本文選題：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)警告 + 權(quán)利濫用��； 參考：《浙江大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)警告是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利人對(duì)涉嫌侵犯其知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的侵權(quán)嫌疑人及相關(guān)第三方發(fā)出的一種警告通知。雖然權(quán)利人發(fā)送侵權(quán)警告是一種通過(guò)私力救濟(jì)的方式行使知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán),但權(quán)利的行使應(yīng)當(dāng)規(guī)范在合理的范圍之內(nèi)。權(quán)利人行使權(quán)利要符合民法上的"誠(chéng)實(shí)信用"原則和"禁止權(quán)利濫用"的原則,并善盡注意義務(wù)。否則,濫發(fā)侵權(quán)警告的行為將會(huì)構(gòu)成權(quán)利的濫用。實(shí)踐中,警告發(fā)送方在行使其權(quán)利時(shí)超出了法律所允許的正當(dāng)邊界,對(duì)被警告方正常的商業(yè)關(guān)系產(chǎn)生影響,損害他人經(jīng)濟(jì)利益。從而引發(fā)被警告方提起確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)訴訟,乃至不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)訴訟的情形。通過(guò)對(duì)法律構(gòu)成要件的分析,濫發(fā)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)警告的行為可以構(gòu)成《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》上"詆毀商譽(yù)"和"虛假宣傳"行為。但兩者的法律構(gòu)成要件都較為苛刻。故而在保護(hù)被警告方合法權(quán)益和維護(hù)市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)秩序的視角下,法院在裁判過(guò)程中也可以依據(jù)《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》第二條的規(guī)定,對(duì)警告發(fā)送方的不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為進(jìn)行規(guī)制。而判斷構(gòu)成不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為與否,關(guān)鍵在于審視警告發(fā)送方在行使權(quán)利過(guò)程中是否善盡審慎注意義務(wù)。
[Abstract]:Intellectual property infringement warning is a warning notice issued by the owner of intellectual property to suspected infringers of intellectual property rights and related third parties. Although tortious warning issued by the obligee is a way to exercise intellectual property rights through private relief, the exercise of rights should be regulated within a reasonable scope. The right holder should comply with the principle of "good faith" and "prohibition of abuse of rights" in civil law and pay attention to it. Otherwise, the abuse of tort warnings will constitute an abuse of rights. In practice, the senders of warnings in the exercise of their rights beyond the legitimate border allowed by the law, to the warned party's normal business relations, damage to the economic interests of others. Thus, the warned party to initiate non-infringement litigation, and even unfair competition proceedings. Through the analysis of the constitutive elements of the law, the act of indiscriminately issuing warnings for infringement of intellectual property rights may constitute "defamation of goodwill" and "false propaganda" in Anti-unfair Competition Law. However, both of the legal elements are more harsh. Therefore, from the perspective of protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the warned party and maintaining the order of market competition, the court can also regulate the unfair competition behavior of the warning sender according to the provisions of Article 2 of the Anti-unfair Competition Law in the adjudication process. The key to judge whether it constitutes unfair competition or not is to examine whether the sender is willing to take care of his duty of care in the exercise of his right.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 劉維;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)警告函的正當(dāng)性邊界[J];比較法研究;2016年02期

2 王先林;;論反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法調(diào)整范圍的擴(kuò)展——我國(guó)《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》第2條的完善[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

3 鄭友德;伍春艷;;我國(guó)反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法修訂十問(wèn)[J];法學(xué);2009年01期

4 張廣良;;確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)之訴及其完善[J];人民司法;2008年11期

5 徐昕;;私力救濟(jì)的性質(zhì)[J];河北法學(xué);2007年07期

6 梁志文;論專利權(quán)人之侵權(quán)警告函[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2004年03期

7 吳漢東;試論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的“物上請(qǐng)求權(quán)”與侵權(quán)賠償請(qǐng)求權(quán)——兼論《知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)議》第45條規(guī)定之實(shí)質(zhì)精神[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2001年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1780520