本文選題：行為保全　切入點(diǎn)：勝訴可能性　出處：《華南理工大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：民事訴訟作為人們解決民事糾紛的重要手段，具有權(quán)威性、強(qiáng)制性、終局性等優(yōu)點(diǎn)。但是隨著民事訴訟手段的廣泛應(yīng)用，民事訴訟“滯后性”的缺點(diǎn)也逐漸凸顯。為了彌補(bǔ)民事訴訟的“滯后性”缺點(diǎn)，大多數(shù)國家都在民事訴訟法律中規(guī)定了保全制度，以滿足在緊急情況下當(dāng)事人的權(quán)利保護(hù)需求。保全制度由財(cái)產(chǎn)保全制度和行為保全制度共同組成。財(cái)產(chǎn)保全制度在我國民事訴訟法中已存在多年，但行為保全制度卻遲遲未得到我國民事訴訟法的確認(rèn)。雖然在我國的海事訴訟法和知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法領(lǐng)域，均已出現(xiàn)具有行為保全性質(zhì)的禁令制度，但實(shí)踐中仍存在大量的行為保全案件無法處理。終于在2012年我國民事訴訟法進(jìn)行了新的修改，將行為保全制度納入我國民事訴訟的范圍。 但是，與此同時我們也發(fā)現(xiàn)，新民事訴訟法對行為保全的規(guī)定非常簡單，對行為保全制度適用中可能出現(xiàn)的眾多細(xì)節(jié)問題并未涉及，相關(guān)司法解釋也尚未出臺。相比其他國家，我國的行為保全制度仍有較大的改進(jìn)空間。特別是申請行為保全的條件，作為行為保全制度的核心問題，其完善與否與行為保全制度的整體適用息息相關(guān)。遺憾的是，我國新民事訴訟法對于申請行為保全的條件，規(guī)定也十分簡略，仍存在不小的完善空間。基于此，，本文希望通過研究，發(fā)現(xiàn)新民事訴訟法對申請行為保全條件規(guī)定中存在的漏洞與不足，分析其在適用中可能面臨的問題，并嘗試提出一些解決建議。本文分為五個部分：第一部分首先對我國申請行為保全的條件進(jìn)行制度考察。第二部分則是探討行為保全條件設(shè)定的邏輯出發(fā)點(diǎn)。從第三部分開始，逐章分析我國行為保全的每一個申請條件，探討行為保全申請條件中的爭議問題以及關(guān)鍵點(diǎn)，先研究行為保全的前提條件，再分析行為保全的必要條件，最后探討行為保全的擔(dān)保條件。本文通過對申請行為保全的條件進(jìn)行全面分析，希望對我國日后完善申請行為保全的條件提供一些有利的參考。
[Abstract]:As an important means to solve civil disputes, civil litigation has the advantages of authority, compulsion and finality.However, with the wide application of civil litigation means, the shortcomings of "lag" in civil litigation have been gradually highlighted.In order to make up for the "lag" of the civil action, most countries have stipulated the preservation system in the civil litigation law to meet the needs of the protection of the rights of the parties in the emergency situation.Preservation system consists of property preservation system and act preservation system.Property preservation system has existed in our civil procedure law for many years, but the behavior preservation system has not been confirmed by our civil procedure law.Although in the field of maritime procedural law and intellectual property law of our country, there has been a prohibition system with the nature of act preservation, but in practice there are still a large number of cases of act preservation that cannot be dealt with.Finally, in 2012, China's civil procedure law was revised to bring the act preservation system into the scope of our civil action.However, at the same time, we also find that the provisions of the new civil procedure law on the preservation of conduct is very simple, and many details that may arise in the application of the act preservation system have not been involved, and the relevant judicial interpretation has not yet been issued.Compared with other countries, there is still much room for improvement in our country's behavior preservation system.Especially, as the core issue of the behavior preservation system, the condition of application for act preservation is closely related to the whole application of the act preservation system.Unfortunately, the new civil procedure law has a very simple stipulation on the condition of the preservation of the application act, and there is still no small room for improvement.Based on this, this paper hopes to find out the loopholes and deficiencies in the provisions of the new civil procedure law on the preservation conditions of application, analyze the problems it may face in its application, and try to put forward some suggestions to solve the problems.This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is to investigate the condition of the preservation of the application act in our country.The second part is to explore the logical starting point of behavior preservation conditions.Beginning from the third part, chapter by chapter analyzes every application condition of behavior preservation in our country, discusses the dispute problem and key point in the condition of behavior preservation application, studies the premise condition of act preservation first, and then analyzes the necessary condition of act preservation.Finally, the article discusses the guarantee conditions of act preservation.Through the comprehensive analysis of the condition of the preservation of the application act, this paper hopes to provide some beneficial reference for our country to perfect the condition of the preservation of the application act in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳瑩;;我國行為保全制度的建構(gòu)[J];廈門大學(xué)法律評論;2006年01期

2 陳瑩;我國民事訴訟行為保全制度初探[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

3 肖建國;論訴前停止侵權(quán)行為的法律性質(zhì)——以訴前停止侵犯知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行為為中心的研究[J];法商研究;2002年04期

4 范躍如;;試論我國行為保全制度及其構(gòu)建與完善[J];法學(xué)家;2004年05期

5 鄭本香;;民事訴訟行為保全制度的細(xì)節(jié)化探究——以新民事訴訟法實(shí)施為契機(jī)[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年05期

6 李瀾;美國禁令制度研究——兼評我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)訴訟中臨時禁令制度[J];科技與法律;2003年02期

7 郭小冬;;從perfect 10v. Google案看臨時禁令申請中的利益衡量——兼評我國《民事訴訟法修正案》第21條之規(guī)定[J];河北法學(xué);2013年08期

8 金正佳,翁子明;論建立行為保全制度[J];人民司法;1997年01期

9 劉金華;論訴訟公正與效率[J];山西省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

10 趙沛沛;;淺析民事訴訟中行為保全的若干問題[J];山西省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 范毅強(qiáng);民事保全程序要論[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

本文編號：1698261