本文選題：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：期待利益　出處：《延邊大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近年來,在市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)和科學(xué)、文化事業(yè)不斷發(fā)展的背景下。人們不僅在物質(zhì)生活方面得到了巨大的提升,同時(shí)在精神世界方面也得到了極大豐富。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)作為一種精神產(chǎn)物,其所帶來的經(jīng)濟(jì)利益在人們的財(cái)產(chǎn)中所占的比重越來越大。相比于一般的財(cái)產(chǎn)利益,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)具有更強(qiáng)的不確定性,因?yàn)橹R(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)本身是一種智力成果,在它轉(zhuǎn)化為物質(zhì)財(cái)產(chǎn)之前,其經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值處于"可期待狀態(tài)",本文將這種"可期待狀態(tài)"稱之為"知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的期待利益"。由于我國相關(guān)法律的不完善導(dǎo)致離婚后知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的期待利益分割在司法實(shí)踐上產(chǎn)生了較多問題。首先,由于我國立法上沒有將知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的期待利益確認(rèn)為夫妻的共同財(cái)產(chǎn)。這在理論界引起了很大的爭論,許多學(xué)者認(rèn)為知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的期待利益應(yīng)該與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)在婚內(nèi)獲得的收益一樣,歸屬為夫妻雙方的共同財(cái)產(chǎn)。其次,在司法實(shí)踐上對(duì)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的期待利益大多是以"適當(dāng)照顧"的方式處理,但法律上關(guān)于"適當(dāng)照顧"的規(guī)定很模糊,導(dǎo)致司法上出現(xiàn)了不同的適用方式。再次,由于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)自身的復(fù)雜性,對(duì)于夫妻一方享有知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)時(shí)期待利益的分割情況,應(yīng)具體問題具體分析,不能一概而論。最后,法律對(duì)于離婚后知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)期待利益的分割方式?jīng)]有具體規(guī)定。針對(duì)上述問題,本文提出如下完善建議。首先,在立法上應(yīng)當(dāng)確認(rèn)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)期待利益為夫妻共同財(cái)產(chǎn)。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的專屬性應(yīng)在于它的人身權(quán),而財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)屬于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)中可以分割的部分。因此,法律上既然確定了婚姻關(guān)系中知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)既得利益的可分性,那么也應(yīng)當(dāng)將知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的期待利益確定為離婚后可分割的夫妻共同財(cái)產(chǎn)范圍。其次,明確"適當(dāng)照顧"原則與分割的區(qū)別。應(yīng)在確定知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)期待利益為夫妻共同財(cái)產(chǎn)的前提下,將"適當(dāng)照顧"作為特殊情況下的一種處理方式。再次,界定夫妻一方享有知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)時(shí)期待利益的分割類型。在知識(shí)產(chǎn)生于婚前的情況下,如果收益于婚內(nèi)則知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)期待利益應(yīng)當(dāng)作為夫妻共同財(cái)產(chǎn)予以分割;如果在婚內(nèi)未產(chǎn)生收益則要視非知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)一方是否對(duì)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)期待利益的產(chǎn)生作出直接或間接貢獻(xiàn)而區(qū)別對(duì)待。在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)產(chǎn)生于婚內(nèi)的情況下,無論收益產(chǎn)生于婚內(nèi)還是婚后,對(duì)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)期待利益都應(yīng)予以分割。最后,提出對(duì)于離婚后知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)期待利益的具體分割方式。為了兼顧知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)期待利益分割的公平性和效率性,建議采用賦予非知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)所有方期待利益分割請(qǐng)求權(quán)為主,一次性分割和適當(dāng)照顧為輔的分割原則。
[Abstract]:In recent years, under the background of market economy, science and cultural development, people have not only been greatly promoted in material life, but also greatly enriched in spiritual world. Intellectual property as a spiritual product, The economic benefits it brings are taking up an increasing proportion of people's property. Intellectual property is more uncertain than property interests in general, because intellectual property itself is an intellectual product. Before it was converted into material property, Its economic value is in the "expectable state", which is called "the expected interest of intellectual property" in this paper. Due to the imperfection of relevant laws in our country, the expected interest of intellectual property right after divorce is divided in the department. There are many problems in the practice of law. First of all, Due to the fact that the expectant interest of intellectual property is not recognized as the common property of husband and wife in our country's legislation, this has aroused great controversy in the theoretical circle. Many scholars believe that the expected interest of intellectual property should be the same as the income earned by intellectual property in marriage. Second, in judicial practice, the expected interests of intellectual property are mostly dealt with in a "proper care" manner, but the legal provisions on "proper care" are vague. Third, due to the complexity of intellectual property rights, the division of the expected interests of one spouse who enjoys intellectual property rights should be analyzed concretely, not generalized.Finally, The law does not specify the way in which intellectual property rights expect benefits to be divided after divorce. In view of the above problems, this paper puts forward the following suggestions for perfection. First of all, In legislation, intellectual property rights should be recognized as the joint property of husband and wife. The exclusive nature of intellectual property rights should be its personal rights, and property rights belong to the divisible parts of intellectual property rights. Since the division of vested interests in intellectual property rights in a marriage relationship is legally established, the expected interest in intellectual property rights should also be defined as the divisible joint property of the husband and wife after divorce. Secondly, Clear distinction between the principle of "due care" and division... "due consideration" should be considered as a special treatment in exceptional circumstances... once again, subject to the determination that the intellectual property rights are expected to be the common property of the couple. In the case that the knowledge comes into being before marriage, if the income is in marriage, the expected interest of intellectual property should be divided as the joint property of husband and wife. If no proceeds are generated in the marriage, it is to be treated differently depending on whether the non-intellectual property party contributes, directly or indirectly, to the expected benefit of the intellectual property right... in the case of intellectual property arising within the marriage, Whether the proceeds arise in marriage or after marriage, the expected benefits of intellectual property should be divided. Finally, In order to give consideration to the fairness and efficiency of the division of the expected interests of intellectual property rights, it is proposed to give the non-intellectual property parties the right to request the division of the expected interests. The principle of one-off segmentation and proper care.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.9

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高賀新;;美國法律對(duì)期待利益救濟(jì)的限制[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年07期

2 ;約定免責(zé)不能請(qǐng)求期待利益[J];農(nóng)家致富;2013年03期

3 王學(xué)斌;閆弘宇;;期待利益的比較法研究[J];理論月刊;2011年02期

4 張芳霞;淺析合同期待利益的確定與計(jì)算[J];北京廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

5 肖海鵬;;美國合同法違約救濟(jì)之期待利益及其限制(英文)[J];中國外資;2014年02期

6 張文芳;;違約損害賠償計(jì)算問題研究——以期待利益為視角[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年11期

7 劉滔滔;;違約之訴中可期待利益的法律保護(hù)[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2012年10期

8 李美燕;;再談胎兒利益之保護(hù)——以死體胎兒的期待利益為視角[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年S2期

9 曹賢信;姚建軍;;離婚后知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)期待利益歸屬的立法選擇[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年11期

10 褚清清;;“公共利益”問題話要[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 丁成玉;期待利益的確定[N];人民法院報(bào);2004年

2 隆文雄;合同期待利益賠償?shù)倪m用[N];人民法院報(bào);2002年

3 徐乾　石榮;公開拍賣事后反悔　　法院判賠期待利益[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2003年

4 徐乾 石榮;合同的期待利益受法律保護(hù)[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2003年

5 徐乾 石榮;公開拍賣竟然反悔 法院判賠期待利益[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2003年

6 呂太如;析侵害生命權(quán)案中受害人父母的贍養(yǎng)期待利益損失[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2006年

7 河南省安陽市龍安區(qū)人民法院 楊如意;可期待利益無法保護(hù)[N];人民法院報(bào);2006年

8 重慶市第五中級(jí)人民法院 趙克;因離婚產(chǎn)生的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)期待利益的分割[N];人民法院報(bào);2013年

9 李燕京;“正規(guī)軍”期待利益之矛[N];中國有色金屬報(bào);2013年

10 本報(bào)記者 趙興武 本報(bào)通訊員 李鈺;患者健康“期待利益”怎么保護(hù)[N];人民法院報(bào);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條

1 張政一;合同中的期待利益研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2016年

2 張鎮(zhèn)鏞;論離婚后知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)期待利益的分割[D];延邊大學(xué);2017年

3 張國林;合同法上的期待利益研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

4 夏鵬;論違約損害賠償中期待利益的認(rèn)定[D];鄭州大學(xué);2011年

5 史旭麗;期待利益的賠償問題研究[D];山西大學(xué);2011年

6 胡慶;可期待利益的裁量與羈束[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

7 張濤;論合同中的期待利益[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué);2013年

8 張小艷;合同損害賠償中的期待利益研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2012年

9 王冠男;違約損害賠償中的期待利益[D];中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1628491