發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-18 07:59

  本文選題：專利侵權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：“通知——移除”規(guī)則　出處：《寧波大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：現(xiàn)代社會(huì)生活離不開網(wǎng)絡(luò),網(wǎng)絡(luò)的高速發(fā)展給在人類帶來(lái)極大便捷的同時(shí),也對(duì)傳統(tǒng)法律制度帶來(lái)了挑戰(zhàn),知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度就是受到?jīng)_擊最大的領(lǐng)域之一。如何在保護(hù)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的同時(shí)不阻礙網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)和網(wǎng)絡(luò)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展,是擺在法律人面前的難題。為解決這一問(wèn)題,美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)在1998年通過(guò)《千禧年數(shù)字版權(quán)法》(DMCA),在網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)糾紛中確立了以“通知與移除”為核心內(nèi)容的“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則。我國(guó)借鑒該規(guī)則在《信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護(hù)條例》中做出了較為詳細(xì)的規(guī)定。并在其后出臺(tái)的《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》中將“通知——移除”規(guī)則作為網(wǎng)絡(luò)民事侵權(quán)的一般性規(guī)定確立了下來(lái)。專利權(quán)作為《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》保護(hù)的客體之一,其網(wǎng)絡(luò)糾紛應(yīng)當(dāng)適用“通知——移除”規(guī)則。但專利權(quán)與著作權(quán)、商標(biāo)權(quán)侵權(quán)判定具有較大差別,專利侵權(quán)判斷因?yàn)榧夹g(shù)因素,專業(yè)性特別強(qiáng),網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者僅靠普通人的知識(shí)、技術(shù)和一般經(jīng)驗(yàn)無(wú)法做出判斷。如果專利權(quán)侵權(quán)完全照搬著作權(quán)相關(guān)規(guī)定,簡(jiǎn)單地賦予網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者全面判定專利侵權(quán)義務(wù),不恰當(dāng)?shù)丶又亓司W(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)者經(jīng)營(yíng)責(zé)任。如何針對(duì)專利權(quán)本身特性,結(jié)合制度規(guī)定和我國(guó)的實(shí)踐,借鑒與吸收國(guó)外相關(guān)制度的有益經(jīng)驗(yàn),制定適合網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利權(quán)侵權(quán)特點(diǎn)和網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)、網(wǎng)絡(luò)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的專利侵權(quán)責(zé)任制度,是專利法修改中爭(zhēng)論的焦點(diǎn)問(wèn)題,也是本文擬討論與解決的核心問(wèn)題。本文在“通知——移除”規(guī)則既有定義之下探討了該規(guī)則在網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)案件中適用的可行性,認(rèn)為這一規(guī)則雖然起源于版權(quán)領(lǐng)域,而且專利侵權(quán)確實(shí)與版權(quán)侵權(quán)具有一定的差異性,但是,在適當(dāng)?shù)闹贫葥p益之后,在網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)中仍有適用的余地,并就此展開理論的研究與實(shí)踐的考察。本文共分四個(gè)部分,第一部分是對(duì)“通知——移除”規(guī)則本身概況的討論,主要敘述了“通知——移除”規(guī)則在美國(guó)的產(chǎn)生,以及我國(guó)對(duì)該規(guī)則在網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)領(lǐng)域中的移植。因我國(guó)在移植該規(guī)則時(shí)沒(méi)有充分考慮中美法律差異性,造成了“通知——移除”規(guī)則性質(zhì)在我國(guó)學(xué)界存在相互矛盾的兩種解釋。同時(shí),該規(guī)則雖是現(xiàn)階段能夠找到的平衡各方利益最優(yōu)的解決方式,但在實(shí)施過(guò)程中濫用問(wèn)題較為突出。這部分對(duì)“通知——移除”規(guī)則本身概況的討論,為下文討論其在網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)中適用的可行性問(wèn)題做好鋪墊。第二部分對(duì)“通知——移除”規(guī)則適用到網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)中進(jìn)行了可行性分析,在上文所討論“通知——移除”規(guī)則本身概況的基礎(chǔ)上,分三個(gè)方面討論該規(guī)則適用于網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)領(lǐng)域中的可行性。首先,網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)中適用“通知——移除”規(guī)則符合利益平衡原則。其次,網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)中適用“通知——移除”規(guī)則符合立法目的。最后,網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)中適用“通知——移除”規(guī)則符合過(guò)錯(cuò)原則。通過(guò)可行性分析,為下文規(guī)則適用具體規(guī)定的討論打好基礎(chǔ)。第三部分從“通知——移除”規(guī)則在網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)中適用的判斷要素分別討論,即適用主體、客觀要件、主觀要件以及“通知”、“移除”具體規(guī)定四個(gè)方面做出討論。在分析專利侵權(quán)與版權(quán)侵權(quán)區(qū)別的基礎(chǔ)上,借鑒版權(quán)相關(guān)規(guī)定,針對(duì)差異性制定適用于網(wǎng)絡(luò)專利侵權(quán)的“通知——移除”規(guī)則。第四部分對(duì)該規(guī)則適用提出了一些配套制度建議,認(rèn)為可以借鑒網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)服務(wù)提供者的現(xiàn)有經(jīng)驗(yàn),完善“通知——移除”規(guī)則實(shí)施情況。
[Abstract]:Modern society cannot do without the network, the rapid development of network brings great convenience to the human at the same time, it also brings challenges to the traditional legal system, intellectual property system is one of the largest areas of impact. How does not hinder the network technology and the development of the network industry in the protection of intellectual property rights, is a difficult problem in legal person before. In order to solve this problem, the United States Congress passed the "Digital Millennium Copyright Law in 1998 (DMCA), the network copyright disputes established by the" notice and remove the "as the core content of the" safe harbor "rules. The rules of our reference made more detailed provisions in" information network the regulation on the protection of the right of communication. And in the subsequent introduction of the "tort liability law" in the "notice to remove" rule as the network tort general provisions established. As the patent tort law > < Paul One of the object system, the network disputes should apply the "notice to remove" rule. But the patent right and copyright, trademark infringement has a larger difference between the judgment of patent infringement because of technical factors, particularly strong professional network service providers, relying on ordinary people's knowledge, technology and experience in general if the patent is unable to make a judgment. Completely copy the relevant provisions of the copyright infringement, simply give the network service provider comprehensive patent infringement obligation inappropriately increased responsibility for network services management. According to the characteristics of patent right itself, combined with the regulations and the practice of our country, the beneficial experience and the absorption of foreign related system, for the development of the network characteristics of patent infringement and the network technology, patent infringement liability system in the development of the Internet industry, is the focus of the patent law revision of the debate, this paper also intends to discuss and solve The core of the problem. Based on the "notice to remove" rule is defined under the feasibility of the applicable rules of patent infringement cases in the network, although that this rule originated in the field of copyright and patent infringement and copyright infringement does have some differences, but after the system gains appropriate, in the network there is still room for patent infringement, and to carry out a study of theory research and practice. This paper is divided into four parts, the first part is the discussion of the "notice to remove" rule of itself, mainly describes the "notice - remove" rule in the United States, and our country to the rule in transplantation in the field of Internet infringement. Because our country is in transplantation the rules did not fully consider the difference of Sino US law caused, "notice to remove" rule properties in the presence of my circle of conflicting Ancient Chinese Literature Search The two explanation. At the same time, the rules are now able to find the optimal solution to balance the interests of all parties, but in the implementation process of abuse problems are more prominent. This part of the discussion of the "notice to remove" rule of itself, to pave the way for the following discussion the feasibility of its application in the patent infringement in the network at the second part of the "notice - remove" rules apply to patent infringement in the network carried out a feasibility analysis on the basis of above discussion "notice to remove" rule itself on the general situation, divided into three aspects to discuss the rules for the feasibility of network in the field of patent infringement. First of all, in accordance with the principle of balance of interests "notice - remove" applicable rules of patent infringement in the network. Secondly, according to the legislative objective "notice to remove" rule for patent infringement in the network. Finally, the network for patent infringement "Notice to remove" rule in accordance with the principle of fault. Through feasibility analysis, laid the foundation for the following discussion of the specific provisions of applicable rules. The third part discussed elements of judgment from the "notice - remove" applicable rules of patent infringement in the network, which is the main objective elements, the subjective elements and the "notice", "specific remove the" provisions of the four aspects discussed. Based on the analysis of patent infringement and copyright infringement on the difference of the reference, the relevant provisions of the copyright, the difference formulation is applied to the network of patent infringement "notice to remove" rule. The fourth part puts forward some suggestions on the applicable rules of the supporting system, that can draw lessons from the existing experience of network service platform the provider, perfecting the "notice to remove" rule implementation.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：寧波大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王遷;;論“通知與移除”規(guī)則對(duì)專利領(lǐng)域的適用性——兼評(píng)《專利法修訂草案(送審稿)》第63條第2款[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2016年03期

2 周奇;段志鯤;魏W，

本文編號(hào)：1628668