本文選題：現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯　切入點(diǎn)：侵權(quán)　出處：《中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度的完善，知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的糾紛案件進(jìn)一步增多。2008年專利法第62條中首次以法律的形式引入了現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯制度，這是專利法最大的變化之一�，F(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯是一項(xiàng)抗辯制度，理解為：如被控侵權(quán)技術(shù)屬于涉案專利申請(qǐng)的現(xiàn)有技術(shù)，被控侵權(quán)技術(shù)則不構(gòu)成侵犯專利權(quán)。 眾所周知，我國(guó)專利法修正案已于2009年10月1日實(shí)施，現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯制度應(yīng)當(dāng)與之配套，配合新專利法的實(shí)行。另外，隨著專利法修正案確定了現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯制度的法律地位，現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯制度在我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中將獲得更為廣泛地適用。然而，我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中普遍存在的對(duì)于現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯制度的誤讀，為了防止人民政府管理專利工作的部門查處專利侵權(quán)糾紛時(shí)出現(xiàn)同樣的誤讀，為了減少人民法院司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)于現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯制度的錯(cuò)誤理解，有必要對(duì)于現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯制度加以規(guī)范，并使得上述規(guī)范能夠和專利法修正案同步得到實(shí)施。 本文從現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯的法理研究出發(fā)，研究了現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯制度的內(nèi)涵、來(lái)源、與其他相關(guān)制度的關(guān)系以及現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯的價(jià)值分析；然后說(shuō)明了現(xiàn)在司法實(shí)踐存在的一些問(wèn)題，現(xiàn)有技術(shù)范圍，比較方式，成立的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)等進(jìn)行研究；再次研究了現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯制度與無(wú)效制度的一些關(guān)系以及現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯制度濫用的危害；最后對(duì)現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯制度的完善提出一些建議，，特別是與無(wú)效制度的協(xié)調(diào)以及在專利審查中的一些建議。 希望通過(guò)本文司法實(shí)踐和專利審查提供依據(jù)或者參考，便于實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)于專利侵權(quán)的司法裁判與行政處理的協(xié)調(diào)和統(tǒng)一。
[Abstract]:With the improvement of China's intellectual property system, the number of intellectual property disputes has increased further. Article 62 of the 2008 Patent Law introduced the existing technology defense system in the form of law for the first time. This is one of the biggest changes in patent law. The existing technology defense is a defense system, which is understood as: if the alleged infringing technology belongs to the existing technology of the patent application involved, the alleged infringing technology does not constitute an infringement of the patent right. As we all know, the patent law amendment of our country was implemented on October 1, 2009, and the existing technology defense system should be matched with the implementation of the new patent law. In addition, With the patent law amendment confirming the legal status of the existing technology defense system, the existing technology defense system will be applied more widely in the judicial practice of our country. In order to prevent the misreading of the existing technology defense system in judicial practice in our country, in order to prevent the same misreading occurring in the investigation and handling of patent infringement disputes by the departments administering patent work of the people's governments, In order to reduce the misunderstandings of the existing technology defense system in the judicial practice of the people's court, it is necessary to standardize the existing technology defense system, and to make the above norms be implemented simultaneously with the patent law amendment. This paper studies the connotation, source, relationship with other related systems and the value analysis of the existing technology defense system from the legal theory research of the existing technology defense. Then it explains some problems existing in the current judicial practice, the existing technical scope, comparative methods, established standards and so on. The relationship between the existing technology defense system and the invalid system and the harm of the abuse of the existing technology defense system are studied again. Finally, some suggestions on the perfection of the existing technology defense system are put forward. In particular, coordination with the invalid system and some recommendations in the patent review. It is hoped that the judicial practice and patent examination in this paper can provide basis or reference for the coordination and unification of judicial adjudication and administrative treatment of patent infringement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.4

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李昌青;現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯制度研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2014年

2 章上曉;現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯在專利侵權(quán)訴訟中的適用研究[D];煙臺(tái)大學(xué);2014年

本文編號(hào)：1664638