本文選題：知識產(chǎn)權侵權警告 + 權利濫用��； 參考：《浙江大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：知識產(chǎn)權侵權警告是知識產(chǎn)權權利人對涉嫌侵犯其知識產(chǎn)權的侵權嫌疑人及相關第三方發(fā)出的一種警告通知。雖然權利人發(fā)送侵權警告是一種通過私力救濟的方式行使知識產(chǎn)權,但權利的行使應當規(guī)范在合理的范圍之內(nèi)。權利人行使權利要符合民法上的"誠實信用"原則和"禁止權利濫用"的原則,并善盡注意義務。否則,濫發(fā)侵權警告的行為將會構成權利的濫用。實踐中,警告發(fā)送方在行使其權利時超出了法律所允許的正當邊界,對被警告方正常的商業(yè)關系產(chǎn)生影響,損害他人經(jīng)濟利益。從而引發(fā)被警告方提起確認不侵權訴訟,乃至不正當競爭訴訟的情形。通過對法律構成要件的分析,濫發(fā)知識產(chǎn)權侵權警告的行為可以構成《反不正當競爭法》上"詆毀商譽"和"虛假宣傳"行為。但兩者的法律構成要件都較為苛刻。故而在保護被警告方合法權益和維護市場競爭秩序的視角下,法院在裁判過程中也可以依據(jù)《反不正當競爭法》第二條的規(guī)定,對警告發(fā)送方的不正當競爭行為進行規(guī)制。而判斷構成不正當競爭行為與否,關鍵在于審視警告發(fā)送方在行使權利過程中是否善盡審慎注意義務。
[Abstract]:Intellectual property infringement warning is a warning notice issued by the owner of intellectual property to suspected infringers of intellectual property rights and related third parties. Although tortious warning issued by the obligee is a way to exercise intellectual property rights through private relief, the exercise of rights should be regulated within a reasonable scope. The right holder should comply with the principle of "good faith" and "prohibition of abuse of rights" in civil law and pay attention to it. Otherwise, the abuse of tort warnings will constitute an abuse of rights. In practice, the senders of warnings in the exercise of their rights beyond the legitimate border allowed by the law, to the warned party's normal business relations, damage to the economic interests of others. Thus, the warned party to initiate non-infringement litigation, and even unfair competition proceedings. Through the analysis of the constitutive elements of the law, the act of indiscriminately issuing warnings for infringement of intellectual property rights may constitute "defamation of goodwill" and "false propaganda" in Anti-unfair Competition Law. However, both of the legal elements are more harsh. Therefore, from the perspective of protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the warned party and maintaining the order of market competition, the court can also regulate the unfair competition behavior of the warning sender according to the provisions of Article 2 of the Anti-unfair Competition Law in the adjudication process. The key to judge whether it constitutes unfair competition or not is to examine whether the sender is willing to take care of his duty of care in the exercise of his right.
【學位授予單位】：浙江大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.294

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 劉維;;知識產(chǎn)權侵權警告函的正當性邊界[J];比較法研究;2016年02期

2 王先林;;論反不正當競爭法調整范圍的擴展——我國《反不正當競爭法》第2條的完善[J];中國社會科學院研究生院學報;2010年06期

3 鄭友德;伍春艷;;我國反不正當競爭法修訂十問[J];法學;2009年01期

4 張廣良;;確認不侵權之訴及其完善[J];人民司法;2008年11期

5 徐昕;;私力救濟的性質[J];河北法學;2007年07期

6 梁志文;論專利權人之侵權警告函[J];知識產(chǎn)權;2004年03期

7 吳漢東;試論知識產(chǎn)權的“物上請求權”與侵權賠償請求權——兼論《知識產(chǎn)權協(xié)議》第45條規(guī)定之實質精神[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);2001年05期

，

本文編號：1780520