本文選題：著作權(quán)延伸集體管理 + 著作權(quán)集體管理　； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：北歐五國的著作權(quán)立法首創(chuàng)延伸集體管理制度，該制度允許集體管理組織在特定情況下對非會(huì)員權(quán)利人的作品進(jìn)行管理。該制度在解決海量使用作品方面行之有效，在世界范圍內(nèi)引起了廣泛關(guān)注。為了解決作品大量授權(quán)的問題，北歐各國將著作權(quán)延伸性集體管理制度，作為強(qiáng)制許可和法定許可等非自愿許可的制度替代品，這與北歐社會(huì)的特定環(huán)境密切相關(guān)。 我國《著作權(quán)法》的第三次修改過程中，立法者試圖將著作權(quán)延伸管理制度移植到中國的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法律體系之中。但在國家版權(quán)局公布《著作權(quán)法(修改草案)》的第一稿時(shí)，其中的第60條和第70條就引發(fā)了音樂作品著作權(quán)人的極大關(guān)注和廣泛的討論。以音樂作品權(quán)利人為代表的著作權(quán)權(quán)利人將該制度視為壟斷機(jī)構(gòu)攫取利益的制度設(shè)計(jì)。一時(shí)間，對該制度批評不斷，所謂權(quán)利人利益“被代表”之聲四起。 著作權(quán)延伸集體管理制度本身實(shí)際是解決海量許可問題方面一個(gè)行之有效的方法。運(yùn)行良好的著作權(quán)延伸管理制度不論對于權(quán)利人還是使用者而言都是突破許可困境的有利的武器。但是也需要注意的是中國的社會(huì)文化背景與北歐不盡相同，但在也出現(xiàn)了實(shí)踐上的需求。特別在卡拉OK點(diǎn)唱領(lǐng)域內(nèi)尤為如此。 在我國著作權(quán)法規(guī)定了廣泛的法定許可且集體管理組織不夠完善的背景下，應(yīng)放棄寬泛的延伸性集體許可規(guī)則，，僅規(guī)定特定領(lǐng)域使用作品可適用延伸性集體許可制度。因此，立法者應(yīng)該鼓勵(lì)權(quán)利人和使用者之間的利益交換，以達(dá)成適用范圍上的共識(shí)。同時(shí)，須明確著作權(quán)延伸性集體許可的權(quán)利限制屬性，具體制度的構(gòu)建應(yīng)符合國際條約的基本精神。因此，在移植著作權(quán)延伸管理制度時(shí)，首先應(yīng)當(dāng)充分分析該制度，完整地移植，并考量不同的社會(huì)背景，避免南橘北枳。
[Abstract]:The copyright legislation of the five Nordic countries pioneered the extension of the collective management system, which allowed collective management organizations to manage the works of non-member rights holders under certain circumstances. The system is effective in solving the problem of mass use of works and has attracted worldwide attention. In order to solve the problem of a large number of authorizations, Nordic countries regard the extended collective management system of copyright as a substitute for involuntary licensing, such as compulsory licensing and legal licensing, which is closely related to the specific environment of Nordic society. In the process of the third revision of copyright Law in China, the legislator tried to transplant the extended copyright management system into the intellectual property legal system of China. However, when the National copyright Administration published the first draft of the copyright Law (revised draft), articles 60 and 70 of the draft caused great concern and extensive discussion by the copyright owners of music works. The copyright owners, represented by the right holders of musical works, regard the system as a system designed for monopolies to seize benefits. At one time, criticism of the system continued, so-called obligee interests "was represented." The collective management system of copyright extension itself is an effective method to solve the problem of massive licensing. A well-run copyright extension management system is a beneficial weapon for both the owner and the user to break through the licensing dilemma. However, we should pay attention to the fact that the social and cultural background of China is different from that of northern Europe, but there are also practical needs. This is especially true in the area of karaoke clicking. Under the background that the copyright law of our country has stipulated the extensive legal license and the collective management organization is not perfect, we should give up the broad extended collective license rule, and only stipulate that the extended collective license system can be applied to the use of the work in a specific field. Therefore, legislators should encourage the exchange of interests between the right holder and the user in order to reach a consensus on the scope of application. At the same time, it is necessary to clarify the limitation attribute of copyright extension collective license, and the construction of specific system should conform to the basic spirit of international treaties. Therefore, when transplanting the copyright extension management system, we should analyze the system fully, transplant it completely, and consider different social backgrounds to avoid the orange and northern trifoliate trifoliate orange.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 羅桂蕓;魯春梅;;數(shù)字環(huán)境下版權(quán)保護(hù)制度構(gòu)建的思考[J];北京印刷學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

2 葉新;國外著作權(quán)集體管理組織概況[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2005年06期

3 毛牧然,周實(shí);論著作權(quán)集體管理制度[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年05期

4 湛益祥;論著作權(quán)集體管理[J];法學(xué);2001年09期

5 何昆;陳文君;;著作權(quán)集體管理爭議問題新議[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年04期

6 孫冠緋;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下我國著作權(quán)集體管理延伸探析[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年07期

7 陳敦;李莉;;延伸性集體管理制度在我國著作權(quán)領(lǐng)域中的適用[J];濱州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年04期

8 馬繼超;;音樂著作權(quán)集體管理制度相關(guān)問題之探討[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年09期

9 王琴;曾若溪;;淺析我國延伸性集體管理[J];商業(yè)文化(上半月);2012年04期

10 李正華;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境中的著作權(quán)集體管理制度研究[J];信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全;2006年03期

本文編號(hào)：1804556