本文選題：公有領(lǐng)域 + 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法保護(hù)的不足�。� 參考：《沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：民間文藝是民族文化瑰寶，保護(hù)民間文藝就是維護(hù)文化多樣性。隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的不斷發(fā)展，民間文藝潛在的經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值也不斷被人們挖掘出來(lái)。為了保證民間文藝有序發(fā)展，保護(hù)保有人乃至國(guó)家的利益，保證民間文藝的源泉孜孜不倦地流淌，法律人士積極地對(duì)民間文藝的法律保護(hù)進(jìn)行探討。 筆者通過(guò)網(wǎng)絡(luò)資料、電視資料、各類文獻(xiàn)了解到了我國(guó)民間藝術(shù)的窘境，并且在查閱相關(guān)的法律法規(guī)時(shí)沒(méi)有發(fā)現(xiàn)特別有效的規(guī)制辦法，進(jìn)而閱讀大量保護(hù)民間文藝文獻(xiàn)的基礎(chǔ)上認(rèn)真思考總結(jié)，通過(guò)對(duì)幾位學(xué)者的學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析，得出了自己的一些不成熟的想法，希望對(duì)我國(guó)民間文藝的保護(hù)盡到微薄之力。 本篇文章論述了現(xiàn)行法律在保護(hù)民間文藝領(lǐng)域存在的不足，借鑒國(guó)際公約的相關(guān)規(guī)定服務(wù)于我國(guó)民間文藝的保護(hù)。民間文藝產(chǎn)生年代久遠(yuǎn)，并且被公眾熟知。由于一些原因造成了現(xiàn)行法律在對(duì)其保護(hù)中遇到了障礙，如果僅僅因?yàn)槟承╄Υ枚懦承┓捎绕涫侵R(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法保護(hù)，對(duì)民間文藝來(lái)說(shuō)顯然是不公平的。在文章中不僅探討了法律的各項(xiàng)不相適應(yīng)的地方，同時(shí)也認(rèn)真分析了應(yīng)該如何來(lái)彌補(bǔ)某些漏洞，以及一些有利的保護(hù)的措施，實(shí)現(xiàn)民間文藝的法律利益。 我認(rèn)為雖然國(guó)際社會(huì)上對(duì)民間文藝的保護(hù)已經(jīng)做出了不少的努力，有些方法也是值得我們借鑒的，比如CBD確立的三項(xiàng)基本原則、WIPO采取的不要求新穎性審查的權(quán)利申請(qǐng)程序。但就我國(guó)的具體情況而言，知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)在保護(hù)民間藝術(shù)上是可以發(fā)揮突出作用的。雖然會(huì)有些瑕疵，但是對(duì)待特別的事物時(shí)就需要變通，經(jīng)過(guò)變通的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)可以稱之為知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)項(xiàng)下的針對(duì)民間文藝的特殊權(quán)利保護(hù)。通過(guò)分析，我認(rèn)為民間文藝并沒(méi)有完全進(jìn)入公共領(lǐng)域，利用該項(xiàng)特殊權(quán)利保護(hù)時(shí)，，可以充分考慮數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)保護(hù)、在先權(quán)利保護(hù)、地理標(biāo)志保護(hù)、外觀設(shè)計(jì)保護(hù)、在先技術(shù)保護(hù)、商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)等措施。這些措施可以保證本群體正當(dāng)利益，建立利益共享機(jī)制，來(lái)保證我國(guó)民間文藝的正當(dāng)利用、健康有序的發(fā)展，避免形成一個(gè)群體的文化壟斷，推動(dòng)我國(guó)民間文藝的可持續(xù)發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Folk literature and art is the treasure of national culture, protecting folk literature and art is to maintain cultural diversity. With the development of economy, the potential economic value of folk literature and art has been excavated. In order to ensure the orderly development of folk literature and art, to protect the interests of people and even the country, and to ensure that the source of folk literature and art flows tirelessly, legal personages actively discuss the legal protection of folk literature and art. The author has learned about the dilemma of folk art in our country through network materials, television materials and various kinds of documents, and has not found any especially effective regulation methods when consulting relevant laws and regulations. On the basis of reading a large amount of literature to protect folk literature and art, we carefully consider and summarize, through the comparative analysis of the academic viewpoints of several scholars, we have come to some immature ideas of our own. I hope to do my best to protect the folk literature and art in our country. This article discusses the shortcomings of the existing laws in the field of protecting folk literature and art, and draws lessons from the relevant provisions of international conventions to serve the protection of folk literature and art in China. Folk literature and art produced for a long time, and is well-known to the public. Due to some reasons, the current law has encountered obstacles in its protection. It is obviously unfair to folk literature and art to exclude the protection of some laws, especially intellectual property law, just because of some defects. In this paper, we not only discuss the incompatibility of the law, but also analyze how to make up some loopholes, and some favorable measures to protect the folk literature and art in order to realize the legal interests of the folk literature and art. I think that although the international community has made a lot of efforts to protect folk literature and art, some methods are also worthy of our reference, such as the three basic principles established by CBD. But in our country, intellectual property right can play a prominent role in protecting folk art. Although there may be some flaws, it is necessary to adapt to special things. The modified intellectual property right can be called the special right protection of folk literature and art under intellectual property rights. Through analysis, I think that folk literature and art has not completely entered the public domain. When we use this special right protection, we can take full account of database protection, prior right protection, geographical indication protection, design protection, prior technology protection, Measures such as the protection of trade secrets. These measures can guarantee the legitimate interests of the group and establish a mechanism of benefit sharing to ensure the proper use of Chinese folk literature and art, healthy and orderly development, to avoid the formation of a group of cultural monopoly, and to promote the sustainable development of Chinese folk literature and art.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 薛達(dá)元;蔡蕾;;《生物多樣性公約》遺傳資源獲取和惠益分享國(guó)際制度談判進(jìn)展[J];環(huán)境保護(hù);2007年22期

2 朱雪忠;傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)的法律保護(hù)初探[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年03期

3 何揚(yáng)波;西部大開(kāi)發(fā)中看民族文化[J];今日民族;2002年06期

本文編號(hào)：1813819