發(fā)布時間：2018-04-23 14:05

  本文選題：商業(yè)秘密 + 訴前禁令�。� 參考：《首都經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：訴前禁令被稱為“商業(yè)秘密的血液”，是訴訟法律制度中的一項制度，商業(yè)秘密訴前禁令①則是訴前禁令制度在商業(yè)秘密領(lǐng)域中的適用。禁令制度是權(quán)利人在普通法的損害賠償無法充分得到補償?shù)那闆r下，產(chǎn)生的一種依據(jù)衡平法來實現(xiàn)利益的救濟制度。訴前禁令可以及時預(yù)防和制止侵權(quán)行為，避免權(quán)利人的損失的發(fā)生或進一步的擴大。由于商業(yè)秘密的秘密性及價值性使其具有“一旦喪失就永遠喪失”的特性，只有獲得訴前禁令救濟，權(quán)利人才能及時保住商業(yè)秘密，所以訴前禁令救濟對于商業(yè)秘密而言具有特別重大的意義。本文在借鑒國外法律及司法實踐的基礎(chǔ)上，提出若干完善我國商業(yè)秘密訴前禁令制度的建議。 全文分為引言、正文和結(jié)語三部分。正文分為五章。 第一章介紹了商業(yè)秘密訴前禁令的概念、特點、淵源、意義及與我國其他民事保全程序的區(qū)別。首先回顧了禁令的歷史淵源及商業(yè)秘密禁令救濟的發(fā)展；其次，分析了商業(yè)秘密訴前禁令的概念、特點及存在的獨特價值；最后，在比較商業(yè)秘密訴前禁令與民事訴訟法上類似制度即訴前財產(chǎn)保全、先予執(zhí)行及《民法通則》中的停止侵權(quán)制度的區(qū)別后，分析了商業(yè)秘密訴前禁令的性質(zhì)。 第二章介紹了主要國家的訴前禁令制度的概況及我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法中關(guān)于訴前禁令的現(xiàn)狀。首先介紹了英美法系的代表的英國和美國的訴前禁令制度以及大陸法系國家的相關(guān)制度；其次，詳細介紹了TRIPS協(xié)議中的第五十條關(guān)于臨時措施的規(guī)定，這也是國際上保護知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的一大進步；最后，介紹了我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法中訴前禁令的規(guī)定，從而分析了商業(yè)秘密領(lǐng)域中引入訴前禁令的必要性。 第三章，具體分析了商業(yè)秘密訴前禁令適用的四個實質(zhì)條件，即情勢緊迫性——侵權(quán)已經(jīng)存在或即將發(fā)生；不可彌補的損害；提供了有效的擔(dān)保及利益的權(quán)衡。 第四章，介紹了商業(yè)秘密訴前禁令的擔(dān)保問題。首先分析了適用商業(yè)秘密訴前禁令需要提供擔(dān)保的必要性，接著針對擔(dān)保的實際問題即擔(dān)保的方式，擔(dān)保數(shù)額的確定及反擔(dān)保問題做了詳細分析。 第五章，從商業(yè)秘密訴前禁令與程序公正的關(guān)系的角度出發(fā)，分析了訴前禁令與程序公平的幾個原則之間的關(guān)系及沖突，接著提出解決兩者之間沖突的方法，，即設(shè)立聽證程序及復(fù)議程序。
[Abstract]:Pre-lawsuit injunction is called "the blood of trade secret", which is a system in the legal system of litigation, and the injunction of pre-lawsuit of trade secret is the application of the injunction system in the field of trade secret. The injunction system is a relief system in which the obligee can not get full compensation for damages under the common law and realizes the benefits according to the equity law. Pre-litigation injunction can prevent and stop the infringement in time and avoid the loss of the obligee. Because of the secrecy and value of trade secret, it has the characteristic of "losing it forever". Only by obtaining the relief of pre-lawsuit injunction, can the obligee keep the trade secret in time. Therefore, pre-lawsuit injunctive relief is of great significance to trade secrets. On the basis of drawing lessons from foreign law and judicial practice, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the injunction system of pre-lawsuit of trade secret in our country. The full text is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into five chapters. The first chapter introduces the concept, characteristics, origin, significance and differences from other civil protection procedures. First of all, it reviews the historical origin of prohibition and the development of trade secret prohibition relief; secondly, it analyzes the concept, characteristics and unique value of trade secret injunction. After comparing the differences between the pre-lawsuit prohibition of trade secret and the similar system of civil procedure law namely property preservation prior execution and cessation of tort system in General principles of Civil Law the author analyzes the nature of the prohibition on trade secret before litigation. The second chapter introduces the general situation of the injunction system in the main countries and the current situation of the injunction in the intellectual property law of our country. Firstly, it introduces the pre-litigation injunction system of the United Kingdom and the United States, which is the representative of Anglo-American law system, as well as the relevant systems of the continental law system countries. Secondly, it introduces the provisions of Article 50 of the TRIPS Agreement on interim measures in detail. This is also a great progress in the international protection of intellectual property rights. Finally, the article introduces the provisions of pre-lawsuit prohibition in intellectual property law of our country, and analyzes the necessity of introducing pre-suit injunction in the field of trade secrets. The third chapter analyzes the four essential conditions for the application of the pre-lawsuit injunction of trade secret, namely, the urgency of the situation, the existence or imminent occurrence of tort, irreparable damage, and the effective guarantee and balance of interests. The fourth chapter introduces the guarantee of pre-lawsuit prohibition of trade secret. This paper first analyzes the necessity of the application of the pre-suit injunction of trade secrets to provide security, and then makes a detailed analysis of the actual problem of security, namely, the way of security, the determination of the amount of security and the problem of counter-guarantee. In the fifth chapter, from the angle of the relationship between the injunction of trade secret and the procedural justice, the author analyzes the relationship and conflict between the injunction and the procedural fairness, and then puts forward the methods to resolve the conflict between the two. The procedure of hearing and reconsideration shall be established.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：首都經(jīng)濟貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 范華瑤;論民事訴訟行為保全的具體適用[D];河南大學(xué);2015年

2 侯玉坤;論專利侵權(quán)訴訟訴前禁令的適用及其完善[D];蘭州大學(xué);2015年

3 王攀銘;商業(yè)秘密訴前行為保全標準研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

本文編號：1792281