本文選題：專利侵權(quán)　切入點：“通知——移除”規(guī)則　出處：《寧波大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：現(xiàn)代社會生活離不開網(wǎng)絡(luò),網(wǎng)絡(luò)的高速發(fā)展給在人類帶來極大便捷的同時,也對傳統(tǒng)法律制度帶來了挑戰(zhàn),知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度就是受到?jīng)_擊最大的領(lǐng)域之一。如何在保護知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的同時不阻礙網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)和網(wǎng)絡(luò)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展,是擺在法律人面前的難題。為解決這一問題,美國國會在1998年通過《千禧年數(shù)字版權(quán)法》(DMCA),在網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)糾紛中確立了以“通知與移除”為核心內(nèi)容的“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則。我國借鑒該規(guī)則在《信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護條例》中做出了較為詳細的規(guī)定。并在其后出臺的《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》中將“通知——移除”規(guī)則作為網(wǎng)絡(luò)民事侵權(quán)的一般性規(guī)定確立了下來。專利權(quán)作為《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》保護的客體之一,其網(wǎng)絡(luò)糾紛應(yīng)當適用“通知——移除”規(guī)則。但專利權(quán)與著作權(quán)、商標權(quán)侵權(quán)判定具有較大差別,專利侵權(quán)判斷因為技術(shù)因素,專業(yè)性特別強,網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者僅靠普通人的知識、技術(shù)和一般經(jīng)驗無法做出判斷。如果專利權(quán)侵權(quán)完全照搬著作權(quán)相關(guān)規(guī)定,簡單地賦予網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者全面判定專利侵權(quán)義務(wù),不恰當?shù)丶又亓司W(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)者經(jīng)營責(zé)任。如何針對專利權(quán)本身特性,結(jié)合制度規(guī)定和我國的實踐,借鑒與吸收國外相關(guān)制度的有益經(jīng)驗,制定適合網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利權(quán)侵權(quán)特點和網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)、網(wǎng)絡(luò)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的專利侵權(quán)責(zé)任制度,是專利法修改中爭論的焦點問題,也是本文擬討論與解決的核心問題。本文在“通知——移除”規(guī)則既有定義之下探討了該規(guī)則在網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)案件中適用的可行性,認為這一規(guī)則雖然起源于版權(quán)領(lǐng)域,而且專利侵權(quán)確實與版權(quán)侵權(quán)具有一定的差異性,但是,在適當?shù)闹贫葥p益之后,在網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)中仍有適用的余地,并就此展開理論的研究與實踐的考察。本文共分四個部分,第一部分是對“通知——移除”規(guī)則本身概況的討論,主要敘述了“通知——移除”規(guī)則在美國的產(chǎn)生,以及我國對該規(guī)則在網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)領(lǐng)域中的移植。因我國在移植該規(guī)則時沒有充分考慮中美法律差異性,造成了“通知——移除”規(guī)則性質(zhì)在我國學(xué)界存在相互矛盾的兩種解釋。同時,該規(guī)則雖是現(xiàn)階段能夠找到的平衡各方利益最優(yōu)的解決方式,但在實施過程中濫用問題較為突出。這部分對“通知——移除”規(guī)則本身概況的討論,為下文討論其在網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)中適用的可行性問題做好鋪墊。第二部分對“通知——移除”規(guī)則適用到網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)中進行了可行性分析,在上文所討論“通知——移除”規(guī)則本身概況的基礎(chǔ)上,分三個方面討論該規(guī)則適用于網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)領(lǐng)域中的可行性。首先,網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)中適用“通知——移除”規(guī)則符合利益平衡原則。其次,網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)中適用“通知——移除”規(guī)則符合立法目的。最后,網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)中適用“通知——移除”規(guī)則符合過錯原則。通過可行性分析,為下文規(guī)則適用具體規(guī)定的討論打好基礎(chǔ)。第三部分從“通知——移除”規(guī)則在網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)中適用的判斷要素分別討論,即適用主體、客觀要件、主觀要件以及“通知”、“移除”具體規(guī)定四個方面做出討論。在分析專利侵權(quán)與版權(quán)侵權(quán)區(qū)別的基礎(chǔ)上,借鑒版權(quán)相關(guān)規(guī)定,針對差異性制定適用于網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)的“通知——移除”規(guī)則。第四部分對該規(guī)則適用提出了一些配套制度建議,認為可以借鑒網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺服務(wù)提供者的現(xiàn)有經(jīng)驗,完善“通知——移除”規(guī)則實施情況。
[Abstract]:Modern society cannot do without the network, the rapid development of network brings great convenience to the human at the same time, it also brings challenges to the traditional legal system, intellectual property system is one of the largest areas of impact. How does not hinder the network technology and the development of the network industry in the protection of intellectual property rights, is a difficult problem in legal person before. In order to solve this problem, the United States Congress passed the "Digital Millennium Copyright Law in 1998 (DMCA), the network copyright disputes established by the" notice and remove the "as the core content of the" safe harbor "rules. The rules of our reference made more detailed provisions in" information network the regulation on the protection of the right of communication. And in the subsequent introduction of the "tort liability law" in the "notice to remove" rule as the network tort general provisions established. As the patent tort law > < Paul One of the object system, the network disputes should apply the "notice to remove" rule. But the patent right and copyright, trademark infringement has a larger difference between the judgment of patent infringement because of technical factors, particularly strong professional network service providers, relying on ordinary people's knowledge, technology and experience in general if the patent is unable to make a judgment. Completely copy the relevant provisions of the copyright infringement, simply give the network service provider comprehensive patent infringement obligation inappropriately increased responsibility for network services management. According to the characteristics of patent right itself, combined with the regulations and the practice of our country, the beneficial experience and the absorption of foreign related system, for the development of the network characteristics of patent infringement and the network technology, patent infringement liability system in the development of the Internet industry, is the focus of the patent law revision of the debate, this paper also intends to discuss and solve The core of the problem. Based on the "notice to remove" rule is defined under the feasibility of the applicable rules of patent infringement cases in the network, although that this rule originated in the field of copyright and patent infringement and copyright infringement does have some differences, but after the system gains appropriate, in the network there is still room for patent infringement, and to carry out a study of theory research and practice. This paper is divided into four parts, the first part is the discussion of the "notice to remove" rule of itself, mainly describes the "notice - remove" rule in the United States, and our country to the rule in transplantation in the field of Internet infringement. Because our country is in transplantation the rules did not fully consider the difference of Sino US law caused, "notice to remove" rule properties in the presence of my circle of conflicting Ancient Chinese Literature Search The two explanation. At the same time, the rules are now able to find the optimal solution to balance the interests of all parties, but in the implementation process of abuse problems are more prominent. This part of the discussion of the "notice to remove" rule of itself, to pave the way for the following discussion the feasibility of its application in the patent infringement in the network at the second part of the "notice - remove" rules apply to patent infringement in the network carried out a feasibility analysis on the basis of above discussion "notice to remove" rule itself on the general situation, divided into three aspects to discuss the rules for the feasibility of network in the field of patent infringement. First of all, in accordance with the principle of balance of interests "notice - remove" applicable rules of patent infringement in the network. Secondly, according to the legislative objective "notice to remove" rule for patent infringement in the network. Finally, the network for patent infringement "Notice to remove" rule in accordance with the principle of fault. Through feasibility analysis, laid the foundation for the following discussion of the specific provisions of applicable rules. The third part discussed elements of judgment from the "notice - remove" applicable rules of patent infringement in the network, which is the main objective elements, the subjective elements and the "notice", "specific remove the" provisions of the four aspects discussed. Based on the analysis of patent infringement and copyright infringement on the difference of the reference, the relevant provisions of the copyright, the difference formulation is applied to the network of patent infringement "notice to remove" rule. The fourth part puts forward some suggestions on the applicable rules of the supporting system, that can draw lessons from the existing experience of network service platform the provider, perfecting the "notice to remove" rule implementation.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王遷;;論“通知與移除”規(guī)則對專利領(lǐng)域的適用性——兼評《專利法修訂草案(送審稿)》第63條第2款[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2016年03期

2 周奇;段志鯤;魏W，

本文編號：1628668