場(chǎng)支配地位方面的執(zhí)法,通過(guò)學(xué)習(xí)和借鑒國(guó)際立法和司法實(shí)踐,為中國(guó)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)市場(chǎng)支配地位的反壟斷規(guī)制提出少許的完善建議。 本文共分五章展開：第一章通過(guò)對(duì)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法與反壟斷法之間的關(guān)系以及我國(guó)在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)市場(chǎng)支配地位反壟斷法規(guī)制中存在的問(wèn)題來(lái)介紹我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)市場(chǎng)支配地位反壟斷法規(guī)制的現(xiàn)狀；第二章著重介紹知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)市場(chǎng)支配地位形成的原因以及知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)市場(chǎng)支配地位的界定,希望通過(guò)這兩方面的介紹能夠給本文的分析奠定理論基礎(chǔ)；第三章通過(guò)對(duì)于美國(guó)、歐盟和日本知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)反壟斷領(lǐng)域規(guī)制立法以及規(guī)制實(shí)踐的簡(jiǎn)要介紹,給我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)市場(chǎng)支配地位反壟斷法規(guī)制予以參考；第四章將知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)市場(chǎng)支配地位反壟斷法規(guī)制和知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利濫用的進(jìn)行比較,明確市場(chǎng)支配地位與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利濫用的區(qū)別與聯(lián)系；第五章從立法方式、相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)市場(chǎng)支配地位濫用的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及制定知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)反壟斷執(zhí)法指南建議等方面對(duì)我國(guó)立法規(guī)制提出了完善建議。
[Abstract]:The legal system of intellectual property, which aims to improve the public interest of the whole society, has been interdependent with "monopoly" since its birth. In the market economy, the intellectual property rights protection and the anti-monopoly law both have the consistency on the goal and the conflict of the implementation process. Intellectual property rights have a certain monopoly, it can bring economic benefits to the right holders according to the law, but also has the risk of abuse by the right holders, and this abuse often makes the right holders to compete and exclude in the market. Limit competition and gain monopoly benefits. With the continuous deepening of reform and opening up, many foreign enterprises take advantage of the imperfect legal environment of intellectual property rights in our country, through improper means such as tying up, refusing permission, price discrimination, ultra-high pricing and so on, through their dominant position in the market. Restricting the transferee and the third party in the fields of technology license and technology transfer has only competitive position, which seriously endangers the development and upgrading of our national industry, and at the same time damages the vital interests of the market relative to the main consumers. However, the Anti-monopoly Law was issued relatively late, the provisions for intellectual property are only the 55th, very few. Although the guide of anti-monopoly law enforcement related to intellectual property has been studied to the fifth draft, but the time of its formal release is not clear. In this paper, the author analyzes and defines the dominant position of the intellectual property market and related elements, as well as the research on how to carry out the content of anti-monopoly regulation. It is hoped that the law enforcement of China's anti-monopoly law on the dominant position of intellectual property market can be refined. By studying and drawing lessons from international legislation and judicial practice, some suggestions are put forward for the anti-monopoly regulation of the dominant position of China's intellectual property market. The first chapter introduces the relationship between intellectual property law and antimonopoly law, and the problems existing in the regulation of China's dominant position in the intellectual property market. The status quo of anti-monopoly law; The second chapter focuses on the formation of the dominant position of the intellectual property market and the definition of the dominant position of the intellectual property market, hoping that the introduction of these two aspects can lay a theoretical foundation for the analysis of this paper. This paper briefly introduces the legislation and practice of anti-monopoly regulation in the field of intellectual property rights in EU and Japan, and gives a reference to the regulation of anti-monopoly law on the dominant position of intellectual property market in China. The fourth chapter compares the dominant position of intellectual property market with the abuse of intellectual property rights, and clarifies the difference and relation between market dominant position and abuse of intellectual property rights. This paper puts forward some suggestions on the legislative regulation of our country from the aspects of identifying standards for abuse of dominant position in the intellectual property market and formulating guidelines for antimonopoly enforcement of intellectual property rights.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.4;D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王先林;;濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年07期

2 高靜;;試析知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制——從搭售的角度分析[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年29期

3 龍柯宇;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)壟斷性檢討[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年10期

4 鄭鵬程;美國(guó)反壟斷法“本身違法”與“合理法則”適用范圍探討[J];河北法學(xué);2005年10期

5 陳曉波,徐云國(guó),周亞夫,公丕祥;美國(guó)反壟斷法及其政策述評(píng)[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);1996年05期

6 宋河發(fā);;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)壟斷及其對(duì)我國(guó)技術(shù)引進(jìn)的影響[J];科技與法律;2006年01期

7 龍柯宇;;價(jià)格域?yàn)E用知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)市場(chǎng)支配地位的反壟斷研究[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)探討;2013年05期

8 王秀玲;;反壟斷法中的濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位制度研究[J];青海社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年01期

9 王東民;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)反壟斷法律規(guī)制中的市場(chǎng)支配力[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

10 劉源;;論我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域中的反壟斷法律制度[J];鄖陽(yáng)師范高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1813873