本文選題：專利許可　切入點：專利被許可人　出處：《西南政法大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為專利技術交易的主要形式之一，專利許可已經(jīng)逐漸成為實現(xiàn)專利商業(yè)化、產(chǎn)業(yè)化的重要方式。在專利許可中，一方面，專利權人將其獨占享有的專利實施權授予被許可人，自然有權利要求被許可人支付一定的對價，并就專利技術的實施設定相關的條件。另一方面，，專利被許可人在支付相應對價的情況下，同樣應當從專利許可中獲得合理收益，這種收益既取決于專利技術實施的效果，也取決于向?qū)＠麢嗳酥Ц兜脑S可對價和事先設定的許可條件。然而，在專利許可交易過程中，專利許可人并沒有尊重被許可人獲得合理收益的權利，反而利用其強勢地位，損害被許可人的利益。專利被許可人利益保護的缺失，不單會影響市場公平競爭，而且也會阻礙我國經(jīng)濟對外交往。為此，我國需改善專利被許可人的弱勢地位，進一步完善知識產(chǎn)權法和反壟斷法的相關規(guī)定，設立專利無效宣告中的提存條款，建立類似物權的專利被許可人保護和訴權約定制度。 論文主要運用了比較研究的方法，通過對部分國家、地區(qū)的法律制度進行比較，結合實證分析的方法，試圖把專利被許可人置于個人利益、社會公共利益的兩端來衡量權利保護。論文分五個部分，引言部分簡要概述了專利實施許可在專利商業(yè)化、產(chǎn)業(yè)化過程中的重要作用。談到專利被許可人在專利技術交易中的劣勢及對被許可利益保護的意義。第一部分，通過將專利實施許可與其他知識產(chǎn)權許可比較，突顯出專利實施許可合同的特點，并對專利許可合同條款進行了重點闡釋，引出專利許可合同的契約自由與限制。從專利許可的理論基礎著手，根據(jù)專利的原則及利益平衡理論指明專利被許可人利益保護的方向。第二部分，重點關注專利被許可人的地位。說明了保護專利被許可人的必要性，特別是基于我國國情，急需加強專利被許可人權利保護。結合專利被許可人的實證分析，指出了專利技術交易中對專利被許可人權利的具體影響。第三部分綜述了美國、日本、歐盟和臺灣地區(qū)對專利被許可人的相關規(guī)定，并在立法模式和認定標準等方面進行了比較分析。第四部分從我國現(xiàn)行國內(nèi)法分析，提出了對完善專利被許可人權利保護的思考，建議我國進一步完善知識產(chǎn)權法和反壟斷法的相關規(guī)定，設立專利無效宣告中的提存條款，建立類似物權的專利被許可人保護制度。
[Abstract]:As one of the main forms of patent technology transaction, patent license has gradually become an important way to realize the commercialization and industrialization of patent.In the patent license, on the one hand, the patentee grants the licensee the exclusive right to execute the patent, and naturally has the right to ask the licensee to pay a certain amount of consideration, and to set the relevant conditions for the implementation of the patent technology.On the other hand, if the licensee pays the corresponding consideration, he should also obtain a reasonable profit from the patent license, which depends on the effect of the implementation of the patent technology,It also depends on the consideration paid to the patentee and the pre-set conditions of the licence.However, in the course of patent licensing transaction, the patent licensor does not respect the licensee's right to obtain reasonable income. Instead, he takes advantage of his strong position to harm the licensee's interests.The lack of protection of patent licensee's interests will not only affect the fair competition of the market, but also hinder China's economic exchanges with foreign countries.Therefore, China needs to improve the weak position of patent licensees, further improve the relevant provisions of intellectual property law and anti-monopoly law, and set up the deposit clause in the invalidation of patent.Establish the patent licensee protection and litigation agreement system similar to real right.By comparing the legal systems of some countries and regions and combining the method of empirical analysis, the thesis tries to put the patent licensee in the personal interest.The protection of rights is measured at both ends of the public interest.The paper is divided into five parts. The introduction briefly summarizes the important role of patent license in the process of patent commercialization and industrialization.Discusses the patent licensee's disadvantage in the patent technology transaction and the significance to the license interest protection.In the first part, by comparing the patent license with other intellectual property licenses, it highlights the characteristics of the patent license contract, explains the terms of the patent license contract, and leads to the freedom and limitation of the patent license contract.Starting from the theoretical basis of patent licensing, this paper points out the direction of protecting the interests of patent licensees according to the principle of patent and the theory of balance of interests.The second part focuses on the status of patent licensees.It explains the necessity of protecting patent licensees, especially on the basis of our country's national conditions, so it is urgent to strengthen the protection of patent licensees' rights.Based on the empirical analysis of patent licensees, this paper points out the specific influence of patent technology transaction on the rights of patent licensees.The third part summarizes the relevant regulations of patent licensees in the United States, Japan, EU and Taiwan, and makes a comparative analysis on the legislative model and the standards of the patent licensees.The fourth part analyzes the current domestic law of our country, puts forward some thoughts on perfecting the protection of the rights of patent licensees, and suggests that our country should further perfect the relevant provisions of intellectual property law and anti-monopoly law, and set up the deposit clause in the invalidation of patent.Establish a patent licensee protection system similar to real right.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923.42

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 王宏芹;;專利被許可人的起訴權初探[J];安徽教育學院學報;2006年05期

2 周敏;李玉潔;易波;;論專利實施許可下被許可人的訴訟資格[J];昌吉學院學報;2006年02期

3 尹田;論物權與知識產(chǎn)權的關系[J];法商研究;2002年05期

4 胡昂;;Lear案之后的法律思考[J];法制與社會;2013年14期

5 梁祺;;專利許可企業(yè)破產(chǎn)時完善專利許可制度研究[J];科技管理研究;2010年10期

6 孟雁北;拒絕交易權的限制問題研究[J];廣東商學院學報;2005年01期

7 張耕;試論知識產(chǎn)權被許可人的訴訟地位[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟;2005年04期

本文編號：1704391