本文選題：知識產(chǎn)權(quán)　切入點：刑法　出處：《南昌大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：用刑法手段保護知識產(chǎn)權(quán)是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的普遍作法，我國亦不例外。我國目前的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事立法無論是犯罪圈之大，還是課刑的嚴厲程度，都已經(jīng)達到世界“領(lǐng)先”水平，立法者試圖以此種手段打擊當時所面臨的嚴重的侵犯知識產(chǎn)權(quán)現(xiàn)象，同時為中國加入WTO提供良好的法律環(huán)境和中國保護知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的良好國際形象。經(jīng)歷十幾年知識產(chǎn)權(quán)立法、執(zhí)法、司法的完善，中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護狀況已經(jīng)得到了明顯改善，嚴重的大規(guī)模侵犯知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的現(xiàn)象很少發(fā)生。伴隨著中國法制理念的更新和世界范圍內(nèi)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的輕刑化趨勢，從刑法謙抑性精神出發(fā)，尊重知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的私權(quán)屬性，減少國家對于私權(quán)的主動干預(yù)，從我國國情考慮，設(shè)定科學(xué)合理的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護目標，慎用刑法介入知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護范圍，在刑事制度上盡量以慎刑、輕刑、非自由刑為知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事立法的指導(dǎo)思想，有必要考慮我國現(xiàn)行刑法規(guī)定的罪名存在的價值及合理性，從立法的角度調(diào)整權(quán)利保護與社會公眾利益的平衡關(guān)系。同時，對于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪案件的刑事程序提起、刑事證據(jù)的運用等均應(yīng)當重新檢討與完善，，保障審判的準確和程序的科學(xué)合理。不應(yīng)當一味強調(diào)以擴大打擊面、嚴刑的手段保護知識產(chǎn)權(quán)，尤其在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)刑事立法和司法時要避免陷入國際化等錯誤的指導(dǎo)思路中。
[Abstract]:The protection of intellectual property by means of criminal law is a common practice in intellectual property system, and China is no exception.The current criminal legislation on intellectual property in our country, regardless of the crime circle or the severity of the punishment, has reached the "leading level" in the world. Legislators tried to crack down on the serious intellectual property infringement phenomenon that they faced at that time.At the same time for China to join the WTO to provide a good legal environment and China to protect intellectual property rights a good international image.After more than ten years of intellectual property legislation, law enforcement, judicial perfection, China's intellectual property protection situation has been significantly improved, serious large-scale violations of intellectual property rights rarely occur.With the renewal of China's legal system concept and the tendency of light punishment of intellectual property rights in the world, from the view of the modesty spirit of criminal law, respecting the private rights attribute of intellectual property rights and reducing the state's active interference in private rights, we should consider the situation of our country.Setting a scientific and reasonable goal of intellectual property protection, carefully using criminal law to intervene in the scope of protection of intellectual property, and trying to use careful punishment, light punishment and non-free punishment as the guiding ideology of criminal legislation of intellectual property rights in the criminal system.It is necessary to consider the value and rationality of the existing charges under the current criminal law of our country, and adjust the balance between the protection of rights and the public interests from the angle of legislation.At the same time, the criminal procedure and the use of criminal evidence should be reviewed and perfected to ensure the accuracy of the trial and the scientific and reasonable procedure.We should not blindly emphasize the protection of intellectual property rights by means of expanding the scope of attack and severely punishing intellectual property, especially in the criminal legislation and judicature of intellectual property rights, to avoid falling into the wrong guiding ideas such as internationalization.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3;D923.42

【共引文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳亞娥;;玩忽職守罪構(gòu)成論[J];安康學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年06期

2 白昌晶;;貪污罪相關(guān)問題研究[J];才智;2010年01期

3 段麗;;圖形——刑法學(xué)“點”與“線”的創(chuàng)新表現(xiàn)[J];長春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報;2012年01期

4 周青;王俊;;法文化視域下“婚內(nèi)強奸”行為的罪與罰[J];創(chuàng)新;2009年06期

5 岳益民;;中外毒品犯罪的刑事立法比較[J];常州工學(xué)院學(xué)報(社科版);2006年06期

6 竇慶蘭;;《劊子手之歌》中“劊子手”的雙重含義解讀[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年04期

7 王志遠;;多元身份主體共同犯罪之定性難題及前提性批判[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2010年02期

8 薛進展;閆艷;謝杰;;商業(yè)賄賂犯罪司法認定若干疑難問題研究[J];福建法學(xué);2009年04期

9 沈東林;閆艷;;商業(yè)賄賂犯罪刑法適用疑難問題探析[J];福建警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年04期

10 黃明儒;孫s

本文編號：1702248