本文選題：文化企業(yè)　切入點(diǎn)：上市融資　出處：《西北大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：丈化產(chǎn)業(yè)作為一種特殊的經(jīng)濟(jì)形態(tài)和意識(shí)形態(tài),是許多國(guó)家提升為國(guó)家戰(zhàn)略高度的提升產(chǎn)業(yè)。聯(lián)合國(guó)教科文組織按照工業(yè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),將文化產(chǎn)業(yè)界定為“生產(chǎn)、再生產(chǎn)、儲(chǔ)存以及分配文化產(chǎn)品和服務(wù)的一系列活動(dòng)”。我國(guó)不僅把推動(dòng)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展上升到國(guó)家戰(zhàn)略層面,而且確立為國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)支柱性產(chǎn)業(yè)。 本文以文化產(chǎn)業(yè)直接融資中的法律問(wèn)題為研究對(duì)象,以文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展中涉及到的直接融資現(xiàn)狀為切入點(diǎn),剖析其中主要存在的法律問(wèn)題,結(jié)合目前我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀和國(guó)外先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn),從而提出相應(yīng)的建議。 首先交代選題的背景、提出問(wèn)題我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的不成熟性,文化產(chǎn)業(yè)在融資中有很多問(wèn)題,如融資難、上市門檻高、文化產(chǎn)業(yè)上市重組等問(wèn)題都要得以解決。因此,本文主要就“文化產(chǎn)業(yè)上市融資法律問(wèn)題”展開(kāi)研究,并在對(duì)比國(guó)外情況的基礎(chǔ)上,提出解決我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)上市融資法律對(duì)策,包括拓寬融資渠道,鼓勵(lì)有條件的文化企業(yè)通過(guò)資本市場(chǎng)直接融資等。然后分析了我國(guó)文化企業(yè)上市融資的現(xiàn)狀與問(wèn)題。在我國(guó)文化企業(yè)上市融資的現(xiàn)狀中,分別分析研究了我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)上市股權(quán)融資現(xiàn)狀和債券融資現(xiàn)狀,同時(shí)借鑒分析了華誼兄弟、光線傳媒的上市之路,從而發(fā)現(xiàn)了各種法律問(wèn)題,如文化企業(yè)境內(nèi)上市融資規(guī)模過(guò)小,文化企業(yè)股權(quán)融資、債券融資的門檻過(guò)高,投資者對(duì)文化企業(yè)上市融資的認(rèn)同感低的問(wèn)題,最后提出了完善文化企業(yè)上市融資的政策與法律建議。從政策層面推動(dòng)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整與產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)；多渠道解決文化產(chǎn)業(yè)上市融資的法律問(wèn)題；完善版權(quán)等知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)第三方評(píng)估法律制度；完善與文化企業(yè)發(fā)展相關(guān)的版權(quán)等法律制度。 本文通過(guò)文獻(xiàn)研究方法、比較研究方法、案例研究方法來(lái)逐個(gè)闡述論證我國(guó)文化企業(yè)上市融資的問(wèn)題與解決的辦法。
[Abstract]:As a special economic form and ideology, Zhanhua industry is promoted by many countries to a high level of national strategy. According to the industrial standards, UNESCO defines cultural industry as "production and reproduction." "A series of activities to store and distribute cultural products and services". China not only promotes the development of cultural industry to the national strategic level, but also establishes itself as a pillar industry of the national economy. This paper takes the legal problems in the direct financing of cultural industry as the research object, taking the current situation of direct financing involved in the development of the cultural industry as the starting point, and analyzes the main legal problems existing therein. Combined with the current situation of cultural industry development in China and the advanced experience of foreign countries, the corresponding suggestions are put forward. First of all, I will explain the background of the selected topic and raise the question of the immaturity of the cultural industry in our country. There are many problems in the financing of the cultural industry, such as the difficulty of financing, the high threshold of listing, the restructuring of the cultural industry, and so on. Therefore, This paper mainly studies on the legal problems of listed financing of cultural industry, and on the basis of comparing the situation of foreign countries, puts forward the legal countermeasures to solve the listing financing of cultural industry in our country, including widening the financing channels. This paper encourages the conditional cultural enterprises to raise funds directly through the capital market, and then analyzes the present situation and problems of the listing and financing of the cultural enterprises in our country. In the present situation of the listing and financing of the cultural enterprises in our country, This paper analyzes and studies the status quo of stock financing and bond financing of Chinese cultural industry respectively, and at the same time analyzes the listing of Huayi Brothers and Ray Media, and finds out all kinds of legal problems. For example, the scale of domestic listing and financing of cultural enterprises is too small, the equity financing of cultural enterprises and the threshold of bond financing are too high, and investors have low recognition of the listing and financing of cultural enterprises. Finally, the paper puts forward the policy and legal suggestions to perfect the listing financing of cultural enterprises, promotes the structural adjustment and upgrading of cultural industry from the policy level, and solves the legal problems of listing financing of cultural industries through multiple channels. Improve the third-party evaluation of intellectual property rights such as copyright legal system; improve the development of cultural enterprises related to copyright and other legal systems. Through the methods of literature research, comparative study and case study, this paper expounds the problems and solutions of listing financing of Chinese cultural enterprises one by one.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91;D922.287

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宋麗;;華誼兄弟的融資夢(mèng)[J];世界博覽;2009年22期

2 呂慶華;;文化資源產(chǎn)業(yè)開(kāi)發(fā)的若干問(wèn)題[J];商業(yè)研究;2006年12期

3 文杰;;我國(guó)版權(quán)登記制度的現(xiàn)狀、問(wèn)題與完善——從版權(quán)“一女多嫁”談起[J];出版發(fā)行研究;2011年05期

4 王海英;;文化創(chuàng)意產(chǎn)業(yè)版權(quán)融資相關(guān)法律問(wèn)題探析[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年08期

5 劉俊;;整體上市板塊將再起風(fēng)云[J];股市動(dòng)態(tài)分析;2007年33期

6 高升;;加快發(fā)展文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的政策思考[J];黨建;2010年12期

7 林麗;;我國(guó)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展中的投融資問(wèn)題及對(duì)策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;2012年04期

8 修國(guó)義;榮榮;;民營(yíng)企業(yè)的紅籌之路——上市前重組及上市地點(diǎn)選擇問(wèn)題[J];科技與管理;2008年06期

9 張輝鋒;宋穎穎;;電影版權(quán)評(píng)估指標(biāo)體系新探[J];青年記者;2011年07期

10 張昌爾;積極探索中國(guó)特色文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展之路[J];求是;2003年21期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 記者 楊浩鵬;[N];中國(guó)文化報(bào);2012年

2 本報(bào)記者 龍昊　整理;[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)報(bào);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1663592